Literature DB >> 36246633

HRD-MILN: Accurately estimate tumor homologous recombination deficiency status from targeted panel sequencing data.

Xuwen Wang1,2, Ying Xu1,2, Yinbin Zhang3, Shenjie Wang1,2, Xuanping Zhang1,2, Xin Yi4, Shuqun Zhang3, Jiayin Wang1,2.   

Abstract

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a critical feature guiding drug and treatment selection, mainly for ovarian and breast cancers. As it cannot be directly observed, HRD status is estimated on a small set of genomic instability features from sequencing data. The existing methods often perform poorly when handling targeted panel sequencing data; however, the targeted panel is the most popular sequencing strategy in clinical practices. Thus, we proposed HRD-MILN to overcome the computational challenges from targeted panel sequencing. HRD-MILN incorporated a multi-instance learning framework to discover as many loss of heterozygosity (LOH) associated with HRD status to cluster as possible. Then the HRD score is obtained based on the association between the LOHs and the cluster in the sample to be estimated, and finally, the HRD status is estimated based on the score. In comparison experiments on targeted panel sequencing data, the Precision of HRD-MILN could achieve 87%, significantly improved from 63% reported by the existing methods, where the highest margin of improvement reached 14%. It also presented advantages on whole exome sequencing data. Based on our best knowledge, HRD-MILN is the first practical tool for estimating HRD status from targeted panel sequencing data and could benefit clinical applications.
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Xu, Zhang, Wang, Zhang, Yi, Zhang and Wang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer genomics; homologous recombination deficiency; multi-instance learning model; sequencing data analysis; targeted panel sequencing

Year:  2022        PMID: 36246633      PMCID: PMC9554509          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.990244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.772


  50 in total

1.  FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Ronglai Shen; Venkatraman E Seshan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Niraparib monotherapy for late-line treatment of ovarian cancer (QUADRA): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Kathleen N Moore; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Melissa A Geller; David Scott Miller; Noelle Cloven; Gini F Fleming; Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Masoud Azodi; Paul DiSilvestro; Amit M Oza; Mihaela Cristea; Jonathan S Berek; John K Chan; Bobbie J Rimel; Daniela E Matei; Yong Li; Kaiming Sun; Katarina Luptakova; Ursula A Matulonis; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with BRCA1 or RAD51C methylated versus mutated ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah S Bernards; Kathryn P Pennington; Maria I Harrell; Kathy J Agnew; Rochelle L Garcia; Barbara M Norquist; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Swisher; Kevin K Lin; Amit M Oza; Clare L Scott; Heidi Giordano; James Sun; Gottfried E Konecny; Robert L Coleman; Anna V Tinker; David M O'Malley; Rebecca S Kristeleit; Ling Ma; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; James D Brenton; Janiel M Cragun; Ana Oaknin; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Maria I Harrell; Elaina Mann; Scott H Kaufmann; Anne Floquet; Alexandra Leary; Thomas C Harding; Sandra Goble; Lara Maloney; Jeff Isaacson; Andrew R Allen; Lindsey Rolfe; Roman Yelensky; Mitch Raponi; Iain A McNeish
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency (GeparOLA study).

Authors:  P A Fasching; T Link; J Hauke; F Seither; C Jackisch; P Klare; S Schmatloch; C Hanusch; J Huober; A Stefek; S Seiler; W D Schmitt; C Uleer; G Doering; K Rhiem; A Schneeweiss; K Engels; C Denkert; R K Schmutzler; E Hahnen; M Untch; N Burchardi; J-U Blohmer; S Loibl
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  V Abkevich; K M Timms; B T Hennessy; J Potter; M S Carey; L A Meyer; K Smith-McCune; R Broaddus; K H Lu; J Chen; T V Tran; D Williams; D Iliev; S Jammulapati; L M FitzGerald; T Krivak; J A DeLoia; A Gutin; G B Mills; J S Lanchbury
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Eric Talevich; A Hunter Shain; Thomas Botton; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  Genomic scars as biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency and drug response in breast and ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Johnathan A Watkins; Sheeba Irshad; Anita Grigoriadis; Andrew N J Tutt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  MutationalPatterns: comprehensive genome-wide analysis of mutational processes.

Authors:  Francis Blokzijl; Roel Janssen; Ruben van Boxtel; Edwin Cuppen
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.