| Literature DB >> 36247674 |
Abstract
In this work, we have investigated several pure organic room temperature phosphorescent materials with donor-methylene acceptor configurations with relatively different quantum efficiency. The results show that the introduction of methylene functional group in room temperature phosphorescent materials based on donor-acceptor configuration is more favorable for obtaining higher phosphorescent quantum efficiency in crystal phase environment. More importantly, our calculations reveal the root cause of the excellent quantum efficiency performance after the introduction of methylene groups. The results show that the introduction of methylene can inhibit the structural deformation of molecules during the excited state transition process and give them higher interaction. Moreover, in the donor-acceptor configuration, the heavy atom effect is more favorable to the formation of π-x (X = Br) interaction to accelerate the occurrence of intersystem crossing and achieve a higher intersystem crossing rate. Therefore, the donor-methylene-acceptor molecule is expected to improve the quantum efficiency of room temperature phosphorescence, and the addition of heavy atoms is more conducive to prolong the life of room temperature phosphorescence. This work provides a useful reference for rational design of room temperature phosphorescent materials with high efficiency and long life.Entities:
Keywords: DFT; luminescence mechanism; methylene; nonradiative rates; room temperature phosphorescent
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247674 PMCID: PMC9558821 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1010676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
SCHEME 1The structure of studied molecules.
FIGURE 1The dihedral Angle of studied molecules.
FIGURE 2Comparison of S state and T state geometry, RMSD values of the studied molecules.
FIGURE 3The HOMO and LUMO orbital diagram and energy gap of studied molecules.
FIGURE 4Schematic diagram of spin-orbit coupling constants.
FIGURE 5The comparison of adiabatic energy levels for different transition states.
The excited state energy (eV) and energy gap (eV) of the studied molecule.
| BB | B | CzBBr | CzPBr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 3.12 | 3.18 | 4.29 | 4.34 |
| T1 | 3.05 | 2.81 | 3.38 | 3.75 |
| △E (S1
| 0.07 | 0.37 | 0.91 | 0.59 |
FIGURE 6The distribution diagram of electron and hole.
The optical physical property parameters of studied molecules.
| S1→T1 | T1→S0 | ΦP (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kisc (s−1) | Kr (s−1) | knr (s−1) | calcd | exptl | |
| BB | 1.87×108 | 52.6 | 1.20×103 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
| B | 1.32×105 | 1.66 | 9.07×103 | ||
| CzBBr | 3.29×108 | 0.16 | 1.12×102 | ||
| CzPBr | 8.87×104 | 0.26 | 0.51 | ||