| Literature DB >> 36247458 |
Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan1, Chitraa Tangavel2, Sri Vijay Anand K S1, Raveendran Muthurajan3, Sharon Miracle Nayagam2, Monica Steffi Matchado2, Sunmathi Rajendran2, Rishi Mugesh Kanna1, Ajoy Prasad Shetty1.
Abstract
Study design: The diversity of microflora inhabiting endplate (EP) and nucleus pulposus (NP) tissues of human intervertebral disc (IVD) was profiled through NGS-supported 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Sixteen EP and their corresponding NP were excised from the brain-dead voluntary organ donors with no clinical history of low back pain, and 12 herniated and 8 degenerated NP tissues isolated from the patients undergoing spinal surgery were subjected to study the alteration in the microbial diversity.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; disc degeneration; dysbiosis; endplate; intervertebral disc; microbiome; next-generation sequencing
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247458 PMCID: PMC9554234 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.927652
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Demographic details of the study population.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ND001 | ND | NP, EP | 43 | M | L3–L4 | 2 |
| ND002 | ND | NP, EP | 22 | M | L3–L4 | 3 |
| ND003 | ND | NP, EP | 22 | M | L4–L5 | 2 |
| ND004 | ND | NP, EP | 22 | M | L5–S1 | 2 |
| ND005 | ND | NP, EP | 55 | F | L4–L5 | 2 |
| ND006 | ND | NP, EP | 67 | M | L4–L5 | 2 |
| ND007 | ND | NP, EP | 63 | M | L4–L5 | 2 |
| ND008 | ND | NP, EP | 28 | M | L4–L5 | 1 |
| ND009 | ND | NP, EP | 56 | F | L3–L4 | 2 |
| ND010 | ND | NP, EP | 56 | F | L4–L5 | 2 |
| ND011 | ND | NP, EP | 56 | F | L5–S1 | 2 |
| ND012 | ND | NP, EP | 45 | M | L4–L5 | 2 |
| ND013 | ND | NP, EP | 32 | F | L2–L3 | 2 |
| ND014 | ND | NP, EP | 32 | F | L3–L4 | 3 |
| ND015 | ND | NP, EP | 32 | F | L4–L5 | 2 |
| ND016 | ND | NP, EP | 32 | F | L5–S1 | 3 |
| DD001 | DD | NP | 38 | F | L5–S1 | 5 |
| DD002 | DD | NP | 21 | M | L5–S1 | 3 |
| DD003 | DD | NP | 37 | M | L3-L4 | 3 |
| DD004 | DD | NP | 43 | M | L5–S1 | 4 |
| DD005 | DD | NP | 37 | M | L4–L5 | 3 |
| DD006 | DD | NP | 15 | M | L4–L5 | 1 |
| DD007 | DD | NP | 38 | M | L4–L5 | 4 |
| DD008 | DD | NP | 38 | M | L4–L5 | 4 |
| DD009 | DD | NP | 43 | F | L4–L5 | 4 |
| DD010 | DD | NP | 43 | F | L4–L5 | 4 |
| DD011 | DD | NP | 45 | F | L4–L5 | 4 |
| DD012 | DD | NP | 44 | F | L4–L5 | 4 |
| DD013 | DD | NP | 16 | F | L5–S1 | 4 |
| DD014 | DD | NP | 42 | M | L3–L4 | 5 |
| DD015 | DD | NP | 69 | F | L5–S1 | 4 |
| DD016 | DD | NP | 60 | M | L4–L5 | 4 |
| DD017 | DD | NP | 78 | M | L2–L3 | 4 |
| DD018 | DD | NP | 78 | M | L2–L3 | 4 |
| DD019 | DD | NP | 69 | F | L4–L5 | 5 |
| DD020 | DD | NP | 12 | M | L5–S1 | 2 |
ND, Normal Discs; DD, Diseased Discs; NP, Nucleus Pulposus; EP, End Plates; M, Male; F, Female.
Details of primers used for amplifying the variable regions of 16S rRNA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | V13 | 7F | AGAGTTTGATGMTGGCTCAG | 525 bp |
| 2 | 531R | TTACCGCGGCMGCSGGCAC | ||
| 3 | V46 | 513F | GTGCCAGCTGCCGCGGTAATAC | 554 bp |
| 4 | 1066R | CTGACGACAGCCATGCA | ||
| 5 | V79 | 1097F | GCAACGAGCGCAACCCC | 439 bp |
| 6 | 1535R | AAGGAGGTGATCCAGGC |
Figure 1Data analysis workflow deployed for the study.
Figure 2Abundance at Phylum level. Donut plots represent the relative abundance of phylum across ND (NP, EP) and DD (NP) groups. Proteobacteria was the most abundant phyla compared to other phyla.
Figure 3Comparison of bacterial phyla in NP and their respective EP of normal discs. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were slightly abundant in NP when compared to EP.
Figure 4Abundance of microbiome at Genus level (ND-NP vs. ND-EP). Stacked bar plots representing the relative abundance of phylum across ND-NP and ND-EP groups. Pseudomonas belonging to the phyla Proteobacteria were found to be dominant with higher abundance in both ND-NP (26%) and ND-EP (28%).
Figure 5Assessment of microbial diversity. (A) Two indices depict alpha diversity: observed OTUs and Shannon indices showing insignificant differences tested using a non-parametric test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (B) Beta diversity calculated using phylogenetic methods (UniFrac distance) shows a significant difference in the weighted (p, 0.006) index.
Figure 6Abundance of microbiome at Genus level (ND vs. DD). Stacked bar plots representing the relative abundance of phylum across ND-NP and DD-NP groups. Pseudomonas was the most abundant genera (84%) compared to all other identified genera.
Figure 7Correlations between dominant phyla and disease condition. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between dominant phyla, ND, and DD. (A) The relative abundance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria was correlated positively in ND and found significant, whereas, in DD, it demonstrated a weak positive correlation. (B) Firmicutes and Proteobacteria showed a weak positive correlation in ND, whereas DD demonstrated a significant negative correlation. (C) Actinobacteria and Firmicutes exhibited a positive correlation and were found significant in both ND and DD. (D) Ratio of Actinobacteria + Firmicutes: Proteobacteria showed a significant negative correlation during DD and a significant positive correlation in ND.