Literature DB >> 36238100

Novel botanical active component derivatives containing carboxamide and 1,3,4-Thiadiazole thioether moieties: Design, synthesis, and inhibitory activity.

Pei Li1, Cong Chen1, Rongxi Zhu1, Guixia Yang1, Min Xu1, Guanghua Wan1, Xiang Wang1.   

Abstract

In this study, using the botanical active components of carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, and sesamol as the lead structures, 19 novel botanical active component derivatives containing carboxamide and 1,3,4-thiadiazole thioether moieties (5a-5s) were synthesized and structurally characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS. The antibacterial bioassay results in vitro showed that compound 2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-N-(5-(methylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5k) revealed excellent inhibitory activities against Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac) and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicolaby (Xoc), with the median effective concentration (EC50) values of 22 and 15 μg/ml, respectively, which were even better than those of thiodiazole copper and bismerthiazol. Meanwhile, all the target compounds revealed lower in vitro inhibitory effects on Mucor bainieri (M. bainieri), Mucor fragilis (M. fragilis), and Trichoderma atroviride (T. atroviride), than carbendazim.
Copyright © 2022 Li, Chen, Zhu, Yang, Xu, Wan and Wang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1,3,4-thiadiazole thioether; antibacterial activity; antifungal activity; botanical active component; carboxamide

Year:  2022        PMID: 36238100      PMCID: PMC9551022          DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1036909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Chem        ISSN: 2296-2646            Impact factor:   5.545


1 Introduction

As a serious threat to agricultural production, plant diseases can cause huge economic losses every year (Rosegrant and Cline, 2003; Neeraja et al., 2010; Opara, 2013; Bhattacharjee and Dey, 2014). Although the use of pesticides is an effective method to control plant diseases, the frequent use of traditional pesticides can lead to many negative effects such as pathogenic microorganism resistance, environmental contamination, and human health (Guo et al., 1998). As the improving of human living level and the demand for high-quality agricultural products, a limit on the use of traditional pesticides is required (Chávez-Dulanto et al., 2021). In the 21st century and beyond, use of natural product pesticides to control plant diseases is an innovative approach of sustainable agricultural development (Cantrell et al., 2020; Souto et al., 2021). It is a critical approach to find new active components and to develop new pesticides by modifying the structure of natural products. Botanical active components of carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, and sesamol (Figure 1) had a broad spectrum of pesticide biological properties, such as antifungal and insecticidal activity (Shen and He, 2022; Cui et al., 2022; Jia et al., 2007; Sharifi-Rad et al., 2018; Karina Kachur, 2020; Rathod et al., 2021). However, the inhibitory effects on plant pathogenic bacteria diseases of carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, sesamol and their derivative had not been reported yet. Meanwhile, the carboxamide and 1,3,4-thiadiazole thioether moieties had extensive pesticide biological activities, including antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and insecticidal activity (Dalgaard, et al., 1994; Wu et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2018; Chen, et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021). In our previous work, a series of novel thiochromanone derivatives containing carboxamide and 1,3,4-thiadiazole thioether moieties (Figure 2) were prepared and demonstrated to have suitable antibacterial and antifungal activity (Yu et al., 2020).
FIGURE 1

The structures of botanical active components of carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, and sesamol.

FIGURE 2

Design route of the target compounds 5a−5s.

The structures of botanical active components of carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, and sesamol. Design route of the target compounds 5a−5s. To develop new lead compounds, in this study, we aimed to replace thiochromanone structure in the structure of our reported structures by carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, and sesamol structures to build some new botanical active component derivatives containing carboxamide and 1,3,4-thiadiazole thioether moieties (Figure 2).

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Chemical synthesis

2.1.1 Preparation of intermediates 2 and 4

As shown in Scheme 1, using the botanical active components of carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, and sesamol as the lead structures, intermediates 2 and 4 were prepared using the methods that have been previously reported (Friedrich et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2022).
Scheme 1

Synthetic route for compounds 5a−5s.

