| Literature DB >> 36247173 |
Jia Qu1.
Abstract
To solve the problems of low overall service quality of the university computer room, unstable environment control of the computer room, low adaptive adjustment ability, and high energy consumption. This article takes Chinese universities as an example to analyze university computer room supervision status, use the Internet of Things (IoT) to remotely and automatically monitor the computer room environment and energy consumption, and analyze the amount of data generated by the rapid increase of IoT edge devices. The method and model of edge computing in the computer room energy consumption monitoring system are proposed through research. The monitoring methods of critical parameters such as the computer room's thermal environment and energy consumption are given. Corresponding solutions for computer room management, testing, use, and energy-saving services are given. It provides a brand-new idea for energy saving in colleges and universities and network room security.Entities:
Keywords: Data analysis; Edge computing; Edge device; Energy consumption monitoring; IoT
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247173 PMCID: PMC9557828 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Application framework of University IoT.
Figure 2The architecture model of the Internet of Things in the network computer room of the university.
Figure 3Interaction sequence diagram between components of university IoT application framework.
Figure 4Edge computing model of IoT in Universities.
Figure 5University computer room monitoring system block diagram.
Figure 6Flow chart of edge device processing data.
The composition of the total energy consumption of the network room.
| Energy consumption parameters | Percentage of energy consumption |
|---|---|
| Main equipment energy consumption of the computer room | 28% |
| Air conditioning system energy consumption | 48% |
| Transmission equipment energy consumption | 11% |
| DC power cabinet energy consumption | 9% |
| Energy consumption of other equipment | 4% |
Symbol statistics.
| Symbolic names | Symbol Comment | Units |
|---|---|---|
| SHI | Supply heat index | N/A |
| HRI | Heat recovery index | N/A |
| &Q | Total heat loss to and from the cooling airflow | kilojoule (KJ) |
| Q | Effective Heat Loss for Refrigerating Gas Flow | kilojoule (KJ) |
| F | Total energy consumption of network computer room in colleges and universities | kilojoule (KJ) |
| PUE | Power Usage Effectiveness | N/A |
| Et | Air conditioner energy consumption under-sampling period t | Kilowatt-hour (kWh) |
| θt | Air Conditioning Energy Consumption Utilization Factor | N/A |
| SHIt | Regeneration index at one sampling period | N/A |
| qi | The total power of the ith cycle air conditioning system | Kilowatt (KW) |
| Pt | Air conditioner power consumption at time t | Kilowatt-hour (kWh) |
Figure 7System packet loss test.
Figure 8System delay at different sampling periods.
Data transmission time comparison table.
| Number of data (pieces) | XML Consumption time (ms) | JSON Consumption time (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 60 | 17 |
| 400 | 70 | 24 |
| 1000 | 98 | 45 |
| 1600 | 110 | 56 |
| 2000 | 128 | 78 |
Data parsing time comparison table.
| Number of data displayed on the WEB (pieces) | XML Consumption time (ms) | JSON Consumption time (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 13 | 2 |
| 400 | 14 | 4 |
| 1000 | 19 | 7 |
| 1600 | 22 | 10 |
The above test results show that the simple JSON data format can greatly compress the data transmission volume and reduce redundancy in this solution. The data transmission and parsing efficiency are better than the XML data format used in the traditional network room.
Comparison of protocol standards.
| performance metrics | HTTP | MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Yes | Yes |
| Adapt to unstable networks | No | Yes |
| Low power consumption | No | Yes |
| Millions of connected clients | No | Yes |
| Firewall fault tolerance | Yes | Yes |
Comparison of results of transmission protocol performance.
| Network protocol | Best-case response time (ms) | Worst-case response time (ms) | Average response time (ms) | Handling capacity (M/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP | 112 | 200 | 144 | 2.1 |
| MQTT | 35 | 53 | 45 | 8.9 |
Comparison of transmission network performance.
| Transmission network | Upload speed (M/s) | Scope of application | Network cost | Transmission stability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIFI | 22 | High frequency stable transmission | Low | High |
| 4G | 13 | High frequency stable transmission | High | High |
| 5G | 58 | High frequency stable transmission | Low | High |
Computer room energy consumption comparison.
| Machine room parameters | Energy consumption before monitoring (kWh) | Energy consumption after monitoring (kWh) |
|---|---|---|
| Host equipment | 625.3 | 590.1 |
| Air Conditioning System | 481.7 | 418.2 |
| Transmission device | 46.5 | 43.4 |
| Power supply cabinet | 73 | 71.5 |
| Other equipment | 190 | 186.2 |
| Total energy consumption of the equipment room | 1415.5 | 1309.4 |
| PUE value | 2.26 | 2.21 |
Energy saving effect analysis.
| Date | Power consumption before system use (2020) (kWh) | Power consumption after system use (2021) (kWh) | YoY decline |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 41357 | 34465 | 16.66% |
| February | 43357 | 36820 | 15.08% |
| March | 42983 | 31062 | 27.73% |
| April | 49915 | 39900 | 20.06% |
| May | 50035 | 40001 | 20.04% |
| June | 51347 | 39978 | 22.14% |
| July | 53456 | 40015 | 25.14% |
| August | 53445 | 41087 | 23.12% |
| September | 52106 | 40234 | 27.78% |
| October | 49768 | 39098 | 21.44% |
| November | 43567 | 35690 | 18.08% |
| December | 42023 | 35078 | 16.53% |
Advantages and disadvantages of analysis.
| Energy Consumption Monitoring of University Network Computer Room | Energy consumption monitoring of computer rooms in colleges based on the Internet of Things and edge computing technology | |
|---|---|---|
| The basis for energy saving | No | Yes |
| Energy-saving and emission reduction effect | Poor | Good |
| Equipment safety analysis | No | Yes |
| Data standardization | No | Yes |
| Network resource consumption | High | Low |
| Operation and maintenance cost | High | Low |
| Monitoring object | Little | More |