Literature DB >> 36237818

Ceramic Inlays: A Case Report.

Swapnil Pawar1, Vikas Lekhwani2, Hina Ahmed3, Pooja Agrawal4, Prajakta Barapatre5, Pragati Sharma6, Saurabh Gupta7, Bharat Gupta8.   

Abstract

Aesthetic dentistry continues to evolve via advances in bonding agents, restorative materials, and conservative preparation methods. Alternatives to dental amalgam and gold include ceramic dental restorative materials. The lifespan of ceramic inlay repairs is still up for debate. When it comes to durability, colour matching, and anatomical shape stability, ceramic inlay restorations top the list of options. More predictable long-term performance may be achieved by strategically placing ceramic inlays in teeth that are not subjected to significant occlusal stress. Preparation design for ceramic inlay materials is necessary to avoid flexure. This case report discusses the ceramic inlay practice for functional and aesthetic restoration in a patient.
Copyright © 2022, Pawar et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cast inlay; ceramic; endodontics; esthetics; inlay

Year:  2022        PMID: 36237818      PMCID: PMC9553019          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  14 in total

1.  Ceramic inlays: clinical assessment and survival rate.

Authors:  M Fuzzi; G Rappelli
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 2.  Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Markus B Blatz; Avishani Sadan; Matthias Kern
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 3.  Ceramic inlays and onlays: clinical procedures for predictable results.

Authors:  Alfredo Meyer; Luiz Clovis Cardoso; Elito Araujo; Luiz Narciso Baratieri
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.843

Review 4.  Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials.

Authors:  N B Cramer; J W Stansbury; C N Bowman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.

Authors:  Ralf-Thomas Lange; Peter Pfeiffer
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

6.  Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements.

Authors:  J W van Dijken; A Ormin; A L Olofsson
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth.

Authors:  K H Friedl; G Schmalz; K A Hiller; M Shams
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.612

8.  Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica.

Authors:  K J Söderholm; S W Shang
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Strength of Different Ceramic Inlays Produced by CEREC Omnicam and Heat-Pressed Technique.

Authors:  F D Oz; S Bolay
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-04-26

10.  Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review.

Authors:  Christa D Hopp; Martin F Land
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2013-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.