| Literature DB >> 36247332 |
Hui Teng1,2, Yani Mi3, Hongting Deng1,2, Yuanju He1,2, Shunxin Wang1,2, Chao Ai1,2, Hui Cao1,2, Baodong Zheng3, Lei Chen1,2.
Abstract
Heterocyclic amines (HCAs) are a group of carcinogenic substances produced in protein-rich poultry meat under high-temperature. Enzymatic acylation of anthocyanins (ACNs) is a reliable way to improve their stability, and we recently found the acylated cyaniding-3-O-glucose (cyanidin-3-6-cinnamoyl-glucoside, C3(6C)G) could effective inhibit the HCAs formation, but the underline mechanism was still obscure. Thus, the present study investigated the inhibitory effect ofC3(6C)G on HCAs formation in the food system (chicken breast) and to explore the potential mechanism. The results showed that C3(6C)G with different concentrations (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL) could significantly inhibit lipid oxidation and decrease the total HCAs content (P<0.05) in chicken breast meat patty after roasting. The samples with 0.1 mg/mL C3(6C)G had the best inhibition effect on total HCAs, with an inhibition rate of 28%, and the inhibition rates for IQ, Harman, TRP-P-2, PhIP and AαC were 34%, 46%, 100%, 54% and 41%, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Acylated anthocyanin; Chicken breast patty; Enzymatic acylation; Heterocyclic amine; Inhibition
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247332 PMCID: PMC9556857 DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.09.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Food Sci ISSN: 2665-9271
Fig. 1Acylation pathway of C3G with methyl cinnamate (A) and the primary (B) and the secondary (C) mass spectrometry of acylated anthocyanin.
Fig. 2(A) The effect of different concentrations of acylated anthocyanin (C3(6C)G) on the appearance of baked chicken breast patties, and HPLC chromatograms of 11 HAAs standards by (B) UV detection and (C) fluorescence detection. Peak information: 1.IQ; 2.MeIQ; 3.MeIQx; 4.4,8-DiMeIQx; 5.Norharman; 6.Harman; 7.Trp-P-2; 8.PhIP; 9.Trp-P-1; 10.AαC; 11.MeAαC.
Effects of different concentrations of C3(6C)G on cooking loss, moisture, pH, protein and lipid content of roasted chicken breast patties.
| Supplemented Conc. of C3(6C)G(mg/mL) | Cooking loss(%) | Moisture (g/g) | pH | Protein content(g/100g) | Lipid content(g/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 40.09 ± 0.37a | 0.58 ± 0.001d | 6.23 ± 0.02a | 38.46 ± 0.44a | 0.032 ± 0.003a |
| 0.1 | 38.29 ± 0.76 ab | 0.59 ± 0.007c | 6.20 ± 0.03a | 38.04 ± 0.15a | 0.031 ± 0.002a |
| 0.5 | 39.58 ± 0.95 ab | 0.60 ± 0.001b | 6.19 ± 0.05a | 37.19 ± 0.39b | 0.029 ± 0.002a |
| 1 | 37.66 ± 0.48b | 0.61 ± 0.003a | 6.17 ± 0.03a | 36.81 ± 0.29b | 0.029 ± 0.002a |
Effects of different concentrations of C3(6C)G on HCAs content of roasted chicken breast samples.
| A cylated ACNs con (mg/g) | IQ | MEIQ | MeIQx | 4,8-DiMeIQx | Norharman | Harman | Trp-P-2 | PhIP | Trp-P-1 | AαC | MeAαC | Total HAAs content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | (ng/g) | |
| 0.10 ± 0.02b | 0.23 ± 0.07c | 0.27 ± 0.03a | 2.19 ± 0.12a | 1.77 ± 0.04a | 0.55 ± 0.02a | 0.67 ± 0.05a | 0.40 ± 0.014a | 0.25 ± 0.01a | 1.42 ± 0.12c | Nd | 6.89 ± 0.39a | |
| 0.07 ± 0.00c | 0.25 ± 0.01a | 0.28 ± 0.07a | 1.38 ± 0.03b | 1.49 ± 0.04b | 0.30 ± 0.004b | Nd | 0.18 ± 0.02b | 0.18 ± 0.02b | 0.84 ± 0.09d | Nd | 4.96 ± 0.15d | |
| −34% | (-8%) | (-3%) | −37% | −16 | −46% | −100% | −54% | −30% | −41% | −28% | ||
| 0.11 ± 0.01a | 0.24 ± 0.03b | 0.20 ± 0.01b | 1.11 ± 0.07b | 1.43 ± 0.07b | 0.30 ± 0.003b | 0.37 ± 0.08a | 0.20 ± 0.016bc | 0.15 ± 0.01c | 1.63 ± 0.10b | Nd | 5.73 ± 0.2b | |
| (-14%) | (-4%) | −25% | −50% | −19% | −46% | −46% | −50% | −42% | (-15%) | −17% | ||
| 0.10 ± 0.00b | 0.23 ± 0.01c | 0.07 ± 0.001c | Nd | 1.24 ± 0.08c | 0.27 ± 0.002b | 0.65 ± 0.04a | 0.21 ± 0.013b | Nd | 2.40 ± 0.14a | Nd | 5.18 ± 0.08c | |
| −2% | (-1%) | −72% | 100% | −30.00% | −51% | −3% | −47% | −100% | (-69%) | −25% |
Fig. 3(a) Scores plot and (b) loadings plot of principle component analysis (PCA) of HCAs in roasted chicken breast patties supplemented with different concentrations of acylated anthocyanin (C3(6C)G).
Fig. 4Effects of different concentrations of acylated anthocyanin (C3(6C)G) on (A) creatinine content, (B) creatine content, (C) glucose content, and (D) TBARs content in roasted chicken breast samples (P < 0.05).
Fig. 5Heat map of associations between HCAs and their precursors in grilled chicken breast patties supplemented with acylated anthocyanin (C3(6C)G).