| Literature DB >> 36246237 |
Yong Tian1,2, Guoqin Li1,2, Shuo Zhang1,2, Tao Zeng1,2, Li Chen1,2, Zhengrong Tao1,2, Lizhi Lu1,2.
Abstract
Fermented plant product (FPP) is a kind of functional complex containing probiotics and a variety of bioactive substances, which has multiple physiological functions. However, there is no systematic appraisal of FPP as a feed additive for laying hens. This study was conducted to evaluate the utilization of FPP in laying hens. A total of 120 healthy 34-week-old Xianju layers with similar body weight and egg production were randomly allocated into two dietary treatments with four replicates per treatment and 15 birds per replicate for 8 weeks. The dietary treatments included the basal diet without FPP (CON group) and CON diet supplemented with 500 mg/kg of FPP (FPP group). Compared with the CON group, the egg production and egg mass were significantly increased in the FPP group from 38 to 42 and 34 to 42 weeks of age (P < 0.05). Birds fed with the diet containing 500 mg/kg FPP had higher albumen height (P < 0.01) and Haugh unit (P < 0.05) than those of the controls. FPP supplementation significantly increased the villus height (VH) and crypt depth (CD) in the jejunum of laying hens (P < 0.01), as well as the ratio of VH to CD (P < 0.05). The mRNA expression of tight junctions showed that dietary supplementation with FPP significantly increased the expression levels of Occludin (P < 0.01) and ZO-1 (P < 0.05) in jejunum of hens compared to the control group. In addition, dietary supplementation with FPP influenced cecal microbiota of laying hens, which was characterized by the changes in the microbial community composition, including the increased abundances of Firmicutes, Faecalibacterium, Oscillospira, Clostridium, Ruminococcus, and Coprococcus, along with the decreased abundance of Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Phascolarctobacterium, Odoribacter, Desulfovibrio, and Mucispirillum. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed that bacteria such as Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, and Blautia were significantly and positively correlated with the intestinal barrier markers (P < 0.05), with extremely significant correlations between Ruminococcus and ZO-1, and Coprococcus and Occludin (P < 0.01), whereas Desulfovibrio had a negative correlation with the expression of Occludin (P < 0.05). As it can be concluded, FPP supplementation increased the egg production, egg mass, albumen height, and Haugh unit of laying hens, and improved intestinal health by ameliorating intestinal barrier function, which may be partially attributed to the regulation of cecal microbiota. Our findings suggest that FPP has the potential to be used as a feed additive to promote the performance of layers.Entities:
Keywords: cecal microbiota; fermented plant product; intestinal barrier; laying hens; production performance
Year: 2022 PMID: 36246237 PMCID: PMC9561940 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.955115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Ingredients and nutrient levels of basal diet for the laying hens.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Ingredients (%) | |
| Corn | 55.00 |
| Soybean meal | 25.00 |
| Rice bran | 4.00 |
| Fish meal | 3.00 |
| Oyster shell | 3.00 |
| Tricalcium phosphate | 6.50 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 1.20 |
| Salt | 0.30 |
| Premix | 2.00 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels | |
| Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg) | 11.30 |
| Crude protein (%) | 17.00 |
| Calcium (%) | 3.50 |
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.52 |
| Lysine (%) | 0.80 |
| Methionine + cystine (%) | 0.65 |
Premix provided as following (per kilogram of diet): vitamin A, 8,000 IU; vitamin D3, 2,200 IU; vitamin E, 10 IU; vitamin K3, 1.5 mg; vitamin B1, 1.5 mg; vitamin B2, 3.5 mg; vitamin B6, 3 mg; vitamin B12, 0.1 mg; nicotinic acid, 30 mg; pantothenic acid, 8 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; Cu, 8 mg; Fe, 80 mg; Mn, 60 mg; Zn, 40 mg; I, 0.18 mg; Se, 0.3 mg. The levels of crude protein, calcium, phosphorus, lysine, and methionine + cystine were measured values, while metabolizable energy level was obtained by calculation.