Synthetic route for compounds 5a−5s.

2.1.2 Preparation of the target compounds 5a−5s

To a 25 ml round bottom flask, intermediates 2 (20 mmol) and 4 (20 mmol) dissolved in DMF (10 ml), DMAP (2 mmol), and EDCI (30 mmol) were added. After reacting overnight at room temperature, the precipitates obtained by adding distilled water (50 ml) were recrystallized from ethyl acetate to give the target compounds 5a−5s.

2.2 Bioactivity evaluation

The preliminary inhibitory effects results in vitro of compounds 5a−5s against Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac) and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicolaby (Xoc) as well as Mucor bainieri (M. bainieri), Mucor fragilis (M. fragilis), and Trichoderma atroviride (T. atroviride) were determined by the turbidimeter test (for antibacterial activity test) and mycelial growth rate method (for antifungal activity test) (Schaad et al., 1996; Wang et al., 2022). Meanwhile, the median effective concentration (EC50) values of compounds 5a, 5b, 5f, 5k, 5L, and 5n against Xac and Xoc were calculated using the SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, United States).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Chemistry

Using the botanical active components of carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, and sesamol as the lead structures, compounds 5a−5s were prepared in three steps, namely, substitution, thioetherification, and condensation reaction, with the yields of 68%–88% and the melting point ranges within two degrees centigrades. In the 1H NMR spectra of compounds 5a−5s, a singlet at 12.87–12.79 and 4.93–4.81 ppm indicated H atom in CONH and OCH2 groups, respectively. Meanwhile, a singlet at 168.07–167.79 ppm in the 13C NMR spectra indicated C atom in CONH group. In addition, the molecular weights of compounds 5a−5s were assigned by combining the [M + Na]+ ions with the confidence level of 100%. The physical and chemical properties and spectra data for compounds 5a−5s are presented in the following. 2-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)-N-(5-(methylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5a). White solid, yield 77%, mp 152–154°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.85 (s, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (s, 1H), 4.93 (s, 2H), 2.83–2.76 (m, 1H), 2.72 (s, 3H), 2.99 (s, 3H), 1.15 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.99, 161.19, 158.17, 156.19, 147.85, 130.90, 123.95, 119.18, 110.14, 66.82, 33.77, 24.35, 16.38, 16.14; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C15H19N3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 360.08109, found: 360.08046. N-(5-(ethylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(5-isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy) acetamide (5b). White solid, yield 74%, mp 130–131°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.86 (s, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 4.93 (s, 2H), 3.23 (q, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 2.83–2.76 (m, 1H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.34 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 1.15 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 168.04, 159.49, 158.53, 156.18, 147.86, 130.91, 123.94, 119.18, 110.15, 66.82, 33.76, 28.52, 24.35, 16.15, 15.17; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C16H21N3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 374.09674, found: 374.09643. N-(5-(benzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(5-isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy) acetamide (5c). White solid, yield 81%, mp 137–138°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.86 (s, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.34–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (s, 1H), 4.92 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 2.83–2.76 (m, 1H), 2.17 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 168.06, 158.90, 156.16, 147.85, 137.14, 130.91, 129.46, 129.01, 128.06, 123.91, 119.17, 110.11, 66.78, 38.02, 33.76, 24.35, 16.15; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C21H23N3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 436.11239, found: 436.11185. N-(5-((4-fluorobenzyl)thio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(5-isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)acetamide (5d). Yellow solid, yield 86%, mp 140–141°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.86 (s, 1H), 7.47–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 4.93 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 2.83–2.76 (m, 1H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 168.07, 161.98 (d, J = 243.0 Hz), 158.69, 158.16, 147.85, 133.50 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 131.51 (d, J = 9.0 Hz), 130.91, 123.92, 119.18, 115.90, 115.69, 110.12, 66.80, 37.14, 33.76, 24.34, 16.14; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C21H22FN3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 454.10297, found: 454.10241. N-(5-((4-chlorobenzyl)thio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(5-isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)acetamide (5e). Yellow solid, yield 74%, mp 132–134°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.86 (s, 1H), 7.44–7.37 (m, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 4.93 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 2.83–2.76 (m, 1H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 168.06, 158.97, 158.56, 156.16, 147.85, 136.45, 132.64, 131.30, 130.91, 128.94, 123.92, 119.18, 110.13, 66.80, 37.14, 33.76, 24.34, 16.14; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C21H22ClN3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 470.07342, found: 470.07318. 