| Literature DB >> 36237865 |
Ashish Jain1, Dinakar Bootla1, Sridhar Balaguru1, Raja J Selvaraj1.
Abstract
A young male presented with pre-excited atrial fibrillation. During an electrophysiology study, preexcitation suggestive of a pathway in posteroseptal location was confirmed but no tachycardia was inducible. Para-Hisian pacing was done during sinus rhythm. Is there retrograde conduction through the accessory pathway?Entities:
Keywords: Para‐Hisian pacing; intermittent ventricular capture; paradoxical nodal response; pure His bundle capture
Year: 2022 PMID: 36237865 PMCID: PMC9535742 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arrhythm ISSN: 1880-4276
FIGURE 1Para‐Hisian pacing at pacing cycle length = 600 ms. CS 7–8 to CS 1–2: coronary sinus proximal to distal, His p and His d: His proximal and distal, HRA: high right atrium, RVA: right ventricular apex.
FIGURE 2Para‐Hisian pacing at pacing cycle length = 600 ms. Panel A, same as Figure 1, shows paradoxical nodal response. Panel B shows classical nodal response. Compare the narrow and wide beats in panel A and panel B. Narrow beat in panel A has clear isoelectric interval and separate local ventricular activation while narrow beat in panel B shows slurred onset of QRS and no separate local ventricular activation. Wide beat in panel A is having same stimulus to end of QRS duration as of narrow beat with the initial slurring of QRS while wide beat in panel B is clearly broader than the narrow beat. CS 7–8 to CS 1–2: coronary sinus proximal to distal, His p and His d: His proximal and distal, HRA: high right atrium, RVA: right ventricular apex.