| Literature DB >> 36247581 |
Yumeng Zhang1,2,3, Yaqi Wang1,2,3, Wei Wei1,2,3, Min Wang4, Shuzhao Jia4, Mingkun Yang1,2,3, Feng Ge1,2,3.
Abstract
Protein homeostasis is tightly regulated by protein quality control systems such as chaperones and proteases. In cyanobacteria, the ClpXP proteolytic complex is regarded as a representative proteolytic system and consists of a hexameric ATPase ClpX and a tetradecameric peptidase ClpP. However, the functions and molecular mechanisms of ClpX in cyanobacteria remain unclear. This study aimed to decipher the unique contributions and regulatory networks of ClpX in the model cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (hereafter Synechocystis). We showed that the interruption of clpX led to slower growth, decreased high light tolerance, and impaired photosynthetic cyclic electron transfer. A quantitative proteomic strategy was employed to globally identify ClpX-regulated proteins in Synechocystis cells. In total, we identified 172 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) upon the interruption of clpX. Functional analysis revealed that these DEPs are involved in diverse biological processes, including glycolysis, nitrogen assimilation, photosynthetic electron transport, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, and two-component signal transduction. The expression of 24 DEPs was confirmed by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) analysis. In particular, many hypothetical or unknown proteins were found to be regulated by ClpX, providing new candidates for future functional studies on ClpX. Together, our study provides a comprehensive ClpX-regulated protein network, and the results serve as an important resource for understanding protein quality control systems in cyanobacteria.Entities:
Keywords: ClpX; cyanobacteria; proteases; proteostasis; quantitative proteomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247581 PMCID: PMC9560874 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.994056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Conservativeness analysis of Clp family. (A) Comparing the number of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 Clp protease family homologs in different species. The blue and yellow columns indicate the count of Clp protease and Clp chaperon, respectively. (B) Schematic diagram of protein domains of Clp protease family from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. (C) The circos diagram indicates the whole Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 genome. The outermost layer and inner layer denote the genes on the plus strand and minus strand in the genome, respectively. The third, fourth, and innermost layers denote the genomic position of the 8 Clp protease family members, % GC content, and GC skew, respectively. (D) Phylogenetic tree and motifs of ClpX protein. The tree was generated using a neighbor-joining algorithm. The conserved motif was analyzed using the MEME tool and nine different motifs were identified. Different motifs are denoted by different borders and colors, and the same color in different ClpX proteins refers to the same motif. Their combined p values are on the right side of the figure.
Figure 2Functional effects of clpX in Synechocystis. (A) Growth curves of the wild type (WT) and ΔclpX strains under normal light (NL). (B) Measurement of maximum photochemistry efficiency (Fv/Fm) of the WT and ΔclpX strains under NL. (C) Measurement of oxygen evolution rates of the WT and ΔclpX strains under NL. (D) Analysis of the transient increase in chlorophyll fluorescence after the termination of AL illumination of the WT and ΔclpX strains under NL. (E) P700+ reduction kinetics of the WT and ΔclpX strains in the presence of DCMU under NL. (F) Growth curves of the WT and ΔclpX strain under high light (HL). (G) Measurement of maximum photochemistry efficiency (Fv/Fm) of the WT and ΔclpX strains under HL. (H) Measurement of oxygen evolution rates of the WT and ΔclpX strains under HL. (I) Analysis of the transient increase in chlorophyll fluorescence after the termination of AL illumination of the WT and ΔclpX strains under HL. (J) P700+ reduction kinetics of the WT and ΔclpX strains in the presence of DCMU under HL. ML, measuring light; AL, actinic light. Data are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by two-sample Student’s t-test (**, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).
Figure 3Workflow and quantitative proteomics data. (A) Workflow for TMT labeling quantitative proteomic strategy. (B) Pairwise correlation of peak area of identified proteins between three biological replicates. (C) Venn diagram showing the overlap of the number of detected proteins quantified proteins, and differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). (D) Volcano plots showing p-values (–log10) versus the fold change (log2) of DEPs. Proteins with p < 0.05 and fold change > 1.2 or < 0.83 are considered to be differentially expressed. Upregulated and downregulated proteins are marked as red and green dots, respectively.
Figure 4Functional analysis of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). (A) GO classification of the upregulated proteins and (B) downregulated proteins. (C) GO enrichment of the DEPs. Circle size indicates the number of enriched proteins. Color saturation represents the significance level.
Figure 5Validation of DEPs using Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) analysis. (A) Pairwise correlation of peak area of transitions for the selected DEPs between three biological replicates. (B) Heatmap showing the expression levels of the DEPs selected for validation by PRM. (C) Chromatograms represent the fragment ion extracted-ion chromatograms (XICs) for the representative peptides from the WT and ΔClpX strains.
Figure 6A proposed model showing the regulatory networks of ClpX in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. The upregulated proteins are highlighted in red and downregulated proteins are in blue. Arrows represent state transitions or metabolite fluxes.