| Literature DB >> 36245696 |
Aya S Eweys1,2, Yan-Sheng Zhao2, Osama M Darwesh3.
Abstract
This study designed to investigate effect of fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum on antioxidant and anticancer properties of Cinnamomum cassia aqueous solution. The optimum condition to produce high antioxidant activity was 107 CFU L. plantarum/10 g cinnamon at pH6 after 3 days of incubation at 35 °C. Fermented cinnamon showed an increase in ABTS, DPPH and H2O2 by 24.63, 58.31 and 60.27%, respectively over the control. Also, the total phenolic and flavonoid contents were increased, 8.15 to 11.40 mg GAE/g and 0.43 to 2.61 mg QE/g, respectively. The gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, catechin and chlorogenic acid were increased by 37, 404, 11 and 98%, respectively. Also, anticancer activity was developed after fermentation. The increased antioxidant activity of fermented cinnamon could be attributed to the increase of some phenolics and flavonoids. Hence, cinnamon fermentation using L. plantarum is able to enhance its antioxidant and anticancer activities without producing toxic substances.Entities:
Keywords: Anticancer; Antioxidant; Cinnamomum cassia; Fermentation technology; Lactobacillus plantarum
Year: 2022 PMID: 36245696 PMCID: PMC9562600 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2022.e00768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Effect of different L. plantarum inoculum densities (as CFU) used for cinnamon fermentation on its antioxidant activity.
| CFU/10 g cinnamon | ABTS radical scavenging activity% | DPPH radical scavenging activity% | Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 29.49bc | 64.86ab | 60.40ab |
| 102 | 24.80cd | 40.97d | 30.51cd |
| 103 | 31.52abc | 55.72c | 39.19c |
| 105 | 32.80ab | 60.35bc | 44.04bc |
| 107 | 37.39a | 70.01a | 67.47a |
| 109 | 20.32d | 58.54bc | 20.81d |
Where the data are the means of triplicate experiments,a, b, c, dvalues in the same column with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). a value is the highest antioxidant activity and d value is the lowest antioxidant activity in the same column.
Fig. 1The scavenging activity (%) of cinnamon during different fermentation periods by L. plantarum. Where the data are the average of triplicate treatments.
The effect of initial pH on the scavenging ability of cinnamon.
| pH value | ABTS radical scavenging activity% | DPPH radical scavenging activity% | Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 38.26a | 68.55ab | 37.98bc |
| 5 | 42.70a | 71.20ab | 49.49ab |
| 6 | 45.32a | 77.06a | 55.35a |
| 7 | 40.67a | 76.38a | 36.57bc |
| 8 | 39.61a | 62.30b | 32.12c |
Where the data are the means of triplicate experiments a,b,c values in the same column with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). a value is the highest antioxidant activity and c value is the lowest antioxidant activity in the same column.
Antioxidant activity, total phenols and flavonoids contents of lyophilized fermented and non-fermented cinnamon.
| Antioxidant analysis | Non-fermented cinnamon | Fermented cinnamon |
|---|---|---|
| ABTS radical scavenging activity% | 24.20 | 30.16 |
| DPPH radical scavenging activity% | 42.72 | 67.63 |
| Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity% | 21.52 | 34.31 |
| Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g lyophilized extract) | 8.15 | 11.40 |
| Total flavonoids content (mg QE/g lyophilized extract) | 0.43 | 2.61 |
Where the data are the means of triplicate experiments; Samples in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
value is the highest antioxidant activity and.
value is the lowest antioxidant activity in the same row.
Fig. 2Flowchart of increasing antioxidant activity of cinnamon by fermentation processes.
Inhibition zone diameters of the lyophilized extracts of fermented and non-fermented cinnamon against different pathogenic microorganisms.
| Pathogens | Inhibition zone of fermented cinnamon (mm) | Inhibition zone of non-fermented cinnamon (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | 26 | |
| 29 | 38 | |
| L. | 24 | 26 |
| 23 | 23 | |
| 20 | 21 |
The data are the means of triplicate experiments, Where; LB, fermented sample by L. plantarum, C, non-fermented sample; E.C, E. coli; Salm, S. typhi; List, L. monocytogenes; St, S. aureus and C. alb., C. albicans.
Fig. 3Comparison between the inhibition zones of the lyophilized extracts of fermented and non-fermented cinnamon against different pathogenic microorganisms.
Fig. 4Percentage of Normal and Cancer cell viability after treating with fermented and non-fermented cinnamon extracts. Where the data are the average of triplicate treatments.
Fig. 5TLC chromatogram of lyophilized fermented and non-fermented cinnamon extracts.
Differentiation between some bioactive compounds in L. plantarum fermented and non-fermented cinnamon extracts.
| Compound | Retention time (min) | L. | Non-fermented cinnamon (μg/g) | Conversion hypothesis | Activity of produced or increased compound | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid | 4.183 | 309.90 | 225.48 | Hydrolysis of tannic acid to form gallic acid | Antioxidant | [ |
| Protocatechuic acid | 6.753 | 221.31 | 520.47 | It may be esterified | Protocatechuic esters has antioxidant activity higher than protocatechuic acid | |
| 9.937 | 73.89 | 14.65 | Hydrolysis of benzoic acid to form | Promotion the expression of antioxidant enzymes | ||
| Catechin | 11.738 | 32.75 | 29.40 | Conversion of epicatechin to form catechin | Antioxidant | [ |
| Chlorogenic acid | 12.872 | 17.46 | 8.80 | Quinic acid and caffeic acid formed chlorogenic acid | Antioxidant | [ |
Fig. 6Chromatogram of standards (a), non-fermented (b) and L. plantarum fermented cinnamon extract (c).