| Literature DB >> 36247620 |
Rui Wang1,2,3, Xiaoling Miao1,2,3.
Abstract
Nitrogen deprivation induces variations in fatty acid desaturation in microalgae, which determines the performance of biodiesel and the nutritional value of bioproducts. However, the detailed scenario and the underlying regulatory mechanism remain unclear. In this study, we attempt to outline these scenario and mechanisms by performing biochemical, lipidomic, and transcriptomic analyses in Chlorella pyrenoidosa and functional characterization of transcription factors in Yarrowia lipolytica. We found that early nitrogen deprivation dramatically reduced fatty acid desaturation without increasing lipid content. The contents of palmitic acid (16:0) and oleic acid (18:1) dramatically increased to 2.14 and 2.87 times that of nitrogen repletion on the second day, respectively. Lipidomic analysis showed the transfer of polyunsaturated fatty acids from phospholipids and glycolipids to triacylglycerols, and an increase in lipid species with 16:0 or 18:1 under nitrogen deprivation conditions. Upregulated stearoyl-ACP desaturase and oleyl-ACP thioesterase promoted the synthesis of 18:1, but restricted acetyl-CoA supply revealed that it was the intensive lipid turnover instead of an attenuated Kennedy pathway that played an important role in the variation in fatty acid composition under early nitrogen deprivation. Finally, two differentially expressed SQUAMOSA promoter-binding proteins (SBPs) were heterologously expressed in Y. lipolytica, demonstrating their role in promoting the accumulation of total fatty acid and the reduction in fatty acid desaturation. These results revealed the crucial role of lipid turnover and SBPs in determining fatty acid desaturation under early nitrogen deprivation, opening new avenues for the metabolic engineering of fatty acid desaturation in microalgae.Entities:
Keywords: SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein; fatty acid desaturation; lipid turnover; microalgae; nitrogen deprivation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247620 PMCID: PMC9558234 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.987354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Effects of nitrogen deprivation on growth and biochemical composition of Chlorella pyrenoidosa. (A) Biomass yield. (B) Protein content. (C) Carbohydrate content. (D) Lipid content. DCW, dry cell weight. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Student’s t-test was performed to determine statistically significant differences: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Dynamic variation of fatty acid profile in Chlorella pyrenoidosa under nitrogen repletion and deprivation conditions.
| Fatty acid (%) | Day 2 | Day 6 | Day 12 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | ND | CON | ND | CON | ND | ||
| C14:0 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.46 ± 0.07 | |
| C15:0 | nd | 0.19 ± 0.14 | nd | 0.17 ± 0.04** | nd | 0.17 ± 0.02*** | |
| C16:0 | 22.67 ± 0.29 | 48.45 ± 0.67*** | 29.70 ± 1.63 | 40.65 ± 1.56** | 30.86 ± 1.35 | 35.89 ± 1.20* | |
| C16:1 | 7.16 ± 0.08 | 1.25 ± 0.15*** | nd | 0.24 ± 0.17 | 0.62 ± 0.88 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | |
| C16:2 | 7.48 ± 0.13 | 1.53 ± 0.13*** | 3.01 ± 0.70 | 0.79 ± 0.08* | 1.56 ± 0.15 | 0.76 ± 0.07** | |
| C16:3 | 18.59 ± 0.20 | 10.48 ± 0.74*** | 14.80 ± 0.93 | 6.78 ± 0.36*** | 14.07 ± 0.68 | 6.73 ± 0.53*** | |
| C17:0 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.08** | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.04* | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.61 ± 0.02** | |
| C18:0 | 4.60 ± 0.26 | 6.84 ± 0.38** | 8.05 ± 0.49 | 13.62 ± 0.73*** | 7.61 ± 1.18 | 9.64 ± 2.55 | |
| C18:1 | 1.70 ± 0.01 | 4.88 ± 0.33*** | 2.70 ± 0.51 | 9.97 ± 0.43*** | 3.70 ± 0.18 | 11.90 ± 1.55** | |
| C18:2 | 16.90 ± 0.16 | 12.73 ± 0.19*** | 16.73 ± 0.24 | 13.10 ± 0.52*** | 13.90 ± 0.50 | 16.80 ± 1.05* | |
| C18:3 | 19.46 ± 0.31 | 12.14 ± 0.32*** | 23.17 ± 0.36 | 12.82 ± 0.75*** | 25.89 ± 0.09 | 16.05 ± 0.75*** | |
