| Literature DB >> 36237696 |
Jinjin Lu1, Feifei Han2, Tomáš Janík3.
Abstract
With an increasing number of international schools, traditional EFL teaching methods may not satisfy students' needs. This study aims to investigate perceptions of social media technologies (e.g., Web 2.0) and willingness to adopt such technologies to collaborate and communicate in multicultural classrooms among novice EFL schoolteachers in the Czech Republic. The participants were 100 novice EFL schoolteachers in Prague and the South Moravian regions of the Czech Republic. The study used a mixed research method consisting of a survey (stage 1) and a semi-structured interview (stage 2). The survey examined the participants' appraisal and concerns of using social media technologies to collaborate and to communicate as well as the level of willingness to use social media technologies. A hierarchical cluster analysis using participants' responses regarding their attitudes and behavioural tendency towards using Web 2.0 social media technologies in language classrooms identified three clusters of teachers. The teachers who were most likely to adopt social Web 2.0 technologies were those who had the highest ratings on both appraisals and concerns regarding the use of social media in language classrooms. The results from the semi-structured interviews were consistent with those from the survey. Together, the results from the two stages demonstrated that most pre-service teachers favoured using Web 2.0 technology for collaboration and communication among colleagues and stakeholders in a broader community, but they displayed contrasting levels of appraisal of and concerns towards using social media technologies. Participants believed that this might be due to their different levels of ICT proficiency, workload, and working environment. The political and practical implications in K-12 education in the Czech context are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: EFL teaching and learning; Web 2.0 technology; education reform; multicultural learners; novice teachers
Year: 2022 PMID: 36237696 PMCID: PMC9552764 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1The project website interface.
Participants’ backgrounds.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
| Percentage (%) | |
|
| ||
| Male | 32 | 32 |
| Female | 68 | 68 |
|
| ||
| Less than 1 year | 8 | 8 |
| 1–3 years | 15 | 15 |
| 3–5 years (not including five) | 77 | 77 |
|
| ||
| International kindergarten | 4 | 4 |
| Public primary and secondary schools | 34 | 34 |
| International primary schools | 2 | 2 |
| Public middle-high schools | 32 | 32 |
| International middle schools | 1 | 1 |
| Other | 4 | 4 |
|
| ||
| Below average | 56 | 2 |
| Poor | 8 | 8 |
| Average | 46 | 46 |
| Above average | 44 | 31 |
| Excellent | 13 | 13 |
Interviewees’ information.
| Participants | Schools | Teaching experience |
|---|---|---|
| P1 (Female) | Public primary | 1 year |
| P2 (Female) | Public secondary | 6 months |
| P3 (Female) | Public secondary | 8 months |
| P4 (Male) | International high school | 1 year |
| P5 (Female) | Public primary | 2.5 years |
| P6 (Female) | Public primary | 2 years |
| P7 (Male) | International high school | 3 years |
Results of the EFA and reliability of the questionnaire.
| Scales | Description of items | Rotated factor loadings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appraisal of using social Web 2.0 technologies (α = 0.89) | An interactive website (digital habitat) like this can help enhance the collaboration in teaching practise among English teachers. | 0.72 | ||
| An interactive website (digital habitat) like this can help improve my knowledge of technological tools used in English language teaching. | 0.54 | |||
| An interactive website (digital habitat) like this can help expand my networks within the English groups domestically and internationally. | 0.84 | |||
| Concerns regarding the use of social Web 2.0 technologies (α = 0.86) | I am concerned that adoption of social media tools on the interactive website (digital habitat) can be risky. | 0.78 | ||
| I am concerned regarding the confidentiality of the information on the interactive website (digital habitat). | 0.81 | |||
| I am concerned about the quality of the resources that are provided on the interactive website (digital habitat). | 0.76 | |||
| Behavioural tendencies regarding the use of social Web 2.0 technologies (α = 0.73) | I am willing to ask questions related to English language teaching and learning on this interactive website (digital habitat). | 0.76 | ||
| I am willing to answer questions other people propose about English language teaching and learning on this interactive website (digital habitat). | 0.75 | |||
| I am willing to share resources with others on this interactive website (digital habitat). | 0.82 | |||
| I am willing to communicate with (other) experienced English teachers using an interactive website like this (digital habitat). | 0.77 | |||
| I am willing to communicate with (other) parents using an interactive website like this (digital habitat). | 0.83 | |||
| I am willing to collaborate with (other) school professionals using an interactive website like this (digital habitat). | 0.80 | |||
| I am willing to collaborate with (other) novice English teachers on an interactive website like this (digital habitat). | 0.85 | |||
Values less than.50 were removed; KMO: 0.91.
Results of one-way ANOVAs by teachers’ self-ratings of their IT proficiency.
| Scales | Low IT proficiency ( | High IT proficiency ( |
|
| η2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Appraisal of using social Web 2.0 technologies | 3.58 | 4.08 | 12.72 | 0.00 | 0.12 |
| Concern regarding the use of social Web 2.0 technologies | 3.35 | 3.90 | 13.16 | 0.00 | 0.12 |
| Behavioural tendencies regarding the use of social Web 2.0 technologies | 3.45 | 3.88 | 6.52 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
Results of one-way ANOVAs and post-hoc analyses based on Czech teachers’ profiles.
| Scales | Clusters |
|
|
| η2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appraisal of using social Web 2.0 technologies | cluster 1 | 3.93 | 63.86 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 1 > 2 |
| cluster 2 | 3.01 | 1 < 3 | ||||
| cluster 3 | 4.65 | 2 < 3 | ||||
| Concern regarding the use of social Web 2.0 technologies | cluster 1 | 3.46 | 32.03 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 1 = 2 |
| cluster 2 | 3.18 | 1 < 3 | ||||
| cluster 3 | 4.63 | 2 < 3 | ||||
| Behavioural tendencies regarding the use of social Web 2.0 technologies | cluster 1 | 3.83 | 94.42 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 1 > 2 |
| cluster 2 | 2.65 | 1 < 3 | ||||
| cluster 3 | 4.63 | 2 < 3 |
Results of the cross-tabulation analysis.
| Teachers’ profiles | Count % within the cluster | Low IT proficiency | High IT proficiency | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 | Count | 34a | 20a | 54 |
| % within the cluster | 63.0% | 37.0% | 100.0% | |
| Cluster 2 | Count | 20a | 8a | 28 |
| % within the cluster | 71.4% | 28.6% | 100.0% | |
| Cluster 3 | Count | 2a | 16b | 18 |
| % within the cluster | 11.1% | 88.9% | 100.0% | |
| Total | Count | 56 | 44 | 100 |
| % within the cluster | 56.0% | 44.0% | 100.0% |
The different subscript letters denote the proportions of the self-rated categories within each cluster that significantly differed from each other at the 0.05 level.