| Literature DB >> 36247185 |
Heyu Meng1, Jianjun Ruan1, Yanqiu Chen2, Zhaohan Yan3, Xin Meng3, Xiangdong Li4, Jinsha Liu4, Cuiying Mao1,2,3,4, Ping Yang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Aim: Coronary heart disease is a major cause of mortality in developed and developing countries. Changes in the trace element concentration in the human body are one of the main reasons for the transition of the human body from a healthy to a diseased state. In this meta-analysis, we have studied the relationship between the reduction in serum zinc ion concentration and coronary heart disease.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247185 PMCID: PMC9560831 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4352484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res Pract ISSN: 2090-0597 Impact factor: 1.990
Figure 1Flowchart for article screening.
Baseline information. The gold standard for diagnosing CHD in the experimental group is coronary angiography.
| Id | Author | Country | Years | Is the method of diagnosing disease the gold standard | Types of test specimens for zinc ions | The mean value of zinc ion concentration in the control group | The standard deviation of zinc ion concentration in the control group | Number of the control group | Mean value of zinc ion concentration in the experimental group | The standard deviation of zinc ion concentration in the experimental group | Number of the experimental group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | Meng et al. [ | China | 2021 | Yes | Serum | 14.77 | 2.86 | 1103 | 14.18 | 2.87 | 1103 |
| No. 2 | Soinio et al. [ | Finland | 2007 | Yes | Serum | 15.8 | 2.5 | 796 | 15.2 | 2.5 | 254 |
| No. 3 | Basnet et al. [ | Nepal | 2020 | Yes | Serum | 13.7 mg | 3.3 | 233 | 13.5 mg | 2.6 | 233 |
| No. 4 | Cebi et al. [ | Turkey | 2011 | Yes | Serum | 0.91 | 0.18 | 20 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 30 |
| No. 5 | Hasanato [ | Saudi Arabia | 2020 | Yes | Serum | 15 | 3.2 | 50 | 13.5 | 1.9 | 50 |
| No. 6 | Islamoglu et al. [ | Turkey | 2011 | Yes | Serum | 0.67 ng/L | 0.14 | 34 | 0.61 ng/L | 0.16 | 33 |
| No. 7 | Li et al. [ | China | 1990 | Partly | Serum | 20.17 | 3.97 | 31 | 14.39 | 4.44 | 31 |
Quality assessment form.
| No. 1 | No. 2 | No. 3 | No. 4 | No. 5 | No. 6 | No. 7 | No. 8 | No. 9 | No. 10 | No. 11 | No. 12 | Total score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. [ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 |
| Rana-2020 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 |
| Islamoglu et al. [ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 |
| Soinio et al. [ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 19 |
| Meng et al. [ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 |
| Cebi et al. [ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| Basnet et al. [ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 21 |
Figure 2Forest diagram.
Figure 3Funnel chart the funnel plot is symmetrical on both sides and there is no publication bias.