Chun Li1, Ming Liu1, Weixiang Chen1, Tingbo Jiang1, Lin Ling2. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China. joylinling@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on platelet function, cardiovascular prognosis, and bleeding in patients with unstable angina pectoris. METHODS: Patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled (January 2018-December 2019). In total, 212 patients were treated with ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) and 210 patients were treated with clopidogrel (75 mg once daily). Thromboelastography and light transmission aggregometry were used to measure the platelet aggregation rate (PAR). High-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (h-FABP) were measured to assess myocardial injury after PCI. Cardiovascular prognosis and bleeding events were evaluated in hospital and 12 months after discharge. RESULTS: The PAR was significantly slower with ticagrelor (P < 0.001). hs-TnT, NT-proBNP, CRP, and h-FABP increased after compared with before PCI in both groups (P < 0.05). hs-TnT (P < 0.001) and h-FABP (P < 0.001) increased more significantly with clopidogrel. The in-hospital and 12-month major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rates were not significantly different between the two groups. The in-hospital total bleeding event rate was higher with ticagrelor (P < 0.05). Minor bleeding and total bleeding were more frequent at the 12-month follow-up in the ticagrelor group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor was more effective in suppressing the PAR than clopidogrel and reduced PCI-induced myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina pectoris. However, it increased in-hospital and 12-month bleeding events and had no benefit on in-hospital and 12-month MACEs.
PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on platelet function, cardiovascular prognosis, and bleeding in patients with unstable angina pectoris. METHODS: Patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled (January 2018-December 2019). In total, 212 patients were treated with ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) and 210 patients were treated with clopidogrel (75 mg once daily). Thromboelastography and light transmission aggregometry were used to measure the platelet aggregation rate (PAR). High-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (h-FABP) were measured to assess myocardial injury after PCI. Cardiovascular prognosis and bleeding events were evaluated in hospital and 12 months after discharge. RESULTS: The PAR was significantly slower with ticagrelor (P < 0.001). hs-TnT, NT-proBNP, CRP, and h-FABP increased after compared with before PCI in both groups (P < 0.05). hs-TnT (P < 0.001) and h-FABP (P < 0.001) increased more significantly with clopidogrel. The in-hospital and 12-month major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rates were not significantly different between the two groups. The in-hospital total bleeding event rate was higher with ticagrelor (P < 0.05). Minor bleeding and total bleeding were more frequent at the 12-month follow-up in the ticagrelor group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor was more effective in suppressing the PAR than clopidogrel and reduced PCI-induced myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina pectoris. However, it increased in-hospital and 12-month bleeding events and had no benefit on in-hospital and 12-month MACEs.