Literature DB >> 36245219

Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on patient-reported outcome measures in Dutch hip and knee arthroplasty patients.

Joshua M Bonsel1, Lichelle Groot2, Abigael Cohen3, Jan A N Verhaar3, Maaike G J Gademan4, Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren5, Gouke J Bonsel6, Max Reijman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: During the first COVID-19 lockdown elective surgery was greatly reduced. Prioritization of patients with greater need and expected benefit in terms of quality of life was advised. The lockdown also potentially affected follow-up outcomes. Therefore, our study compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) retrieved during the lockdown of Dutch primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) patients with previous years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed cross-sectional analyses using national data from the Dutch Orthopaedic Registry (LROI). All primary elective THA and TKA patients with preoperative or postoperative PROMs (EQ-5D-3L index, OHS/OKS) during the first COVID-19 lockdown between March and July 15, 2020 were included. Patients with PROMs during the same months in 2018 plus 2019 were used as control. Finally, 33,453 THA and 27,335 TKA patients were included. Patient characteristics were compared during versus before the lockdown. Subsequently, the lockdown effect on PROMs scores was analyzed with multivariable linear regression.
RESULTS: During the COVID-19 lockdown, THA and TKA patients had a lower age and BMI preoperatively, and more often had surgery in private clinics. Both preoperative PROMs in THA patients, but not in TKA patients, were worse (EQ-5D: Adjusted mean difference (AMD) -0.021, p < 0.001) during the lockdown compared with prior years. Both postoperative PROMs in THA and TKA patients were better during the lockdown (12-month EQ-5D in THA: AMD 0.010, p = 0.003; and in TKA: AMD 0.013, p < 0.001).
INTERPRETATION: During the COVID-19 lockdown, THA patients had slightly worse preoperative PROMs, suggesting selection of patients with greater urgency. Postoperative PROMs in both THA and TKA patients differed minimally. Overall, the observed differences were likely not clinically relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36245219      PMCID: PMC9574562          DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.925


  29 in total

Review 1.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Response-Scale Heterogeneity in the EQ-5D.

Authors:  Rachel J Knott; Nicole Black; Bruce Hollingsworth; Paula K Lorgelly
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Comparing individual- and area-based socioeconomic measures for the surveillance of health disparities: A multilevel analysis of Massachusetts births, 1989-1991.

Authors:  S V Subramanian; J T Chen; D H Rehkopf; P D Waterman; N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sebrina Hansen; Jens Aaboe; Inger Mechlenburg; Søren Overgaard; Lone Ramer Mikkelsen
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Development of Preoperative Prediction Models for Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using The Dutch Arthroplasty Register Data.

Authors:  Jaap J Tolk; J Erwin H Waarsing; Rob P A Janssen; Liza N van Steenbergen; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Max Reijman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Elective Orthopaedic Surgery During COVID-19: A Safe Way to Get Back on Track.

Authors:  Claudio Zorzi; Gianluca Piovan; Daniele Screpis; Simone Natali; Stefania Marocco; Venanzio Iacono
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-11-17

7.  A US Population Health Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 Using the EQ-5D-5L.

Authors:  Joel W Hay; Cynthia L Gong; Xiayu Jiao; Nadine K Zawadzki; Roy S Zawadzki; A Simon Pickard; Feng Xie; Samuel A Crawford; Ning Yan Gu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  What Is the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Quality of Life and Other Patient-reported Outcomes? An Analysis of the Hand-Wrist Study Cohort.

Authors:  Abigael Cohen; Ruud W Selles; Willemijn A De Ridder; Marloes H P Ter Stege; J Sebastiaan Souer; Robbert M Wouters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.