| Literature DB >> 36238164 |
Min Uk Kim, Jae Hwan Lee, Chang Jin Yoon, Won Seok Choi, Saebeom Hur, Jin Wook Chung.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the newly designed open-cell type self-expandable nitinol stent (NiTi-stent) for peripheral arteries. Materials andEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 36238164 PMCID: PMC9432195 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2020.81.4.899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi ISSN: 1738-2637
Fig. 1Gross and microscopic findings in the stented minipig iliac artery.
A. A gross specimen of the right iliac artery 1 month after stent insertion.
B. Photomicrograph (hematoxylin & eosin stain, × 100) of the transverse section shows neointimal hyperplasia. The stent strut (white asterisks) is located in the intimal layer. The media is compressed by the strut.
I = intima, M = media, N = neointima
Angiographic Analysis of Stent Patency
| 1 Month | 6 Months | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test ( | Control ( | Test ( | Control ( | |||
| Baseline diameter (mm) | 5.43 ± 0.75 | 5.52 ± 0.37 | 0.893 | 5.84 ± 0.65 | 6.01 ± 0.70 | 0.110 |
| Follow-up diameter (mm) | 5.02 ± 0.85 | 5.09 ± 0.57 | 0.686 | 4.70 ± 0.75 | 3.59 ± 0.92 | 0.015* |
| Late lumen loss (mm) | 0.40 ± 0.31 | 0.43 ± 0.47 | 0.686 | 1.14 ± 0.85 | 2.41 ± 1.22 | 0.028* |
| Angiographic stenosis (%) | 8.27 ± 4.33 | 10.21 ± 4.36 | 0.345 | 18.99 ±13.68 | 39.40 ± 17.23 | 0.028* |
Data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
*Symbol marked values are significantly different from control group.
Histomorphometric Analysis of Stent Patency at 1 Month
| Proximal | Mid | Distal | Individual | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test ( | Control ( | Test ( | Control ( | Test ( | Control ( | Test ( | Control ( | |||||
| IEL area (mm2) | 23.20 ± 0.88 | 22.41 ± 0.97 | 0.345 | 22.15 ± 1.30 | 23.08 ± 0.43 | 0.345 | 21.87 ± 0.93 | 22.30 ± 0.75 | 0.426 | 22.44 ± 0.88 | 22.60 ± 0.54 | 0.945 |
| Lumen area (mm2) | 18.62 ± 1.43 | 16.16 ± 2.23 | 0.071 | 17.17 ± 1.34 | 16.73 ± 1.04 | 0.951 | 17.28 ± 1.17 | 16.27 ± 1.71 | 0.645 | 17.72 ± 1.22 | 16.40 ± 1.57 | 0.456 |
| Neointimal area (mm2) | 4.59 ± 0.68 | 6.24 ± 1.99 | 0.352 | 4.97 ± 0.82 | 6.35 ± 0.67 | 0.071 | 4.59 ± 0.62 | 6.02 ± 1.07 | 0.048* | 4.72 ± 0.56 | 6.20 ± 1.10 | 0.018* |
| Area stenosis (%) | 19.85 ±3.48 | 27.92 ± 9.16 | 0.171 | 22.48 ± 3.45 | 27.57 ± 3.36 | 0.071 | 21.03 ± 2.96 | 27.15 ± 5.74 | 0.048* | 21.10 ± 2.94 | 27.54 ± 5.63 | 0.028* |
| Injury score | 0.90 ± 0.24 | 0.97 ± 0.10 | 0.752 | 0.87 ± 0.08 | 0.95 ± 0.06 | 0.645 | 0.92 ± 0.16 | 0.92 ± 0.20 | 0.945 | 0.9 ± 0.12 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 0.645 |
| Inflammation score | 0.95 ± 0.32 | 1.35 ± 0.41 | 0.251 | 1.20 ± 0.54 | 1.05 ± 0.37 | 0.945 | 1.10 ± 0.51 | 1.40 ± 0.62 | 0.645 | 1.08 ± 0.37 | 1.28 ± 0.39 | 0.721 |
| Fibrin score | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.000 | 0.10 ± 0.22 | 0.10 ± 0.13 | 0.345 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.35 ± 0.41 | 0.371 | 0.04 ± 0.08 | 0.10 ± 0.13 | 0.345 |
| Endothelialization (%) | 100 | 100 | 1.000 | 100 | 100 | 1.000 | 100 | 100 | 1.000 | 100 | 100 | 1.000 |
Data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
*Symbol marked values are significantly different from control group.