2-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)-N-(5-(methylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5f). White solid, yield 79%, mp 158–160 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.84 (s, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (s, 1H), 4.91 (s, 2H), 2.72 (s, 3H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.16 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.83, 161.15, 158.21, 155.19, 136.33, 126.31, 122.32, 112.82, 66.73, 26.42, 23.15, 21.40, 16.43; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C15H19N3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 360.08109, found: 360.08075. N-(5-(ethylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)acetamide (5g). White solid, yield 78%, mp 168–170°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.87 (s, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 4.91 (s, 2H), 3.34–3.29 (m, 1H), 3.23 (q, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.35 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.16 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.88, 159.45, 158.57, 155.18, 136.34, 133.91, 126.31, 122.33, 112.80, 66.72, 28.54, 26.42, 23.15, 21.40, 15.20; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C16H21N3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 374.09674, found: 374.09632. N-(5-(benzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)acetamide (5h). White solid, yield 88%, mp 133–135°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.86 (s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (s, 1H), 4.91 (s, 2H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 3.34–3.27 (m, 1H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.15 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.89, 158.88, 155.17, 137.13, 136.33, 133.91, 129.45, 129.02, 128.06, 126.30, 122.34, 112.82, 66.74, 38.01, 26.40, 23.16, 21.40; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C21H23N3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 436.11239, found: 436.11185. N-(5-((4-fluorobenzyl)thio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)acetamide (5i). White solid, yield 78%, mp 129–130°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.86 (s, 1H), 7.46 (q, J1 = 4.0 Hz, J2 = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.16 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (s, 1H), 4.91 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 3.34–3.27 (m, 1H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.15 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.91, 161.98 (d, J = 242.0 Hz), 158.98, 158.65, 155.17, 136.33, 133.91, 133.52 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 131.51 (d, J = 8.0 Hz), 126.31, 122.34, 115.82 (d, J = 21.0 Hz), 112.82, 66.74, 37.13, 26.39, 23.15, 21.39; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C21H22FN3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 454.10297, found: 454.10236. N-(5-((4-chlorobenzyl)thio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)acetamide (5j). White solid, yield 82%, mp 138–140°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.85 (s, 1H), 7.41 (q, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 16.0 Hz, 4H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (s, 1H), 4.90 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 3.31–3.26 (m, 1H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.15 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.83, 158.53, 155.16, 136.49, 136.34, 133.91, 132.63, 131.31, 128.97, 126.32, 122.34, 112.82, 66.72, 37.11, 26.39, 23.16, 21.40; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C21H22ClN3O2S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 470.07342, found: 470.07319. 2-(2-Methoxyphenoxy)-N-(5-(methylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5k). Yellow solid, yield 72%, mp 135–136 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.79 (s, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (q, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.72 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.82, 161.17, 158.14, 149.66, 147.64, 122.64, 121.12, 114.87, 113.03, 67.61, 56.03, 16.42; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C12H13N3O3S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 334.02905, found: 334.02896. N-(5-(ethylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)acetamide (5l). White solid, yield 68%, mp 138–140°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.81 (s, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J1 = 