Literature DB >> 36239806

Minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation in low-risk octogenarians : Observational, retrospective and single-center study.

Tadeja Kolar1,2, Matjaž Bunc3, Matija Jelenc4, Simon Terseglav3, Aleša Kotnik4, Nikola Lakič4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare short-term and mid-term outcomes in low-risk octogenarian population treated with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tf-TAVI) or minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR) for severe aortic stenosis.
METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study we gathered data on low-risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] score < 4%) octogenarians before and after tf-TAVI and mini-AVR performed between January 2013 and May 2019; follow-up was completed in May 2022. Short-term outcomes were hospital length of stay, in-hospital all-cause mortality and other major postoperative outcomes. Mid-term clinical outcomes were 1‑year and 3‑year all-cause mortality. Propensity score-based matching was performed.
RESULTS: In total 106 patients were matched, resulting in 53 pairs. In-hospital complications were similar between the matched groups of patients with the exception of mild and moderate paravalvular leak (mini-AVR vs. tf-TAVI: mild PVL: 3.8% vs. 45.3%, p < 0.001; moderate PVL: 0% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.4952) and of postprocedural acute kidney injury that was more frequent in mini-AVR group (mini-AVR vs. tf-TAVI: 22.6% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.023). Hospital length of stay (p = 0.239) and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.495) did not differ between groups. The 1-year and 3‑year all-cause mortality Kaplan-Meier estimates were similar between mini-AVR and tf-TAVI.
CONCLUSION: In the present study on low-risk octogenarians, transfemoral TAVI and minimally invasive AVR showed comparable short-term and mid-term results. Both procedures are deemed safe and effective. Larger RCTs will be required to determine which low-risk patients will benefit most from TAVI.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Low-risk; Minimally invasive AVR; Octogenarians; TAVI

Year:  2022        PMID: 36239806     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-022-02094-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   2.275


  2 in total

1.  Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Its Incidence, Diagnosis, Clinical Implications, Prevention, Management, and Future Perspectives: A Review Article.

Authors:  Sandeep Bhushan; Xin Huang; Yuan Li; Songlin He; Long Mao; Wang Hong; Zongwei Xiao
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 16.464

2.  Minimally invasive surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Domenico Paparella; Giuseppe Santarpino; Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Marco Moscarelli; Alfredo Marchese; Pietro Guida; Carmine Carbone; Renato Gregorini; Luigi Martinelli; Chiara Comoglio; Roberto Coppola; Alberto Albertini; Alberto Cremonesi; Armando Liso; Khalil Fattouch; Maria Avolio; Natale D Brunetti; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.