| Literature DB >> 36246879 |
Jiayue Liu1, Lingzhou Kong1, Mengting Shao1, Changhai Sun1, Changxu Li1, Yanyan Wang1, Xue Chai1, Yuliang Wang1, Yu Zhang1, Xiaoliang Li2, Hong Zhao1.
Abstract
Background: At present, the incidence of alcoholic fatty liver disease (AFLD) is increasing year by year, and numerous studies have confirmed that liver diseases are closely related to intestinal flora. Seabuckthorn and Astragalus membranaceus, as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with the homology of medicine and food, have good liver protection, and their polysaccharides can regulate the intestinal flora. Here, we studied the effects of HRP, APS and the combination of the two polysaccharides on the intestinal flora of AFLD mice, which provided scientific basis for the treatment of AFLD with the two polysaccharides. Materials and methods: Thirty Kunming (KM) mice were randomly divided into the control group (Con), the model group (Mod), the HRP treatment group (HRP), the APS treatment group (APS), and HRP+APS treatment group (HRP+APS), with six mice in each group. The AFLD model was constructed by continuous intragastric administration of 42% vol Niulanshan ethanol solution for 28 days, and the mice in each polysaccharide group were given corresponding drugs. The levels of AST, ALT, TC and TG in serum of mice were measured. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing technique was used to determine the diversity and richness of intestinal flora, and the relative abundance of intestinal flora at phylum level and genus level of the mice in each group.Entities:
Keywords: Astragalus; Seabuckthorn; alcoholic fatty liver; intestinal flora; polysaccharide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36246879 PMCID: PMC9559367 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1018557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Flowchart of the experimental design.
Figure 2The effects of HRP, APS and the combination of HRP and APS on the body weight and histopathological change of liver in AFLD mice. (A) Weight changes of mice during the experiment. (B) Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining of hepatocytes (Original magnification, ×400, n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). ## P < 0.01 vs. Con; * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 vs. Mod.
Figure 3The effects of HRP, APS and the combination of HRP and APS on serum biochemical indexes of AFLD mice. (A) Serum AST. (B) Serum ALT. (C) Serum TC. (D) Serum TG. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). ## P < 0.01 vs. Con; ** P < 0.01 vs. Mod.
Figure 4Effects of HRP, APS and the combination of HRP and APS on the number of OTUs and alpha diversity in mice intestinal mucosal bacteria. (A) The number of observed OTUs. (B) Observed species index. (C) Chao1 index. (D) Simpson index. (E) Faith’s PD index. # P < 0.05 vs. Con.
Figure 5Effect of HRP, APS and the combination of HRP and APS on the beta diversity of mice intestinal mucosal bacteria. (A) PCA and (B) NMDS.
Figure 6Effect of HRP, APS and the combination of HRP and APS on relative abundance of intestinal flora in AFLD mice. (A) Relative abundance at the phylum level. (B) Histogram of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. (C) Relative abundance at the genus level. ##P < 0.01 vs. Con; **P < 0.01 vs. Mod.
Figure 7Heat map of the correlation of gut microbiota with indicators of liver injury in AFLD mice. Significant differences are indicated by asterisks, * P < 0.05.