IEL = internal elastic lamina
Histomorphometric Analysis of Stent Patency at 6 Months
| Proximal | Mid | Distal | Individual | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test ( | Control ( | Test ( | Control ( | Test ( | Control ( | Test ( | Control ( | |||||
| IEL area (mm2) | 20.37 ± 1.72 | 22.64 ± 2.10 | 0.028* | 20.23 ± 1.24 | 22.81 ± 0.89 | 0.000* | 20.19 ± 1.43 | 22.90 ± 0.86 | 0.000* | 20.49 ± 1.11 | 22.58 ± 1.31 | 0.000* |
| Lumen area (mm2) | 11.47 ± 3.51 | 7.85 ± 2.80 | 0.048* | 10.92 ± 5.06 | 6.51 ± 4.92 | 0.082 | 12.27 ± 3.48 | 6.41 ± 5.17 | 0.031* | 11.49 ± 3.72 | 7.11 ± 3.95 | 0.012* |
| Neointimal area (mm2) | 8.90 ± 4.56 | 14.79 ± 3.95 | 0.121 | 9.31 ± 5.64 | 16.30 ± 4.98 | 0.028* | 7.9 ± 4.22 | 16.48 ± 5.29 | 0.000* | 9.00 ± 4.66 | 15.46 ± 4.41 | 0.028* |
| Area stenosis (%) | 42.71 ± 17.77 | 64.79 ± 13.00 | 0.021* | 45.38 ± 26.08 | 71.42 ± 21.23 | 0.048* | 38.54 ± 18.45 | 71.93 ± 22.54 | 0.000* | 42.92 ± 20.65 | 68.11 ± 17.53 | 0.031* |
| Injury score | 1.05 ± 0.08 | 1.08 ± 0.18 | 0.666 | 1.04 ± 0.04 | 1.15 ± 0.26 | 0.345 | 1.07 ± 0.10 | 1.16 ± 0.20 | 0.245 | 1.06 ± 0.04 | 1.13 ± 0.16 | 0.371 |
| Inflammation score | 1.20 ± 0.35 | 1.29 ± 0.43 | 0.945 | 1.09 ± 0.25 | 1.16 ± 0.32 | 0.666 | 1.24 ± 0.46 | 1.16 ± 0.40 | 0.371 | 1.13 ± 0.18 | 1.24 ± 0.28 | 0.492 |
| Fibrin score | 0.01 ± 0.05 | 0.01 ± 0.05 | 1.000 | 0.07 ± 0.12 | 0.14 ± 0.13 | 0.345 | 0.07 ± 0.16 | 0.05 ± 0.11 | 1.000 | 0.05 ± 0.06 | 0.07 ± 0.06 | 0.845 |
| Endothelialization (%) | 100 | 100 | 1.000 | 100 | 100 | 1.000 | 100 | 100 | 1.000 | 100 | 100 | 1.000 |
Data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
*Symbol marked values are significantly different from control group.
IEL = internal elastic lamina
Fig. 2A gross photograph of the NiTi-stent (A) and SMARTCONTROL stent (B).
Fig. 3A schematic diagram of the structure of the NiTi-stent strut-strut interface.
Fig. 4Photographs of bended NiTi-stent and SMARTCONTROL stent.
When a bending force is applied, the luminal area in the NiTi-stent is maintained at the bending point (A), whereas the SMARTCONTROL-stent shows loss of luminal area at the bending point (B).