| Literature DB >> 36246371 |
Xueqin Zhang1,2,3,4, Haoqi Guo1, Wenhan Luo1,2,3, Guojian Chen1,2,3, Naiyu Xiao1,2,3, Gengsheng Xiao1,2,3, Chuanfu Liu4.
Abstract
Cellulose-based functional composite films can be a good substitute for conventional plastic packaging to ensure food safety. In this study, the semi-transparent, mechanical strengthened, UV-shielding, antibacterial and biocompatible films were developed from hydroxyethyl cellulose Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and ε-polylysine (ε-PL) were respectively used as reinforcing agent and antibacterial agent, and chemical cross-linking among these three components were constructed using epichlorohydrin The maximum tensile strength and elongation at break were 95.9 ± 4.1 MPa and 148.8 ± 2.6%, respectively. TG-FTIR and XRD analyses indicated that chemical structure of the composite films could be well controlled by varying component proportion. From UV-Vis analysis, the optimum values of the percentage of blocking from UV-A and UV-B and ultraviolet protection factor values were 98.35%, 99.99% and 60.25, respectively. Additionally, the composite films exhibited good water vapor permeability, swelling behavior, antibacterial activity and biocompatibility. In terms of these properties, the shelf life of grapes could be extended to 6 days after packing with the composite film.Entities:
Keywords: UV-shielding; antibacterial activity; chemical cross-linking; composite film; hydroxyethyl cellulose
Year: 2022 PMID: 36246371 PMCID: PMC9557200 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.989893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
SCHEME 1Process for the preparation of HEC-based composite films.
FIGURE 1Tensile strength and elongation at break of the composite films with different contents of PVA (A,D), ECH (B,E) and ε-PL (C,F). All values in the same figure with different superscripts are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
FIGURE 2FT-IR spectra (A), TGA-DTG curves (B) and three-dimensional surface graphs for the FTIR spectra of the evolved gases produced by pure HEC film (C), H10P30L10E (D) and H30P30L10E (E) pyrolysis.
FIGURE 3XRD patterns (A,B) of HEC, PVA and the composite films reinforced with different PVA contents.
FIGURE 4Digital photograph of the composite films (A); Surface (B) and cross-section (C) morphologies of films obtained from SEM.
FIGURE 5UV‐Vis light transmittance spectra (A,B,C), water vapor permeability (D,E,F) and swelling ratio (G,H,I) of the composite films.
FIGURE 6Antibacterial activity of the composite films against E. coli and S. aureus.
FIGURE 7Cell viability results of the NIH‐3T3 cells of H10P30L10E and H30P30L10E composite films after 24 and 48 h.
FIGURE 8Photograph of fresh grape and preserved grapes after 6 days.