| Literature DB >> 36237557 |
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to systematically assess the effect of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) associated with conventional drugs on the score of dry eye symptoms in patients with dry eyes after cataract surgery.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36237557 PMCID: PMC9553351 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5142851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.974
Figure 1Illustration of literature screening.
Basic characteristics of literature.
| Literature included | Year of publication | N (C/T) | Intervention method | Outcome index | Treatment time | Grouping method | Blind or not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | T | |||||||
| Zeng [ | 2018 | 44/44 | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops + rhEGF | ①②③④ | 4 weeks | Random, but the method is not specified | No |
| Chen [ | 2019 | 150/150 | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops + rhEGF | ①②③④ | 4 weeks | Random, but the method is not specified | No |
| Jin [ | 2018 | 42/42 | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops + rhEGF | ①②③④ | 2 months | Random, but the method is not specified | No |
| Li [ | 2017 | 43/43 | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops + rhEGF | ①②③⑤ | 4 weeks | Random number method | No |
| Shen [ | 2018 | 50/50 | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops + rhEGF | ①②⑤ | 4 weeks | Order of admission | No |
| Teng [ | 2017 | 40/40 | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops + rhEGF | ①②③④⑤ | 4 weeks | Random, but the method is not specified | No |
| Zhang [ | 2019 | 35/35 | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops + rhEGF | ①②④ | 8 weeks | The method is not specified | No |
| Zhao [ | 2018 | 35/35 | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops | Sodium hyaluronate eye drops + rhEGF | ①②③④⑤ | 4 weeks | Random number table method | No |
Note. C: control group; T: study group; rhEGF: rhEGF; ①: treatment successful rate; ②: FL Scoring; ③: BUT; ④: SIT; ⑤: dry eye symptom score.
Figure 2Risk bias chart.
Figure 3Summary chart of risk bias.
Figure 4Forest analysis map of the comparison of treatment efficiency.
Figure 5FL score after treatment.
Figure 6Forest analysis map of comparison of BUT between the two groups after treatment.
Figure 7Forest analysis map of the condition of slab after treatment.
Figure 8Forest analysis map of the dry eye symptom score.
Figure 9Funnel chart with successful treatment.