| Literature DB >> 36241758 |
Yaning Chen1, Weili Duan2, Yaqi Li3,4, Mengzhu Cao3,4, Jingxiu Qin3,4.
Abstract
Agricultural irrigation consumes most of the fresh water in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), directly affecting water resource management and allocation. Irrigation water demand is a key component of regional water resources management. We analyzed spatiotemporal variation in irrigation water requirement, irrigation demand index (IDI), and the proposed regional optimization of irrigation water use based on the Bayesian probability network. Results showed that: (1) The IDI in the study area increased slightly (trend slope = 0.028 a-1) as the effective precipitation increased by 63% during this period, and total irrigation water requirement (IR) decreased from 277.61 km3 in 2000 to 240 km3 in 2015. (2) Cotton had the highest crop IDI, followed by maize and wheat. (3) According to the comprehensive scenario analysis, improving the crop planting structure (by moderately increasing the planting proportion of maize in the CPEC) is conducive to improving regional water and food security by enhancing the grain yield (+ 9%), reducing the malnourished proportion of the population (low state + 7.2%), and bolstering water-saving irrigation technologies in Pakistan as well as water conveyance systems in Pakistan. Our results form an important baseline in determining the way forward on sustainable water resource utilization management in the CPEC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36241758 PMCID: PMC9568503 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21685-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Annual average net irrigation water requirement (IRnet) (a–c) and spatial distribution, trend and significance (d–f) for wheat, maize, and cotton in irrigated areas of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) from 2000 to 2015.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of the average annual IDI of wheat (a), maize (b) and cotton (c) in the irrigated region of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) from 2000 to 2015.
Responses of the target variables to the scenario variables under different scenarios.
| Target node | Nodes for scenario setting | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | FL | FH | WL | WH | IW | LCL | LCH | LF | LW | LM | LR | LSH | LSL | |
| Major cash crops acreage (high) | + 1.2 | + 0.2 | ||||||||||||
| Output of major grain crops(high) | + 0.2 | + 2.5 | + 5.6 | + 0.1 | + 5.5 | + 5.7 | + 9 | + 4.4 | − 0.2 | − 0.1 | ||||
| Major grain crops acreage (high) | + 1.7 | |||||||||||||
| Output of major cash crops(high) | + 2.8 | + 8.7 | − 1.3 | + 1.6 | + 10.7 | + 4.5 | ||||||||
| Undernourished population(low) | + 2.1 | − 0.2 | − 0.2 | − 0.4 | + 0.5 | + 7.2 | + 0.7 | − 0.1 | ||||||
| Undernourished population(high) | + 0.4 | + 0.2 | ||||||||||||
| Arable land(high) | + 17 | |||||||||||||
| GAP (high) | + 1.4 | − 0.2 | + 0.1 | + 2.6 | + 2.5 | + 3 | + 2.2 | + 0.3 | + 0.1 | |||||
| Agricultural water consumption(low) | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | ||||||||||||
| Proportion of population with safe drinking water(high) | − 4.9 | − 4.8 | + 0.3 | − 1.4 | + 0.3 | − 0.8 | − 0.8 | − 0.8 | − 0.8 | |||||
| Total IR (low) | + 0.4 | + 0.9 | − 1.4 | + 0.7 | − 0.2 | |||||||||
| Total IRnet of major cash crops(low) | − 5.6 | − 17 | − 9.6 | − 4.7 | ||||||||||
| Total IRnet of major cash crops(high) | + 8.1 | + 4.1 | ||||||||||||
| Total IRnet of major grain crops(high) | + 18.2 | + 10.5 | + 9 | + 10.3 | ||||||||||
| Total IRnet of major grain crops(low) | + 27 | − 0.2 | − 7.6 | − 6.2 | − 7.6 | |||||||||
| Groundwater usage(low) | + 8 | |||||||||||||
| Groundwater usage(low) | ||||||||||||||
| Applying quantity of chemical fertilizer(low) | + 0.3 | |||||||||||||
SA saline-alkali land area (low), FL quantity of chemical fertilizer (low), FH quantity of chemical fertilizer (high), WL number of tube wells (low), WH number of tube wells (high), IW total IR (low), LCL cotton acreage (low), LCH cotton acreage (high), LF major grain crop acreage (high), LW wheat acreage (high), LM maize acreage (high), LR rice acreage (high), LSH sugarcane acreage (high), LSL sugarcane acreage (low). The “high” and “low” indicate the highest or lowest level of each node after discretization, respectively. The values in the table show the change in the percentage probability values of the specific states of the response nodes on the left after the “high” or “low” states of the upper scenario variables are determined.
Figure 3Inter-annual variation trends of the effective precipitation (Pe) and the average net irrigation water requirement (IRnet) for three crops (maize, wheat, and cotton) in the irrigated areas of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) from 2000 to 2015.
Figure 4Spatial distribution (a), trend and significance (b) of the average annual effective precipitation (Pe) in irrigated areas of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) from 2000 to 2015.
Figure 5Map of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) study area (Drawing approval number: GS (2020) 4619).
Figure 6Research approach and technical route.
Figure 7Schematic diagram of the Bayesian network structure.