| Literature DB >> 36246102 |
Mojgan Ghodrati-Misek1, Thomas Schlöglhofer1,2,3, Christoph Gross2,3, Alexander Maurer1,2, Daniel Zimpfer3, Dietrich Beitzke4, Francesco Zonta5, Francesco Moscato1,2, Heinrich Schima1,2,3, Philipp Aigner1,2.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients and has been identified as a risk factor for thromboembolic stroke. Blood stagnation within the left atrial appendage (LAA) is considered a possible major source of thrombosis and clinical studies have shown reduced thromboembolic risk after LAA occlusion (LAAO). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of LAAO on thrombosis-related parameters using patient-specific simulations. Left ventricular and left atrial geometries of an LVAD patient were obtained from computed tomography and combined with hemodynamic data with either sinus rhythm (SR) or AF generated by a lumped parameter model. In four simulations applying contractile walls, stagnation volume and blood residence times were evaluated with or without AF and with or without LAAO. Reduced atrial contraction in AF resulted in unfavorable flow dynamics within the left atrium. The average atrial velocity was lower for the AF simulation when compared to SR, resulting in a 55% increase in the atrial stagnation volume (from 4.2 to 6.5 cm3). Moreover, blood remained in the LAA for more than 8 cardiac cycles. After LAAO the atrial stagnation decreased from 4.2 to 1.4 cm3 for SR and from 6.5 to 2.3 cm3 for the AF simulation. A significant stagnation volume was found in the LAA for both SR and AF, with larger values occurring with AF. These regions are known as potential sources for thrombus formation and can be diminished by LAAO. This significantly improved the thrombus-related flow parameters and may also lower the risk of thromboembolic events from the appendage.Entities:
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; computational fluid dynamics; left atrial appendage occlusion; sinus rhythm; thromboembolic risk; ventricular assist device
Year: 2022 PMID: 36246102 PMCID: PMC9557157 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1010862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
FIGURE 1Left heart model (encircled dashed ellipse marks LAAO) and CFD boundary conditions; PV: pulmonary vein, LA: left atrium, LV: left ventricle, MV: mitral valve, LAA: left atrial appendage, SR: sinus rhythm, AF: atrial fibrillation, LVAD: left ventricular assist device, IC: inflow cannula.
FIGURE 2The volume and flow curves comparison between the lumped-parameter model (LPM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models for simulations with sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF).
FIGURE 3Phasic average flow fields at Ewave (A), Diastasis (B), Awave (C) and Mid-systole (D) in a coronal plane for SR-LAA, SR-LAAO, AF-LAA and AF-LAAO.
FIGURE 4(A,B) Time-averaged wall shear stress distribution at the atrial and ventricular wall (A,B), time-averaged stagnation volume within the atrium and ventricle (C,D).
FIGURE 5Percentage of old blood remaining within the atrium (A), a close-up for last 5 cycles (B) and ventricle (C) over 8 cardiac cycles.
FIGURE 6Volume of the old blood remaining in the LAA after 8 cardiac cycles.