4.0 Hz, J2 = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (qd, J1 = 4.0 Hz, J2 = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.89–6.84 (m, 1H), 4.89 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.23 (q, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 1.34 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.88, 159.45, 158.51, 149.65, 147.64, 122.63, 121.12, 114.84, 113.02, 67.59, 56.03, 28.54, 15.19; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C13H15N3O3S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 348.04470, found: 348.04468. N-(5-(benzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)acetamide (5m). White solid, yield 85%, mp 135–136°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.80 (s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.02–6.84 (m, 4H), 4.87 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.87, 158.89, 158.71, 149.63, 147.61, 137.14, 129.47, 129.03, 128.07, 122.63, 121.11, 114.80, 113.00, 67.55, 56.01, 37.99; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C18H17N3O3S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 410.06035, found: 410.06027. N-(5-((4-fluorobenzyl)thio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)acetamide (5n). Yellow solid, yield 77%, mp 137–139°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.81 (s, 1H), 7.47–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.19–7.14 (m, 2H), 7.03–6.84 (m, 4H), 4.88 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.90, 161.99 (d, J = 243.0 Hz), 158.93, 158.66, 149.65, 147.62, 133.53 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 131.54 (d, J = 8.0 Hz), 122.64, 121.11, 115.82 (d, J = 22.0 Hz), 114.84, 113.01, 67.59, 56.02, 37.13; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C18H16FN3O3S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 428.05093, found: 428.05066. N-(5-((4-chlorobenzyl)thio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)acetamide (5o). Yellow solid, yield 79%, mp 136–138 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.81 (s, 1H), 7.44–7.38 (m, 4H), 7.03–6.84 (m, 4H), 4.88 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.91, 158.97, 158.54, 149.65, 147.62, 136.49, 132.64, 131.32, 128.97, 122.64, 121.12, 114.85, 113.01; 67.59, 56.02, 37.13; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C18H16ClN3O3S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 444.02138, found: 444.02089. 2-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yloxy)-N-(5-(methylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5p). Pink solid, yield 78%, mp 171–172°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.85 (s, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 6.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (s, 2H), 4.82 (s, 2H), 2.72 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.79, 161.19, 158.16, 153.47, 148.37, 142.21, 108.43, 106.36, 101.63, 98.61, 67.38, 16.41; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C12H11N3O4S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 348.00832, found: 348.00793. 2-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yloxy)-N-(5-(benzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5q). Pink solid, yield 84%, mp 176–178°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.82 (s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.26 (m, 3H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (s, 1H), 5.97 (s, 2H), 4.81 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.86, 158.93, 153.46, 148.38, 142.22, 137.13, 129.46, 129.03, 128.07, 108.43, 106.34, 101.64, 98.60, 67.36, 38.01; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C18H15N3O4S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 424.03962, found: 424.03902. 2-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yloxy)-N-(5-((4-fluorobenzyl)thio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5r). Yellow solid, yield 79%, mp 165–167°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.83 (s, 1H), 7.47–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (q, J1 = 4.0 Hz, J2 = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (s, 2H), 4.82 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.87, 161.99 (d, J = 243.0 Hz), 158.94, 158.71, 153.45, 148.38, 142.22, 133.51 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 131.52 (d, J = 9.0 Hz), 115.82 (d, J = 21.0 Hz), 108.42, 106.34, 101.63, 101.63, 98.60, 67.36, 37.36; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C18H14FN3O4S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 442.03020, found: 442.02960. 2-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yloxy)-N-(5-((4-chlorobenzyl)thio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5s). Yellow solid, yield 70%, mp 166–168°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.84 (s, 1H), 7.45–7.38 (m, 4H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (q, J1 = 4.0 Hz, J2 = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (s, 2H), 4.82 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.88, 158.99, 158.58, 153.45, 148.38, 142.22, 136.46; Anal. calcd. for m/z of C18H14ClN3O4S2 (HRMS [M + Na]+): 458.00065, found: 458.00023.

