| Literature DB >> 36246948 |
Mitchell A Kirby1, John J Pitre1, Hong-Cin Liou1, David S Li1, Ruikang K Wang1,2, Ivan Pelivanov1, Matthew O'Donnell1, Tueng T Shen1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare noncontact acoustic microtapping (AμT) OCT elastography (OCE) with destructive mechanical tests to confirm corneal elastic anisotropy. Design: Ex vivo laboratory study with noncontact AμT-OCE followed by mechanical rheometry and extensometry. Participants: Inflated cornea of whole-globe porcine eyes (n = 9).Entities:
Keywords: AμT, acoustic microtapping; BSS, balanced saline solution; Cornea; Elastic anisotropy; IOP, intraocular pressure; NITI model; NITI, nearly incompressible transversely isotropic; OCE, OCT elastography; OCT elastography; Young’s modulus
Year: 2021 PMID: 36246948 PMCID: PMC9560544 DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ophthalmol Sci ISSN: 2666-9145
Figure 1A, Representative display of an acoustic microtapping OCT elastography system to generate and image elastic waves in the cornea. The purple triangle represents noncontact acoustic loading through air and the red line-scan displays the approximate OCT scan range. B, Diagram showing guided elastic waves propagating in a nearly incompressible transversely isotropic material such as the cornea. C, Diagram showing that a solution to the dispersion equation was solved iteratively in the Fourier spectrum to reconstruct both elastic moduli, μ (E = 3μ, under the assumption of corneal tensile isotropy) and G, that most closely resemble the measured waveform in the cornea. D, Representation of ex vivo parallel plate rheometry of the cornea. E, Material model demonstrating assumed geometries and shear stress-strain relationships. F, Calculation of the complex shear modulus G∗ using measured shear stress and strain. G, Representation of corneal strips loaded in an extensometer. H, Material model demonstrating assumed geometries and loading in tensile testing. I, Graph showing calculation of the Young’s modulus, E, in extension testing.
Figure 2Moduli (E, assuming tensile isotropy, and G) estimates from acoustic microtapping OCT elastography (AμT-OCE; black), parallel-plate rheometry (blue), and strip extension (red). The red box denotes the range of elastic moduli measured at strains of 1% to 10% and the red dots denote the equivalent strain estimate at intraocular pressures (IOPs) representative of in vivo conditions (detailed in Supplemental Methods). The darker blue box is the storage shear modulus (G′) measured via rheometry with the scleral ring attached, and the purple box corresponds to values appropriately scaled to account for the apparent stiffness from inclusion of the scleral ring (detailed in Supplemental Methods).