| Literature DB >> 36245641 |
G Újvári1,2,3, U Klötzli3, T Stevens4, A Svensson5, P Ludwig6, T Vennemann7, S Gier8, M Horschinegg3, L Palcsu9, D Hippler10, J Kovács11,12, C Di Biagio13, P Formenti13.
Abstract
Abrupt and large-scale climate changes have occurred repeatedly and within decades during the last glaciation. These events, where dramatic warming occurs over decades, are well represented in both Greenland ice core mineral dust and temperature records, suggesting a causal link. However, the feedbacks between atmospheric dust and climate change during these Dansgaard-Oeschger events are poorly known and the processes driving changes in atmospheric dust emission and transport remain elusive. Constraining dust provenance is key to resolving these gaps. Here, we present a multi-technique analysis of Greenland dust provenance using novel and established, source diagnostic isotopic tracers as well as results from a regional climate model including dust cycle simulations. We show that the existing dominant model for the provenance of Greenland dust as sourced from combined East Asian dust and Pacific volcanics is not supported. Rather, our clay mineralogical and Hf-Sr-Nd and D/H isotopic analyses from last glacial Greenland dust and an extensive range of Northern Hemisphere potential dust sources reveal three most likely scenarios (in order of probability): direct dust sourcing from the Taklimakan Desert in western China, direct sourcing from European glacial sources, or a mix of dust originating from Europe and North Africa. Furthermore, our regional climate modeling demonstrates the plausibility of European or mixed European/North African sources for the first time. We suggest that the origin of dust to Greenland is potentially more complex than previously recognized, demonstrating more uncertainty in our understanding dust climate feedbacks during abrupt events than previously understood.Entities:
Keywords: Greenland; NGRIP ice core; aerosol; isotopic fingerprinting; mineral dust
Year: 2022 PMID: 36245641 PMCID: PMC9542552 DOI: 10.1029/2022JD036597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos ISSN: 2169-897X Impact factor: 5.217
Figure 1Locations of the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP) and other central Greenland ice cores and potential source area samples across the Northern Hemisphere. Sites displayed on map are as follows (codes also listed in Dataset S1 and S2). Greenland: NGRIP – North Greenland Ice Core Project ice core, GRIP ‐ Greenland Ice Core Project ice core, GISP2 – Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 ice core, NEEM ‐ North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling. North America: SiC – Silver Creek (Yukon, Canada), Obe – Obert (Nebraska, USA), Pra – Prairie Lake (Nebraska, USA), Wan – Wauneta (Nebraska, USA). European sites are abbreviated, where necessary (with original codes given in parenthesis, and in Dataset S2): B – Basaharc (Bh, Hungary), Bk – Bialy Kosciol (Poland), C – Crvenka (Crv, Serbia), D – Dunaszekcső (Dsz, Hungary), KW – Krems‐Wachtberg (KW‐GH9, Austria), LMJ – La Motte (Jersey, Channel Islands), M – Mende (Me, Hungary), Nus – Nussloch (Germany), P – Paks (Pa, Hungary), PbE – Pegwell Bay (UK), RG – Raigorod (Lower Volga, Russia), T – Titel core (Tic‐1A, Serbia), Url – Urluia (Romania), Z – Zmajevac (Zm, Croatia). North Africa: Mao – Maouna (Tunisia), MoLC – off‐road site (Erg Chebbi, Morocco), S107 – off‐road site (Ahaggar Mts., Algeria). Central Asia: Cha – Chasmanigar (Tajikistan), Rem – Remizovka (Kazakhstan). Northeast Asia: KHG – Khangar volcano (Kamchatka, Russia), KO – Kurile lake (Kamchatka, Russia), Sib – Tumara valley (Siberia, Russia). Southeast Asia: BD – road site (Badain Jaran desert, China) Bei – Beiguoyuan (Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP), China), Fan – Fanshan (around Beijing, China), Jb54 – dune site (Junggar basin, China), Lin – Lingtai (CLP, China), Luo – Luochuan (CLP, China), OD – road site (Otin Dag desert, China), TD/TD2 – road sites (Tengger desert, China), Td06/Td25/Td34 – overbank, stream (fan) and loess sites (Taklimakan desert, China). Regional color coding corresponds with those in Figures 2, 3, 4.
