Literature DB >> 36245530

Peking prognostic score is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases receiving hepatectomy.

Jianping Xiong1, Yunzi Wu1, Haitao Hu1, Wenzhe Kang1, Yang Li1, Peng Jin1, Xinxin Shao1, Weikun Li1, Yibin Xie1, Yantao Tian1.   

Abstract

Background: The present work evaluated how Peking prognostic score (PPS), the new prognostic index determined according to sarcopenia and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), was a prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) who received hepatectomy.
Methods: This work extracted information about patients with GCLM who underwent hepatectomy from June 2012 to May 2018. The PPS of the patients was calculated from sarcopenia status and LCR before surgery, and patients were then divided into three groups based on their PPS. This work also carried out univariate and multivariate analyses for identifying variables that were linked with overall survival (OS) together with recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy among three groups according to PPS.
Results: This work included 108 GCLM cases who received hepatectomy. All cases were classified into 3 groups, i.e., 26 (24.1%), 48 (44.4%), and 34 (31.5%) in groups 0-2, separately. PPS exhibited positive relation with age (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI; p = 0.012), and liver metastasis number. The relapse rate after hepatectomy in patients with GCLM was 69.4%. Additionally, the remnant liver relapse rates of groups 0-2 were 80.0, 68.7, and 53.5%. Patients in group 0 had significantly increased remnant liver relapse rates when compared with those in groups 0 and 1. PPS was significantly related to relapse patterns (p = 0.003). Relative to group 0, those of the other 2 groups showed dismal OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.98, 7.49 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001] along with RFS (HR = 3.65, 5.33 for groups 1 and 2; p < 0.001). As revealed by multivariate analysis, PPS independently predicted OS (p < 0.001) together with RFS (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The PPS could be an easy nutrition-inflammation prognostic scoring system and an independent preoperative predictor of survival for GCLM cases after hepatectomy.
Copyright © 2022 Xiong, Wu, Hu, Kang, Li, Jin, Shao, Li, Xie and Tian.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peking prognostic score; gastric cancer; hepatectomy; liver metastases; prognostic scoring system

Year:  2022        PMID: 36245530      PMCID: PMC9562039          DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.976364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Nutr        ISSN: 2296-861X


  31 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes after surgical resection for gastric cancer liver metastasis: an analysis of 64 macroscopically complete resections.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Takemura; Akio Saiura; Rintaro Koga; Junichi Arita; Ryuji Yoshioka; Yoshihiro Ono; Naoki Hiki; Takeshi Sano; Junji Yamamoto; Norihiro Kokudo; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Multicentre analysis of long-term outcome after surgical resection for gastric cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  T Kinoshita; T Kinoshita; A Saiura; M Esaki; H Sakamoto; T Yamanaka
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Peking Prognostic Score, Based on Preoperative Sarcopenia Status, Is a Novel Prognostic Factor in Patients With Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jianping Xiong; Haitao Hu; Wenzhe Kang; Yang Li; Peng Jin; Xinxin Shao; Weikun Li; Yantao Tian
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-06

4.  Survival benefit of combined curative resection of the stomach (D2 resection) and liver in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases.

Authors:  S H Cheon; S Y Rha; H-C Jeung; C-K Im; S H Kim; H R Kim; J B Ahn; J K Roh; S H Noh; H C Chung
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Long-term survival after liver metastasectomy in gastric cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Francesco Montagnani; Francesca Crivelli; Giuseppe Aprile; Caterina Vivaldi; Irene Pecora; Rocco De Vivo; Mario Alberto Clerico; Lorenzo Fornaro
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Sarcopenia and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score predict postsurgical outcomes in localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michelle I Higgins; Dylan J Martini; Dattatraya H Patil; Reza Nabavizadeh; Sean Steele; Milton Williams; Shreyas S Joshi; Vikram M Narayan; Aarti Sekhar; Sarah P Psutka; Kenneth Ogan; Mehmet Asim Bilen; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Chinese consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastases.

Authors:  Kecheng Zhang; Lin Chen
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 8.168

8.  The prognostic value of sarcopenia combined with preoperative fibrinogen-albumin ratio in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after surgery: A multicenter, prospective study.

Authors:  Haitao Yu; Mingxun Wang; Yi Wang; Jinhuan Yang; Liming Deng; Wenming Bao; Bangjie He; Zixia Lin; Ziyan Chen; Kaiyu Chen; Baofu Zhang; Fangting Liu; Zhengping Yu; Longyun Ye; Bin Jin; Gang Chen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Sarcopenia is an Independent Predictor of Severe Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Survival After Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Analysis from a Large-Scale Cohort.

Authors:  Cheng-Le Zhuang; Dong-Dong Huang; Wen-Yang Pang; Chong-Jun Zhou; Su-Lin Wang; Neng Lou; Liang-Liang Ma; Zhen Yu; Xian Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.