Primer sequences of chicken Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1, and β-actin genes used for RT-qPCR.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| F: GCTGAGATGGACAGCATCAA R: CCTCTGCCACATCCTGGTAT | NM-205128 |
|
| F: TAAGGGGAAGCCAACTGATG R: GAAGGAGCAGGAGGAGGAGT | XM-413773 |
|
| F: CATGAAGTGCATGGAGGATG R: GTGCTGACAGACCTGCAATG | NM-001013611 |
|
| F: TCGCACTGGATTTCGAGCA R: CACCTGAACCTCTCATTGCCA | NM-205518 |
Effects of FPP on the production performance of laying hens.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 34–38 weeks of age | |||
| Egg production, % | 70.89 ± 0.82 | 72.26 ± 0.85 | 0.246 |
| Egg mass, g/d/hen | 31.57 ± 0.37 | 32.29 ± 0.39 | 0.179 |
| Feed intake, g/d/hen | 90.60 ± 0.26 | 90.46 ± 0.24 | 0.696 |
| FCR, g feed/g egg | 2.92 ± 0.04 | 2.86 ± 0.04 | 0.289 |
| 38–42 weeks of age | |||
| Egg production, % | 64.94 ± 0.78 | 67.80 ± 0.91 | 0.018 |
| Egg mass, g/d/hen | 29.42 ± 0.36 | 30.56 ± 0.41 | 0.036 |
| Feed intake, g/d/hen | 89.61 ± 0.23 | 90.13 ± 0.20 | 0.090 |
| FCR, g feed/g egg | 3.10 ± 0.04 | 3.02 ± 0.05 | 0.205 |
| 34–42 weeks of age | |||
| Egg production, % | 67.92 ± 0.60 | 70.03 ± 0.64 | 0.016 |
| Egg mass, g/d/hen | 30.49 ± 0.26 | 31.43 ± 0.29 | 0.018 |
| Feed intake, g/d/hen | 90.11 ± 0.18 | 90.39 ± 0.15 | 0.422 |
| FCR, g feed/g egg | 3.01 ± 0.03 | 2.94 ± 0.03 | 0.104 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. FCR, the ratio of feed intake to egg mass.
Effects of FPP on the egg quality of laying hens.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Egg weight, kg | 46.39 ± 0.55 | 47.46 ± 0.38 | 0.118 |
| Egg shape index | 1.35 ± 0.00 | 1.34 ± 0.01 | 0.160 |
| Eggshell thickness, mm | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.135 |
| Eggshell strength, kg/cm2 | 4.62 ± 0.09 | 4.69 ± 0.08 | 0.553 |
| Albumen height | 5.25 ± 0.08 | 5.56 ± 0.08 | 0.009 |
| Haugh unit | 78.56 ± 0.49 | 80.95 ± 1.06 | 0.045 |
| Yolk color | 8.87 ± 0.06 | 8.76 ± 0.08 | 0.269 |
| Yolk index | 33.24 ± 0.30 | 33.13 ± 0.23 | 0.772 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 1Effect of the fermented plant product (FPP) on jejunal histology and histomorphometry of laying hens. (A) Histomorphology of jejunal of laying hens from the CON and FPP treatments. Hematoxylin and erosion (H&E) staining. Scale bar, 200 μm. CON, basal diet without additive; FPP, basal diet + 500 mg/kg of FPP. (B) Villus height (VH), crypt depth (CD), and VH/CD ratio in the jejunum of laying hens-fed basal diet with 0 and 500 mg/kg FPP. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 2Relative abundance of tight junction proteins Occludin, ZO-1, and Claudin-1 mRNA in the jejunum of laying hens-fed basal diet supplemented with 0 (CON) and 500 mg/kg of the fermented plant product (FPP). β-actin was selected as an internal control. Data are shown as means and standard error (n = 8). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 3Effect of fermented plant product on the bacterial community diversity of cecal microbiota in laying hens. (A) Alpha diversity of cecal bacteria in laying hens-fed basal diet supplemented with 0 (CON) and 500 mg/kg fermented plant product (FPP). Box plots indicate microbiome diversity differences of Chao1 diversity, observed species, Shannon diversity, and Simpson diversity in CON and FPP groups. (B) Beta diversity analysis of cecal microbiota in the CON and FPP groups. PCoA and NMDS based on Bray–Curtis distance were applied to identify the separation of the samples. Red and blue dots represent samples collected from laying hens in the CON group and the FPP group, respectively.
Figure 4Changes in the cecal microbial community in response to the addition of fermented plant product. Community taxonomic composition and relative abundance of cecal microbiota in individual birds from CON (C1–C7) and FPP (F1–F7) groups at phylum (A) and genus (C) levels. Ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in each group based on their relative abundance (B). Heatmap of bacterial communities in the CON (C1–C7) and FPP (F1–F7) samples based on the top 35 dominant genera. Rows and columns represent the samples and dominant genera, respectively (D). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) (LDA>2.0, P < 0.05) of cecal microbiomes (E). Histogram of LDA value distribution indicating significant bacterial differences between the CON group (green) and FPP group (red). The prefixes “c_,” “o_,” “f_,” and “g_” represent the annotated level of class, order, family, and genus. CON, basal control diet without additive; FPP, basal diet + 500 mg/kg ferment plant product.
Figure 5Spearman's correlation analysis among the mRNA expression levels of intestinal barrier-related genes and relative abundances of cecal bacteria selected from the top 35 genera. *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. The depth of colors ranging from red-purple to navy-blue represents the magnitude of correlation. Significant correlations are marked by *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.