Figure 2Ternary clay mineralogy diagrams of Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 (GISP2)/Greenland Ice Core Project (GRIP) ice core dust and potential source areas in the (a) illite‐smectite‐kaolinite, (b) illite‐kaolinite‐chlorite and (c) chlorite/kaolinite‐kaolinite/illite‐smectite/kaolinite space. Note that the XRD data are normalized to 100 percent in each ternary plot. Dots without rims and fields in the background indicate published literature data (<2 μm fractions), while dots with rims denote newly acquired XRD data obtained in this study. Geographic regions represented by only one datum (e.g., NE Asia) is not defined by fields, but a rimless dot. Error bars on panels a) and b) represent a general 10 wt% uncertainty of XRD determination.
Figure 3Sr‐Nd (a) and Nd‐Hf (c) isotope compositions of central Greenland last glacial dust and potential source area samples with mixture models in the Sr‐Nd (b) and Nd‐Hf (d) isotope space. Fields and rimless dots indicate literature data (list of data sources in Dataset S2), while dots with rims denote new isotopic data obtained in this study. End‐members displayed on panels (b and d) are loess from Luochuan (Luo, CLP, China) and pumice fall deposit of the Khangar volcano (KHG, Kamchatka, Russia). Mixing lines are calculated with the equations given in Faure and Mensing (2005) and using elemental concentrations of Luo and KHG determined by ICP‐MS and shown in Dataset S2. Measured Sr‐Nd‐Hf isotope compositions of artificial mixtures of KHG and Luo (proportions of 10%–90% and 30%–70%) are displayed in panel (b and d).
Figure 4Box/scatter‐(a) and bi‐plots (b–c) of hydrogen isotope compositions of the clay structural water (δD csw) of North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP) last glacial dust and potential source area (PSA) samples as a function of Nd‐Hf isotope compositions. The NGRIP mean δD csw value is −71‰ with a ±9‰ band derived from the repeatability of 2–5 μm separates of PSA samples (see Text S4 and Figure S6 in Supporting Information S1). The δD csw of both 2 and 5 μm separates are included in boxes of panel (a) and can be found in Dataset S2. In panel (b–c) all hydrogen isotope data are displayed as measured on both 2 and 5 μm separates, where corresponding Nd and Hf isotope ratios were available from the 5 μm fractions (Dataset S2).
Figure 5(a) Total simulated dust deposition (g m−2) over Greenland accumulated over 30 model years. (b) Trajectories (black lines), total dust load (shading, mg m−2) and geopotential height (gpdm) at 700 hPa during an individual dust event in July. (c) Density of emission source points found from backward trajectories based on TOP20 dust deposition events over Greenland when they reach an emission area for the first time (trajectory points per 1°), based on 1,023 trajectory points in total. (d) Trajectory density (percentage of trajectory points per 2° radius) for all TOP20 dust deposition events, based on 24,404 trajectory points in total. Emission areas hatched. Numbering in panels (b–d): 1. Basaharc (Bh, Hungary), 2. Crvenka (Crv, Serbia), 3. Dunaszekcső (Dsz, Hungary), 4. Mende (Me, Hungary), 5. Paks (Pa, Hungary), 6. Titel core site (Tic, Serbia), 7. Urluia (Url, Romania), 8. Zmajevac (Zm, Croatia), 9. La Motte (LMJ, Green Island, Jersey, Channel Islands), 10. Krems‐Wachtberg (KW, Austria), 11. Nussloch (Nus, Germany), 12. Bialy Kosciol (Bk, Poland), 13. Pegwell Bay site (PbE, UK). Red line depicts Last Glacial Maximum land mask based on Paleomodel Intercomparison Project3 guidelines for the 21k experiment.
Figure 6Backward trajectories for the TOP20 deposition events and dust emission areas. Event number and month indicated at the bottom left for each case. Shaded: Mean dust emission [μg m−2 s−1] between the first and last time a trajectory passed over a region with dust emission for each event.