| Literature DB >> 36246561 |
Jing Qi1, Jiawei Yan1, Muhammad Idrees2, Saeedah Musaed Almutairi3, Rabab Ahmed Rasheed4, Usama Ahmed Hussein5, Mostafa A Abdel-Maksoud3, Ran Wang1, Jun Huang1, Chen Huang1, Nana Wang1, Dongping Huang1, Yuan Hui6, Chen Li7.
Abstract
Background: The epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) gene has been shown to be significantly associated with the prognosis of solid tumors; however, there is a lack of models for the EMT gene to predict the prognosis of AML patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36246561 PMCID: PMC9568336 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7826393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.464
Top 20 candidate genes of univariate Cox regression analysis results.
| Candidate genes | Univariate Cox regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| ||
| Low | High | |||
| PTP4A3 | 1.021726223 | 1.014321763 | 1.029184734 | 6.96E-09 |
| CBR1 | 1.03820974 | 1.025067827 | 1.051520139 | 7.96E-09 |
| ROR1 | 8.179147658 | 3.372478696 | 19.83658384 | 3.33E-06 |
| ETS2 | 1.005307794 | 1.00295453 | 1.00766658 | 9.55E-06 |
| HIP1 | 1.014075523 | 1.007666162 | 1.020525653 | 1.56E-05 |
| PLA2G4A | 1.021276597 | 1.011531433 | 1.031115646 | 1.68E-05 |
| SRC | 1.041105298 | 1.021883572 | 1.060688587 | 2.27E-05 |
| KRT7 | 2.305624508 | 1.5494694 | 3.43079016 | 3.80E-05 |
| HOXB7 | 1.017736146 | 1.008665558 | 1.026888302 | 0.000118629 |
| PEBP4 | 9.238964316 | 2.976207974 | 28.68027449 | 0.000119556 |
| UCP2 | 1.001228192 | 1.00059024 | 1.001866551 | 0.000160359 |
| CDK5 | 1.025260006 | 1.011990418 | 1.03870359 | 0.000174577 |
| CCL22 | 1.521162335 | 1.219639632 | 1.897228318 | 0.000198028 |
| RNF8 | 1.147867946 | 1.066800293 | 1.235096044 | 0.000223934 |
| LIMA1 | 1.073789995 | 1.033493977 | 1.115657159 | 0.00026414 |
| SPRR2A | 18025860.7 | 2044.952808 | 1.58894E+11 | 0.000312518 |
| BMP2 | 1.363657752 | 1.150470944 | 1.616348917 | 0.000348845 |
| LYPD3 | 1.593586359 | 1.231965357 | 2.061354624 | 0.000387329 |
| STIM2 | 1.04818812 | 1.021292087 | 1.075792468 | 0.000387406 |
| BAG3 | 1.030482529 | 1.013356191 | 1.047898312 | 0.000445426 |
Figure 1Random survival forest select candidate EMT-related prognosis genes. The error estimate probability (a), the bar plot of genes (b), and candidate important genes (importance >0.45) (c).
Figure 2Lasso regression model select candidate EMT-related prognosis genes. Lambda takes the minimum value; a total of eight candidate genes are selected (a), and (b) demonstrates the prognostic value of these eight genes.
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of candidate genes.
| Candidate genes | Multivariate Cox regression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef | HR | 95% CI |
| ||
| Low | High | ||||
| CBR1 | 0.0286 | 1.0290 | 1.0147 | 1.0436 | 6.62E-05 |
| HS3ST3B1 | −0.0458 | 0.9552 | 0.9131 | 0.9993 | 0.0466 |
| LIMA1 | 0.0415 | 1.0423 | 1.0078 | 1.0781 | 0.0160 |
| MIR573 | −0.0134 | 0.9867 | 0.9716 | 1.0020 | 0.0888 |
| PTP4A3 | 0.0145 | 1.0146 | 1.0064 | 1.0228 | 0.0004 |
Figure 3Construct model in training data set, based on the Cox regulation model, a five EMT-related gene signature was constructed: the risk score and the survival status distribution (a) and the heat map of five genes in high- and low-risk group (b). The survival curve show high-risk score patients with a worse outcome, compared with low-risk score patients (c). The area under the receiver operating characteristic of model was 0.868 (d).
Figure 4Validate model in test data set, a five EMT-related gene signature was validated: the risk score and the survival status distribution (a) and the heat map of five genes in high- and low-risk group (b). The survival curve show high-risk score patients with a worse outcome, compared with low-risk score patients (c). The area under the receiver operating characteristic of model was 0.815 (d).