| C20-C26 | 0.66 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.10* | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.74 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.62 ± 0.20 | |
| SFA | 28.04 ± 0.51 | 56.64 ± 0.97*** | 38.69 ± 1.76 | 55.56 ± 2.17** | 39.35 ± 2.19 | 46.77 ± 3.73 | |
| UFA | 71.30 ± 0.48 | 43.00 ± 1.06*** | 60.41 ± 1.72 | 43.70 ± 2.21** | 59.75 ± 2.24 | 52.62 ± 3.85 | |
| PUFA | 62.43 ± 0.54 | 36.88 ± 1.19*** | 57.71 ± 2.19 | 33.48 ± 1.69*** | 55.43 ± 1.32 | 40.34 ± 2.30** | |
| MUFA | 8.87 ± 0.08 | 6.12 ± 0.18*** | 2.70 ± 0.51 | 10.22 ± 0.59*** | 4.32 ± 1.05 | 12.27 ± 1.58** | |
Cells under nitrogen repletion (control, CON) and nitrogen deprivation (ND) conditions were harvested on days 2, 6, and 12. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Student’s t-test was performed to determine statistically significant differences: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2Dynamic changes of the individual lipid classes in Chlorella pyrenoidosa under nitrogen repletion and deprivation conditions. (A) PCA score plot of six lipidomic datasets. Cells under control (C) and nitrogen deprivation (N) were harvested on days 2, 6, and 12. (B) The box–whisker plots of main neutral lipids. DG, diacylglycerol; TG, triacylglycerol. (C) The box–whisker plots of main phospholipids. PC, phosphatidylcholine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; LPG, lysophosphatidylglycerol. (D) The box–whisker plots of main glycolipids. MGDG, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol; DGDG, digalactosyldiacylglycerol; SQDG, sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol; MGMG, monogalactosylmonoacylglycerol; DGMG, digalactosylmonoacylglycerol; SQMG, sulfoquinovosylmonoacylglycerols. Lipid classes whose total concentration exceeded 1.0e+08 were presented; all lipid classes are shown in . Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Student’s t-test was performed to determine statistically significant differences: NS, no significance, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Dynamic changes in individual lipid species in Chlorella pyrenoidosa under nitrogen repletion and deprivation conditions. (A, B) Response area of neutral lipids. MG, monoacylglycerol; DG, diacylglycerol; TG, triacylglycerol. (C–E) Response area of glycolipids. MGDG, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol; DGDG, digalactosyldiacylglycerol; SQDG, sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol; MGMG, monogalactosylmonoacylglycerol; DGMG, digalactosylmonoacylglycerol; SQMG, sulfoquinovosylmonoacylglycerols. (F, G) Response area of phospholipids. PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PI, phosphatidylinositol; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; LPE, lysophosphatidylethanolamine; LPG, lysophosphatidylglycerol; LPI, lysophosphatidylinositol. Triacylglycerol species whose response area was more than 5.0e+08, and other lipid species with more than 1.0e+07 were presented; all lipid species are shown in . Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Student’s t-test was performed to determine statistically significant differences: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4Differentially expressed genes of selected pathways respond to nitrogen deprivation in Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Each square box indicates a gene isoform annotated in the transcriptome. Different colors of boxes represent the differential expression of genes, and the explanation is shown at the bottom right of the figure. All presented fold changes are statistically significant, p < 0.05. Reactions whose enzymes are not shown are denoted as dashed arrows. RuBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate; 3-PGA, 3-phosphoglyceric acid; 1,3-BPG, 1,3-biphosphoglycerate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; OAA, oxaloacetic acid; ACT, aconitate; ICIT, isocitrate; 2-OG, α-ketoglutarate; Suc-CoA, succinyl-CoA; Suc, succinic acid; FUM, fumarate; MAL, malic acid; ACP, acyl carrier protein; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; PA, phosphatidic