| Literature DB >> 36247579 |
Jianqiang Lu1,2,3, Hongbin Qiu1,2,3,4, Qing Zhang4, Yubin Lan1,2,3, Panpan Wang5, Yue Wu4, Jiawei Mo1,2,3, Wadi Chen1,2,3, HongYu Niu1,2,3, Zhiyun Wu1,2,3.
Abstract
During the growth season, jujube trees are susceptible to infestation by the leaf mite, which reduces the fruit quality and productivity. Traditional monitoring techniques for mites are time-consuming, difficult, subjective, and result in a time lag. In this study, the method based on a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm extreme learning machine for estimation of leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) under leaf mite infestation in jujube was proposed. Initially, image data and SPAD values for jujube orchards under four severities of leaf mite infestation were collected for analysis. Six vegetation indices and SPAD value were chosen for correlation analysis to establish the estimation model for SPAD and the vegetation indices. To address the influence of colinearity between spectral bands, the feature band with the highest correlation coefficient was retrieved first using the successive projection algorithm. In the modeling process, the PSO correlation coefficient was initialized with the convergent optimal approximation of the fitness function value; the root mean square error (RMSE) of the predicted and measured values was derived as an indicator of PSO goodness-of-fit to solve the problems of ELM model weights, threshold randomness, and uncertainty of network parameters; and finally, an iterative update method was used to determine the particle fitness value to optimize the minimum error or iteration number. The results reflected that significant differences were observed in the spectral reflectance of the jujube canopy corresponding with the severity of leaf mite infestation, and the infestation severity was negatively correlated with the SPAD value of jujube leaves. The selected vegetation indices NDVI, RVI, PhRI, and MCARI were positively correlated with SPAD, whereas TCARI and GI were negatively correlated with SPAD. The accuracy of the optimized PSO-ELM model (R 2 = 0.856, RMSE = 0.796) was superior to that of the ELM model alone (R 2 = 0.748, RMSE = 1.689). The PSO-ELM model for remote sensing estimation of relative leaf chlorophyll content of jujube shows high fault tolerance and improved data-processing efficiency. The results provide a reference for the utility of UAV remote sensing for monitoring leaf mite infestation of jujube.Entities:
Keywords: PSO-ELM; SPA; SPAD; damage severity; hyperspectral; jujube; leaf mite
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247579 PMCID: PMC9562855 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1009630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Study area. (A) Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region; (B) Hotan area; (C) 224th regiment; (D) and (E) Image of the study area.
Figure 2Different degrees of leaf mite infestation in jujube severity.
Vegetation index information.
| Name | Formula | Comprehensive embodiment | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDVI | Integrated crop growth variability | Diseases detection |
| |
| RVI | Crops growth sensitivity | Chlorophyll estimation |
| |
| PhRI | Crop growth pattern | Chlorophyll estimation |
| |
| MCARI | Crops chlorophyll variations | LAI and chlorophyll estimation |
| |
| TCARI | Crops growth sensitivity | Chlorophyll estimation |
| |
| GI | Crops green variability | Leaf rust detection |
|
Statistical characteristics of chlorophyll content.
| Sample set | No. of samples | Min. | Max. | Mean. | Std. deviation | C.V/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1,200 | 20.80 | 67.50 | 46.17 | 9.66 | 20.93 |
| Modeling Set | 800 | 20.80 | 66.90 | 46.21 | 9.71 | 21.01 |
| Validation Set | 400 | 21.50 | 67.50 | 45.97 | 9.68 | 21.06 |
Figure 3Variations in SPAD values of jujube leaves for different leaf mite infestation levels.
Figure 4Spectral curves of jujube trees for different leaf mite damage indices.
Figure 5Correlation analysis between SPAD and vegetation index.
Correlation between SPAD values of canopy leaves and vegetation index of jujube trees.
| VI | Model |
| RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDVI | 0.668 | 1.062 | |
| RVI | 0.585 | 0.951 | |
| PhRI | 0.702 | 0.886 | |
| MCARI | 0.657 | 0.869 | |
| TCARI | 0.632 | 0.896 | |
| GI | 0.608 | 0.787 |
Figure 6(A) Raw spectra with SPAD correlation analysis; (B) First-order derivative spectra with SPAD correlation analysis.
Figure 7(A) Number of the best spectral variable for sample model; (B) Selection of characteristic hyperspectral bands.
Figure 8Flow chart of the PSO-ELM algorithm.
Figure 9ELM and PSO-ELM models Chlorophyll content inversion model.
Model comparison.
| Model | Modeling set | Validation set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RMSE |
| RMSE | |
| ELM | 0.748 | 1.689 | 0.681 | 1.566 |
| PSO-ELM | 0.856 | 0.796 | 0.825 | 0.862 |
Figure 10Inversion spatial distribution map of infestation severity of jujube mites.