3.2 Biological evaluations

Table 1 showed that, at 100 and 50 μg/ml, compounds 5a, 5b, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g, 5k, 5L, and 5n showed significant in vitro inhibitory effect against Xac, with the inhibition rate ranges of 46%–84% and 33%–70%, respectively, which were higher than thiodiazole copper and bismerthiazol. Meanwhile, compounds 5a, 5b, 5f, 5k, 5L, and 5n exhibited excellent in vitro antibacterial activity against Xoc, with the inhibition rate ranges of 71%–92% and 53%–80% at 100 and 50 μg/ml, respectively, which were superior to thiodiazole copper and bismerthiazol. In particular, Table 2 showed that the EC50 values for compound 2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-N-(5-(methylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5k) against Xac and Xoc were 22 and 15 μg/ml, respectively, which were higher than thiodiazole copper and bismerthiazol.
TABLE 1

In vitro antibacterial activity test of compounds 5a−5s against Xac and Xoc.

CompoundsInhibition rate (%) a
XacXoc
100 μg/ml50 μg/ml100 μg/ml50 μg/ml
5a76 ± 2.2160 ± 1.1482 ± 1.2967 ± 1.85
5b67 ± 1.1451 ± 1.7474 ± 2.0161 ± 2.04
5c35 ± 2.0028 ± 1.1142 ± 0.9430 ± 1.24
5d54 ± 2.1142 ± 1.0162 ± 1.5940 ± 2.14
5e46 ± 2.9533 ± 1.0154 ± 1.9431 ± 1.54
5f62 ± 1.1950 ± 1.1073 ± 2.4955 ± 1.29
5g51 ± 1.0940 ± 0.5964 ± 1.9540 ± 0.74
5h32 ± 1.5021 ± 1.5136 ± 2.4928 ± 1.64
5i47 ± 1.1433 ± 2.0455 ± 2.1736 ± 1.74
5j37 ± 0.4925 ± 2.0648 ± 2.1032 ± 1.75
5k84 ± 1.0670 ± 1.9692 ± 1.4980 ± 1.91
5L75 ± 1.1161 ± 1.3384 ± 1.8670 ± 1.65
5m30 ± 1.2218 ± 2.0152 ± 1.5741 ± 2.56
5n52 ± 1.7440 ± 2.0871 ± 1.7453 ± 2.49
5o35 ± 1.2722 ± 1.8460 ± 1.0445 ± 1.99
5p10 ± 2.044 ± 1.1916 ± 2.228 ± 1.64
5q0000
5r008 ± 2.142 ± 0.54
5s0000
Bismerthiazol b 38 ± 2.0230 ± 2.0467 ± 1.5442 ± 2.01
Thiodiazole copper b 30 ± 2.0120 ± 1.6252 ± 1.9437 ± 1.86

Average of three times for each treatment.

The positive control.

TABLE 2

The EC50 values of compounds 5a, 5b, 5f, 5k, 5L, and 5n against Xac and Xoc.

CompoundsInhibition rate (%) a
XacXoc
5a30 ± 1.2523 ± 2.21
5b40 ± 2.6532 ± 1.65
5f45 ± 1.9435 ± 1.26
5k22 ± 1.5415 ± 1.62
5L28 ± 1.2420 ± 0.98
5n50 ± 2.2841 ± 1.97
Bismerthiazol b 142 ± 2.2665 ± 3.24
Thiodiazole copper b 181 ± 4.65102 ± 2.18

Average of three times for each treatment.

The positive control.

In vitro antibacterial activity test of compounds 5a−5s against Xac and Xoc. Average of three times for each treatment. The positive control. The EC50 values of compounds 5a, 5b, 5f, 5k, 5L, and 5n against Xac and Xoc. Average of three times for each treatment. The positive control. Table 3 showed that compounds 5a−5s revealed lower in vitro inhibitory effects against M. bainieri, M. fragilis, and T. atroviride, with the inhibition rate ranges of 0%–51%, 0%–47%, and 0%–21% at 50 μg/ml, respectively, than carbendazim.
TABLE 3

In vitro antifungal activity test of compounds 5a−5s against M. bainieri, M. fragilis, and T. atroviride.