acid; DAG, diacylglycerol; TAG, triacylglycerol; CDP, cytidine diphosphate; PGP, phosphatidylglycerolphosphate; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PS, phosphatidylserine; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; LPE, lysophosphatidylethanolamine; LPG, lysophosphatidylglycerol; LPI, lysophosphatidylinositol; LPS, lysophosphatidylserine; MGDG, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol; DGDG, digalactosyldiacylglycerol; SQDG, sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol; Rubisco, ribulose diphosphate carboxylase; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PGI, phosphoglucose isomerase; SS, starch synthase; BE, 1,4-a-glucan branching enzyme; α-AMY, α-amylase; β-AMY, β-amylase; SP, starch phosphorylase; ISA, isoamylase; PK, pyruvate kinase; aceE, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component; aceF, pyruvate dehydrogenase E2 component; pdhD, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; ACSL, long chain acyl-CoA synthase; ACOX1, acyl-CoA oxidase; ECH, enoly-CoA hydratase; HADH, 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase; ACAT, acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase CS, citrate synthase; ACL, ATP-citrate synthase; ACO, aconitate hydratase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; DLST, dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase; DLD, dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase; OGD, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase; LSC, succinyl-CoA synthetase; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; FUM, fumarate hydratase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase; ME, malic enzyme; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; MAT, malonyl-CoA ACP transacylase; KAS, beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase; KAR, beta-ketoacyl-ACP reductase; HAD, beta-hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydrase; EAR, enoyl-ACP reductase; AAD, acyl-ACP desaturase; OAH, oleoyl-ACP hydrolase; Δ12D, Δ12-desaturase; Δ15D, Δ15-desaturase; GK, glycerol kinase; GPDH, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GPAT, glycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase; LPAAT, lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase; PP, phosphatidate phosphatase; DGAT, diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase; TAGL, triacylglycerol lipase; CDS, CDP-diglyceride synthase; PGPS, phosphatidylglycerolphosphate synthase; PGPP, phosphatidylglycerolphosphate phosphatase; PIS, phosphatidylinositol synthase; PSS, phosphatidylserine synthase; PSD, phosphatidylserine decarboxylase; EPT, diacylglycerol ethanolaminephosphotransferase; CEPT, diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase; LPGAT, lyosphosphatidylglycerol acetyltransferase; LPCAT, lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase; LPEAT, lyosphosphatidylethanolamine acyltransferase; LPSAT, lyosphosphatidylserine acyltransferase; LPIAT, lyosphosphatidylinositol acyltransferase; MGD, 1,2-diacylglycerol 3-beta-galactosyltransferase; DGD, digalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase; SQD2, sulfoquinovosyltransferase.
Figure 5Construction, verification, and growth of Yarrowia lipolytica transformants with overexpressed SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein. (A) Diagram of the expression cassette. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products with different templates. (C) Relative expression level of SBP1. (D) Relative expression level of SBP2. (E) Growth of EV and transformants with overexpressed SBP1. (F) Growth of EV and transformants with overexpressed SBP2. EV, empty vector; SBP1-1/2, transformants with overexpressed SBP1; SBP2-1/2, transformants with overexpressed SBP2. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Student’s t-test was performed to determine statistically significant differences: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Fatty acid composition of Yarrowia lipolytica with overexpressed SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein.
