Junqing Li1, Feiran Wu1, Xing Xiao2, Li Su1, Xinjun Guo1, Jie Yao1, Huimin Zhu1. 1. Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Center, Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital) Zhengzhou 450016, China. 2. Scientific Research Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Shenzhen 518000, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ferroptosis plays vital roles in the pathogenesis of various malignant tumors. However, knowledge on roles of ferroptosis in osteosarcoma remains scarce. In the present study, a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis was performed aiming to identify ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs), construct a FRGs-based model predicting overall survival (OS), and assess the impact of these FRGs on the migration and invasion of osteosarcoma cells. METHODS: Initially, data regarding differentially expressed FRGs were obtained from the GSE160881 dataset. Prognostic significance and possible biological functions of these differentially expressed FRGs were comprehensively and systematically explored adopting a series of bioinformatics methods. The impact of cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) on migration and invasion of osteosarcoma cells were assessed using transwell assays. RESULTS: A total of 50 FRGs were differentially expressed. Four FRGs including G6PD, VEGFA, CBS, and HMOX1 were used to construct a model predicting OS in osteosarcoma patients. In the training cohort, patients with high risk had significantly poorer OS than those with low risk, which was also demonstrated in validation cohorts (GSE16091 and GSE39058). Furthermore, we established a clinically useful nomogram predicting OS using the four FRGs mentioned above. Risk scores were significantly associated with the proportion of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Additionally, we used the Cytoscape software to identify hub FRGs, and found that TP53, HMOX1, SLC7A11, HRAS, VEGFA, and TXNRD1 were hub FRGs. By performing in vitro cell culture experiments, we demonstrated that invasion and migration capability of Saos2 and HOS cells were significantly weakened after CBS knock down. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, gene signatures based on four FRGs were reliable in predicting OS in patients with osteosarcoma. Findings from this study will enable a better understanding of the prognostic significance of FRGs and tumor immunity in osteosarcoma. AJTR
OBJECTIVES: Ferroptosis plays vital roles in the pathogenesis of various malignant tumors. However, knowledge on roles of ferroptosis in osteosarcoma remains scarce. In the present study, a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis was performed aiming to identify ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs), construct a FRGs-based model predicting overall survival (OS), and assess the impact of these FRGs on the migration and invasion of osteosarcoma cells. METHODS: Initially, data regarding differentially expressed FRGs were obtained from the GSE160881 dataset. Prognostic significance and possible biological functions of these differentially expressed FRGs were comprehensively and systematically explored adopting a series of bioinformatics methods. The impact of cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) on migration and invasion of osteosarcoma cells were assessed using transwell assays. RESULTS: A total of 50 FRGs were differentially expressed. Four FRGs including G6PD, VEGFA, CBS, and HMOX1 were used to construct a model predicting OS in osteosarcoma patients. In the training cohort, patients with high risk had significantly poorer OS than those with low risk, which was also demonstrated in validation cohorts (GSE16091 and GSE39058). Furthermore, we established a clinically useful nomogram predicting OS using the four FRGs mentioned above. Risk scores were significantly associated with the proportion of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Additionally, we used the Cytoscape software to identify hub FRGs, and found that TP53, HMOX1, SLC7A11, HRAS, VEGFA, and TXNRD1 were hub FRGs. By performing in vitro cell culture experiments, we demonstrated that invasion and migration capability of Saos2 and HOS cells were significantly weakened after CBS knock down. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, gene signatures based on four FRGs were reliable in predicting OS in patients with osteosarcoma. Findings from this study will enable a better understanding of the prognostic significance of FRGs and tumor immunity in osteosarcoma. AJTR
Authors: Shan Zhu; Qiuhong Zhang; Xiaofan Sun; Herbert J Zeh; Michael T Lotze; Rui Kang; Daolin Tang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Matthew E Ritchie; Belinda Phipson; Di Wu; Yifang Hu; Charity W Law; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Andrew D Kelly; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Katherine A Janeway; Katherine E Hill; Eleanor Howe; Jeffrey Goldsmith; Kyle Kurek; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; Nancy Francoeur; Jian-Bing Fan; Craig April; Hal Schneider; Mark C Gebhardt; Aedin Culhane; John Quackenbush; Dimitrios Spentzos Journal: Genome Med Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Rong Tang; Jin Xu; Bo Zhang; Jiang Liu; Chen Liang; Jie Hua; Qingcai Meng; Xianjun Yu; Si Shi Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 17.388