| Literature DB >> 36245727 |
Sigrid Kerrn-Jespersen1,2, Mads Andersen1,2, Kristine Bennedsgaard1,2, Ted Carl Kejlberg Andelius1,2, Michael Pedersen3, Kasper Jacobsen Kyng1,2, Tine Brink Henriksen1,2.
Abstract
Background: We have previously investigated neurological outcomes following remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC) in a newborn piglet model of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The aim of this study was to further investigate potential mechanisms of neuroprotection by comparing newborn piglets subjected to global hypoxia-ischemia (HI) treated with and without RIPC with regards to measures of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and methods: A total of 50 piglets were subjected to 45 min global HI and randomized to either no treatment or RIPC treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 72 h after the HI insult with perfusion-weighted (arterial spin labeling, ASL) and oxygenation-weighted (blood-oxygen-level-dependent, BOLD) sequences in the whole brain, basal ganglia, thalamus, and cortex. Four sham animals received anesthesia and mechanical ventilation only.Entities:
Keywords: arterial spin labeling; blood-oxygen-level-dependent; hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; magnetic resonance imaging; remote ischemic postconditioning
Year: 2022 PMID: 36245727 PMCID: PMC9559709 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.933962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
FIGURE 1Flowchart of sham animals and animals exposed to hypoxia-ischemia (HI) randomized to no treatment (HI group) or remote ischemic postconditioning (HI + RIPC group) undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Descriptive data of sham animals and animals exposed to hypoxia-ischemia randomized to no treatment (HI group) or remote ischemic postconditioning (HI + RIPC group) surviving until 72 h.
| Shams ( | HI ( | HI + RIPC ( | ||
|
| ||||
| Weight, g | 1,913 (452) | 1,519 (301) | 1,676 (255) | 0.15 |
| Age, h | 19 (1.1) | 20 (1.7) | 22 (2.0) | 0.06 |
| Females | 2 (50%) | 6 (46%) | 7 (47%) | 0.98 |
|
| ||||
| Heart rate, bpm | 151 (9.9) | 151 (22.4) | 141 (13.7) | 0.18 |
| Mean arterial BP, mmHg | No data | 52 (5.7) | 49 (5.0) | 0.26 |
| Arterial pCO2, kPa | 4.8 (0.5) | 5.1 (0.6) | 5.0 (0.8) | 0.87 |
| pH | 7.5 (0.07) | 7.5 (0.04) | 7.5 (0.08) | 0.72 |
| Standard base excess, mM | 6.8 (3.0) | 8.3 (1.8) | 7.1 (2.2) | 0.11 |
| Glucose, mM | 5.6 (4.7–6.0) | 5.5 (4.3–6.8) | 6.3 (5.7–7.5) | 0.23 |
| Lactate, mM | 1.6 (1.3–1.8) | 1.8 (1.5–2.0) | 1.8 (1.4–2.5) | 0.68 |
|
| ||||
| aEEG < 7 μV, min | 41 (37–42) | 41 (31–43) | 0.91 | |
| MAPB < 70% of baseline, min | 11.8 (7.8) | 4.1 (6.8) |
| |
|
| ||||
| Heart rate, bpm | 191 (35.4) | 194 (38.3) | 0.85 | |
| Mean arterial BP, mmHg | 52 (19.5) | 59 (18.4) | 0.40 | |
| Arterial pCO2, kPa | 5.7 (5.5–6.6) | 6.1 (5.5–7.4) | 0.50 | |
| pH | 7.0 (0.18) | 7.0 (0.17) | 0.68 | |
| Standard base excess, mM | –16.4 (6.0) | –16.5 (6.3) | 0.98 | |
| Glucose, mM | 10.2 (4.0) | 13.9 (4.7) |
| |
| Lactate, mM | 16.6 (3.4) | 16.0 (4.7) | 0.72 | |
|
| ||||
| Heart rate, bpm | 165 (19.2) | 171 (16.2) | 0.41 | |
| Mean arterial BP, mmHg | 47.5 (5.9) | 49.1 (6.6) | 0.53 | |
| Arterial pCO2, kPa | 4.7 (0.4) | 4.6 (0.5) | 0.66 | |
| pH | 7.5 (0.04) | 7.5 (0.07) | 0.54 | |
| Standard base excess, mM | 5.5 (3.7–7.0) | 3.2 (1.9–5.9) | 0.19 | |
| Glucose, mM | 5.9 (5.3–7.4) | 8.3 (6.5–11.0) |
| |
| Lactate, mM | 2.3 (1.7–3.2) | 3.5 (2.2–5.0) | 0.07 | |
|
| ||||
| Heart rate, bpm | 157 (7.9) | 136 (20.1) | 145 (21.0) | 0.24 |
| Temperature, °C | 38.7 (0.1) | 38.4 (0.6) | 38.2 (0.5) | 0.47 |
| Arterial pCO2, kPa | 4.9 (4.5–5.4) | 5.9 (5.4–6.3) | 5.4 (5.1–6.8) | 0.58 |
| pH | 7.5 (0.08) | 7.4 (0.09) | 7.4 (0.11) | 0.18 |
| Standard base excess, mM | 6.3 (2.6) | 1.4 (3.9) | 1.3 (4.1) | 0.95 |
| Glucose, mM | 5.6 (5.5–5.6) | 5.6 (5.0–6.1) | 5.6 (5.3–5.9) | 0.92 |
| Lactate, mM | 1.2 (0.2) | 3.8 (1.2) | 2.3 (1.1) |
|
We compared the HI and HI + RIPC group. Normally distributed data were analysed by Student’s t-tests and presented as means (standard deviation), while non-normally distributed data were analysed by Mann-Whitney tests and presented as medians (interquartile range). Categorial data were analysed by chi-square tests and presented as n (%). Bold values indicate statistically significant difference.
FIGURE 2Cerebral blood flow in sham animals and animals subjected to hypoxia-ischemia randomized to no treatment (HI group) or remote ischemic postconditioning (HI + RIPC group) at 72 h. Cerebral blood flow assessed by arterial spin labeling functional magnetic resonance imaging. Data were analysed by Student’s t-test and presented with mean values and standard deviations. P-values are denoted by: *(<0.05); **(<0.01); ***(<0.001).
FIGURE 3Blood-oxygen-level-dependent imaging in sham animals and animals subjected to hypoxia-ischemia randomized to no treatment (HI group) or remote ischemic postconditioning (HI + RIPC group) at 72 h. T2* signals assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Data were analysed by Student’s t-test and presented with mean values and standard deviations. P-values are denoted by: *(<0.05).