| Literature DB >> 36246725 |
Habila Obidah Abert1,2, Hauwa Umaru Aduwamai1, Saminu Shehu Adamu1,3.
Abstract
The effect of iron oxide nanoparticles (FeONPs) synthesized using Spinacia oleracea leaf extract on Triton X-100-induced atherosclerosis in white Wistar rats was determined. FeONPs were characterized to determine their size, structure, composition, and shape. In vitro antioxidant activity of FeONPs against 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) was determined. Atherosclerosis was induced by intraperitoneal administration of 5% Triton X-100 (100 mg/kg body weight) for 14 days. Group 1 received standard rat chow and water. Group 2 received 100 mg/kg body weight of Triton X-100 and a standard diet. Group 3 received 100 mg/kg body weight of Triton X-100 followed by 20 mg/kg body weight of atorvastatin for 21 days. Groups 4, 5, and 6 received 100 mg/kg body weight Triton X-100 was followed by variable concentrations of 100, 300, and 500 µg/kg body weight FeONPs, respectively, for 21 days. Blood samples were analyzed for lipid, liver, antioxidant, and cardiovascular markers. Histopathology of the heart was also examined. Characterization revealed the amorphous nature, functional groups, and clustered topography of FeONPs. An upregulated antioxidant activity of FeONPs was observed in a dose-dependent manner. Administration of Triton X-100 showed elevated levels of lipid biomarkers except for high-density lipoprotein (HDL), which decreased in group 2 in comparison to group 1. Liver, antioxidant, and cardiovascular biomarkers all significantly increased. The structural alteration was observed in the heart tissue following histopathology examination. Administration of FeONPs significantly decreased all biomarkers and increased the level of HDL. Also, tissue architecture was restored. Our findings demonstrated that FeONPs were effective in ameliorating Triton X-100-induced atherosclerosis in rats.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36246725 PMCID: PMC9568327 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9311227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Res Int
Figure 1X-ray diffraction spectrum of iron oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 2(a) FTIR spectrum of Spinacea oleracea leaf extract. (b) FTIR spectrum of synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 3SEM images of synthesized Iron oxide nanoparticles at (a) 20 μm, (b) 30 μm, (c) 80 μm and (d) 100 μm respectively.
DPPH radical scavenging activity of iron oxide nanoparticles (% inhibition).
| Concentration ( | FeO NPs | Ascorbic acid |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 35.08 ± 0.92a | 46.04 ± 0.70 |
| 40 | 42.16 ± 0.91a | 58.23 ± 0.79 |
| 60 | 53.81 ± 1.64a | 66.05 ± 0.78 |
| 80 | 60.22 ± 0.52a | 75.36 ± 0.52 |
| 100 | 76.33. ±0.57a | 87.81 ± 0.30 |
Values are Mean ± SEM (n = 5). a = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than ascorbic acid at the same concentration.
Effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on lipid profile parameters in mg/dL.
| Group | TC | TG | HDL | LDL | AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 110.36 ± 1.48bf | 87.35 ± 0.87bf | 69.06 ± 0.95 | 23.83 ± 1.11bf | 0.59 ± 0.03bf |
| Negative | 245.26 ± 1.73ac | 220.75 ± 1.34ac | 20.03 ± 0.39d | 181.08 ± 1.31ac | 11.24 ± 0.02ac |
| Standard (atorvastatin | 114.26 ± 1.78bjf | 90.85 ± 1.48bjf | 71.27 ± 1.43 | 25.22 ± 1.16bjf | 0.60 ± 0.04bf |
| 100 | 191.02 ± 1.69abc | 170.51 ± 0.89abc | 50.05 ± 0.06dej | 106.85 ± 1.50abc | 2.82 ± 0.05abc |
| 300 | 156.07 ± 0.32abc | 134.02 ± 1.09abc | 59.22 ± 0.35dej | 70.05 ± 0.65abc | 1.64 ± 0.04abc |
| 500 | 121.91 ± 1.24abcf | 98.27 ± 1.37abcf | 68.70 ± 0.26de | 33.56 ± 1.19abcf | 0.77 ± 0.05abc |
Values are Mean ± SEM (n = 5). a = significantly (p < 0.05) higher than sham. b = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than negative control. c = significantly (p < 0.05) higher than standard control. d = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than normal control. e = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than standard control. f = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than other treatment groups.
Effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on liver biomarkers in U/L
| Group | ALT | AST | ALP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 28.65 ± 0.21bd | 33.91 ± 0.88bd | 89.45 ± 1.16 |
| Negative | 74.59 ± 0.91ac | 67.93 ± 0.96ac | 98.13 ± 1.12 |
| Standard (atorvastatin) | 28.95 ± 0.98bd | 35.24 ± 0.18bd | 88.26 ± 1.16 |
| 100 | 50.90 ± 0.65abc | 60.43 ± 0.87abc | 95.54 ± 0.72 |
| 300 | 46.11 ± 0.89abc | 53.07 ± 0.65abc | 92.94 ± 0.38 |
| 500 | 39.30 ± 0.72abcd | 44.25 ± 1.06abcd | 90.69 ± 0.70 |
Values are Mean ± SEM (n = 5). a = significantly (p < 0.05) higher than sham. b = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than negative control. c = significantly (p < 0.05) higher than standard control. d = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than other treatment groups.
Effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on serum antioxidant markers.
| Group | SOD units per millilitre (U/ml) | CAT micromole per hydrogen peroxide per minute (µmol/H2O2/min) | GPx units per millilitre (U/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 2.99 ± 0.05b | 57.58 ± 0.84b | 36.03 ± 2.97b |
| Negative | 1.31 ± 0.05adc | 30.72 ± 0.74adc | 19.43 ± 0.60ac |
| Standard (atorvastatin) | 2.93 ± 0.05b | 56.02 ± 0.49b | 39.44 ± 0.49b |
| 100 | 1.99 ± 0.03ab | 44.35 ± 0.25ab | 20.08 ± 0.33ac |
| 300 | 2.23 ± 0.04ab | 49.81 ± 0.39ab | 20.99 ± 0.37ac |
| 500 | 2.89 ± 0.04b | 55.69 ± 0.46b | 22.02 ± 0.66ac |
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). a = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than sham. b = significantly (p < 0.05) higher than negative control. c = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than standard control. d = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than other treatment groups.
Effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on serum cardiovascular markers in ng/ml.
| Group | CK-MB | CTnI | Myoglobin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 3.67 ± 0.09bd | 0.03 ± 0.01bd | 56.46 ± 2.31bd |
| Negative | 12.70 ± 0.29ac | 0.87 ± 0.10ac | 93.64 ± 1.54ac |
| Standard (atorvastatin) | 3.89 ± 0.08b | 0.05 ± 0.01b | 59.49 ± 1.94b |
| 100 | 8.87 ± 0.09abc | 0.23 ± 0.06abc | 86.34 ± 0.60ac |
| 300 | 6.95 ± 0.04abc | 0.16 ± 0.08abc | 70.40 ± 0.55abc |
| 500 | 4.86 ± 0.27bcd | 0.09 ± 0.02bd | 61.96 ± 1.24bd |
Values are Mean ± SEM (n = 5). a = significantly (p < 0.05) higher than normal control. b = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than negative control. c = significantly (p < 0.05) higher than standard control. d = significantly (p < 0.05) lower than other treatment groups.
Figure 4(a) Cross section of the heart of sham group. (b) Cross section of the heart of negative control group. (c) Cross section of the heart of standard control group. (d) Cross section of the heart of 100μg/kg body weight FeONPs group. (e) Cross section of the heart of 300μg/kg body weight FeONPs group. (f) Cross section of the heart of 500μg/kg bw FeONPs group.