Linda C Chu1, Zhen J Wang2, Avinash Kambadakone3, Elizabeth M Hecht4, Jin He5, Amol K Narang6, Daniel A Laheru7, Hina Arif-Tiwari8, Priya Bhosale9, Candice W Bolan10, Olga R Brook11, Abraham F Bezuidenhout11, Richard K G Do12, Samuel J Galgano13, Ajit H Goenka14, Alexander R Guimaraes15, David M Hough14, Naveen Kulkarni16, Ott Le9, Lyndon Luk17, Lorenzo Mannelli18, Michael Rosenthal19, Guillermo Sangster20, Zarine K Shah21, Erik V Soloff22, Parag P Tolat16, Marc Zins23, Elliot K Fishman24, Eric P Tamm9, Atif Zaheer24. 1. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. lindachu@jhmi.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 7. Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 8. Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA. 9. Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 10. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 11. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 12. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 13. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA. 14. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 15. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 16. Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin & Froedtert Health, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 17. Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 18. Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) SDN, Naples, Italy. 19. Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 20. Department of Radiology, Ochsner Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA. 21. Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. 22. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 23. Department of Radiology, Hôpital Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France. 24. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgical resection is the only potential curative treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but unfortunately most patients recur within 5 years of surgery. This article aims to assess the practice patterns across major academic institutions and develop consensus recommendations for postoperative imaging and interpretation in patients with PDAC. METHODS: The consensus recommendations for postoperative imaging surveillance following PDAC resection were developed using the Delphi method. Members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) PDAC Disease Focused Panel (DFP) underwent three rounds of surveys followed by live webinar group discussions to develop consensus recommendations. RESULTS: Significant variations currently exist in the postoperative surveillance of PDAC, even among academic institutions. Differentiating common postoperative inflammatory and fibrotic changes from tumor recurrence remains a diagnostic challenge, and there is no reliable size threshold or growth rate of imaging findings that can provide differentiation. A new liver lesion or peritoneal nodule should be considered suspicious for tumor recurrence, and the imaging features should be interpreted in the appropriate clinical context (e.g., CA 19-9, clinical presentation, pathologic staging). CONCLUSION: Postoperative imaging following PDAC resection is challenging to interpret due to the presence of confounding postoperative inflammatory changes. A standardized reporting template for locoregional findings and report impression may improve communication of relaying risk of recurrence with referring providers, which merits validation in future studies.
PURPOSE: Surgical resection is the only potential curative treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but unfortunately most patients recur within 5 years of surgery. This article aims to assess the practice patterns across major academic institutions and develop consensus recommendations for postoperative imaging and interpretation in patients with PDAC. METHODS: The consensus recommendations for postoperative imaging surveillance following PDAC resection were developed using the Delphi method. Members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) PDAC Disease Focused Panel (DFP) underwent three rounds of surveys followed by live webinar group discussions to develop consensus recommendations. RESULTS: Significant variations currently exist in the postoperative surveillance of PDAC, even among academic institutions. Differentiating common postoperative inflammatory and fibrotic changes from tumor recurrence remains a diagnostic challenge, and there is no reliable size threshold or growth rate of imaging findings that can provide differentiation. A new liver lesion or peritoneal nodule should be considered suspicious for tumor recurrence, and the imaging features should be interpreted in the appropriate clinical context (e.g., CA 19-9, clinical presentation, pathologic staging). CONCLUSION: Postoperative imaging following PDAC resection is challenging to interpret due to the presence of confounding postoperative inflammatory changes. A standardized reporting template for locoregional findings and report impression may improve communication of relaying risk of recurrence with referring providers, which merits validation in future studies.
Authors: Robert P Jones; Eftychia-Eirini Psarelli; Richard Jackson; Paula Ghaneh; Christopher M Halloran; Daniel H Palmer; Fiona Campbell; Juan W Valle; Olusola Faluyi; Derek A O'Reilly; David Cunningham; Jonathan Wadsley; Suzanne Darby; Tim Meyer; Roopinder Gillmore; Alan Anthoney; Pehr Lind; Bengt Glimelius; Stephen Falk; Jakob R Izbicki; Gary William Middleton; Sebastian Cummins; Paul J Ross; Harpreet Wasan; Alec McDonald; Tom Crosby; Yuk Ting; Kinnari Patel; David Sherriff; Rubin Soomal; David Borg; Sharmila Sothi; Pascal Hammel; Markus M Lerch; Julia Mayerle; Christine Tjaden; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; John P Neoptolemos Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Vincent P Groot; Neda Rezaee; Wenchuan Wu; John L Cameron; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Matthew J Weiss; Lei Zheng; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Akhil Chawla; Motaz Qadan; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Jennifer Y Wo; Jill N Allen; Jeffrey W Clark; Janet E Murphy; Onofrio A Catalano; David P Ryan; David T Ting; Vikram Deshpande; Colin D Weekes; Aparna Parikh; Keith D Lillemoe; Theodore S Hong; Cristina R Ferrone Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Zhen J Wang; Hina Arif-Tiwari; Atif Zaheer; Sanaz Ameli; Priya R Bhosale; Richard K Do; Ajit H Goenka; Alexander R Guimares; Guillermo P Sangster; Erik V Soloff; Eric P Tamm; Marc Zins; Avinash R Kambadakone Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-09-16
Authors: Vincent P Groot; Georgios Gemenetzis; Alex B Blair; Roberto J Rivero-Soto; Jun Yu; Ammar A Javed; Richard A Burkhart; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; I Quintus Molenaar; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Mark J Truty; Michael L Kendrick; David M Nagorney; Rory L Smoot; Sean P Cleary; Rondell P Graham; Ajit H Goenka; Christopher L Hallemeier; Michel G Haddock; William S Harmsen; Amit Mahipal; Robert R McWilliams; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Axel F Grothey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Hordur Kolbeinsson; Allison Hoppe; Aqieda Bayat; Benjamin Kogelschatz; Chineze Mbanugo; Mathew Chung; Andrea Wolf; M Mura Assifi; G Paul Wright Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Kim C Honselmann; Ilaria Pergolini; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Vikram Deshpande; David Ting; Martin S Taylor; Louisa Bolm; Motaz Qadan; Ulrich Wellner; Marta Sandini; Dirk Bausch; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Tobias Keck; Cristina R Ferrone Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 13.787