| Fatty acid (%) | EV | SBP1-1 | SBP1-2 | SBP2-1 | SBP2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0 | 15.56 ± 0.16 | 14.58 ± 0.10** | 15.63 ± 0.20 | 16.21 ± 0.03* | 16.63 ± 0.68 |
| C16:1 | 13.59 ± 0.52 | 10.98 ± 0.32** | 13.74 ± 0.31 | 11.12 ± 0.07* | 11.98 ± 0.08* |
| C17:1 | 2.37 ± 0.09 | 3.08 ± 0.19** | 2.39 ± 0.04 | 3.30 ± 0.10** | 2.55 ± 0.20 |
| C18:0 | 1.89 ± 0.05 | 2.56 ± 0.17** | 2.03 ± 0.09 | 4.43 ± 0.08*** | 3.87 ± 0.21*** |
| C18:1 | 32.76 ± 0.29 | 38.93 ± 0.25*** | 37.88 ± 0.53*** | 36.30 ± 0.09** | 33.44 ± 0.86 |
| C18:2 | 30.80 ± 0.36 | 26.93 ± 0.06*** | 26.03 ± 0.42*** | 25.51 ± 0.05*** | 27.97 ± 0.74** |
| Others | 3.03 ± 0.15 | 2.94 ± 0.17 | 2.30 ± 0.07** | 3.11 ± 0.08 | 3.56 ± 0.06* |
| SFA | 18.67 ± 0.16 | 18.17 ± 0.19* | 18.64 ± 0.18 | 21.92 ± 0.03*** | 21.85 ± 0.84** |
| MUFA | 49.57 ± 0.46 | 53.87 ± 0.19*** | 54.71 ± 0.31*** | 51.56 ± 0.07* | 48.94 ± 1.19 |
| PUFA | 31.67 ± 0.36 | 27.66 ± 0.03*** | 26.48 ± 0.45*** | 26.17 ± 0.05*** | 28.97 ± 0.74** |
EV, empty vector; SBP1-1 and SBP1-2, transformants with overexpressed SBP1; SBP2-1 and SBP2-2, transformants with overexpressed SBP2.
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Student’s t-test was performed to determine statistically significant differences: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Fatty acid content of Yarrowia lipolytica with overexpressed SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein.
| Fatty acid (mg g−1) | EV | SBP1-1 | SBP1-2 | SBP2-1 | SBP2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0 | 2.41 ± 0.03 | 2.41 ± 0.09 | 3.09 ± 0.13** | 3.05 ± 0.03*** | 2.91 ± 0.15** |
| C16:1 | 2.10 ± 0.07 | 1.82 ± 0.10* | 2.72 ± 0.06*** | 2.09 ± 0.00 | 2.09 ± 0.01 |
| C17:1 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.02*** | 0.47 ± 0.02** | 0.62 ± 0.01*** | 0.45 ± 0.03* |
| C18:0 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.40 ± 0.02** | 0.83 ± 0.02*** | 0.68 ± 0.04*** |
| C18:1 | 5.07 ± 0.06 | 6.44 ± 0.21** | 7.49 ± 0.33*** | 6.83 ± 0.06*** | 5.85 ± 0.10*** |
| C18:2 | 4.77 ± 0.08 | 4.46 ± 0.15*** | 5.14 ± 0.08** | 4.80 ± 0.04 | 4.89 ± 0.16 |
| Others | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.58 ± 0.01* | 0.62 ± 0.01*** |
| SFA | 2.89 ± 0.04 | 3.01 ± 0.12 | 3.69 ± 0.14** | 4.12 ± 0.03*** | 3.82 ± 0.18** |
| MUFA | 7.67 ± 0.04 | 8.92 ± 0.30** | 10.82 ± 0.39*** | 9.69 ± 0.05*** | 8.56 ± 0.13*** |
| PUFA | 4.90 ± 0.08 | 4.58 ± 0.16 | 5.23 ± 0.07* | 4.92 ± 0.04 | 5.07 ± 0.16 |
| TFA | 15.48 ± 0.06 | 16.55 ± 0.58 | 19.77 ± 0.60*** | 18.80 ± 0.13*** | 17.49 ± 0.17*** |
EV, empty vector; SBP1-1 and SBP1-2, transformants with overexpressed SBP1; SBP2-1 and SBP2-2, transformants with overexpressed SBP2.
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Student’s t-test was performed to determine statistically significant differences: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.