CompoundsInhibition rate (%) a
M. bainieriM. fragilisT. atroviride
5a42 ± 1.5436 ± 1.2611 ± 0.25
5b21 ± 1.2514 ± 2.490
5c000
5d10 ± 1.0200
5e000
5f20 ± 1.4215 ± 1.269 ± 2.24
5g12 ± 2.0110 ± 2.280
5h000
5i2 ± 1.0100
5j000
5k51 ± 1.0447 ± 1.6521 ± 1.36
5L30 ± 1.1125 ± 2.219 ± 2.46
5m8 ± 1.6400
5n20 ± 0.8412 ± 0.540
5o13 ± 2.1700
5p16 ± 1.2812 ± 1.052 ± 1.10
5q000
5r000
5s000
Carbendazim b 100100100

Average of three times for each treatment.

The positive control.

In vitro antifungal activity test of compounds 5a−5s against M. bainieri, M. fragilis, and T. atroviride. Average of three times for each treatment. The positive control.

3.3 Structure-activity relationship analysis

The SAR analysis was analyzed based on the inhibitory activity listed in Tables 1 and 2. First, the presence of the 2-OCH3 group at R1 substituent group showed better inhibitory activity in the order of 5k > 5f, 5k > 5a, and 5k > 5p. Second, the CH3 group at the R2 substituent group could increase the inhibitory activity followed the order of 5a > 5b, 5f > 5g, and 5k > 5L.

4 Conclusion

In conclusion, using the botanical active components of carvacrol, thymol, guaiacol, and sesamol as the lead structures, 19 structurally characterized botanical active component derivatives containing carboxamide and 1,3,4-thiadiazole thioether moieties were prepared. Bioassay results demonstrated that compound 2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-N-(5-(methylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5k) had the higher inhibitory activity against Xac and Xoc than thiodiazole copper and bismerthiazol. Meanwhile, the analysis of SAR results showed that the presence of the 2-OCH3 and CH3 groups at R1 and R2 substituent groups, respectively, could increase the inhibitory effects of the target compounds.
  12 in total

1.  Global food security: challenges and policies.

Authors:  Mark W Rosegrant; Sarah A Cline
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Biotechnological approaches to develop bacterial chitinases as a bioshield against fungal diseases of plants.

Authors:  Chilukoti Neeraja; Kondreddy Anil; Pallinti Purushotham; Katta Suma; Pvsrn Sarma; Bruno M Moerschbacher; Appa Rao Podile
Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.429

Review 3.  Natural products as sources for new pesticides.

Authors:  Charles L Cantrell; Franck E Dayan; Stephen O Duke
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.050

4.  The antibacterial properties of phenolic isomers, carvacrol and thymol.

Authors:  Karina Kachur; Zacharias Suntres
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 11.176

5.  Shape Similarity by Fractal Dimensionality: An Application in the de novo Design of (-)-Englerin A Mimetics.

Authors:  Lukas Friedrich; Ryan Byrne; Aaron Treder; Inderjeet Singh; Christoph Bauer; Thomas Gudermann; Michael Mederos Y Schnitzler; Ursula Storch; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Estimation of bacterial growth rates from turbidimetric and viable count data.

Authors:  P Dalgaard; T Ross; L Kamperman; K Neumeyer; T A McMeekin
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 7.  Carvacrol and human health: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Mehdi Sharifi-Rad; Elena Maria Varoni; Marcello Iriti; Miquel Martorell; William N Setzer; María Del Mar Contreras; Bahare Salehi; Azam Soltani-Nejad; Sadegh Rajabi; Mercedeh Tajbakhsh; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.878

8.  Design, Synthesis, and Bioactivity Evaluation of Novel Isoxazole-Amide Derivatives Containing an Acylhydrazone Moiety as New Active Antiviral Agents.

Authors:  Zai-Bo Yang; Pei Li; Yin-Ju He
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Synthesis and Bioactivities of Novel 1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives of Glucosides.

Authors:  Meihang Chen; Xun Zhang; Daowang Lu; Hairong Luo; Zengyan Zhou; Xufeng Qin; Wenneng Wu; Guoping Zhang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.