| Literature DB >> 36237529 |
Meiyao Wang1,2, Jiachun Ge3, Xingkong Ma3, Shengyan Su1,2, Can Tian4, Jianlin Li1, Fan Yu1, Hongxia Li1,2, Changyou Song1,2, Jiancao Gao1, Pao Xu1,2, Yongkai Tang1,2, Gangchun Xu1,2.
Abstract
Eriocheir sinensis is widely appreciated by the surrounding population due to its culinary delicacy and rich nutrients. The E. sinensis breeding industry is very prosperous and molting is one of the important growth characteristics. Research on the regulation of molting in E. sinensis is still in the initial stages. There is currently no relevant information on the regulatory mechanisms of heart development following molting. Comparative transcriptome analysis was used to study developmental regulation mechanisms in the heart of E. sinensis at the post-molt and inter-molt stages. The results indicated that many regulatory pathways and genes involved in regeneration, anti-oxidation, anti-aging and the immune response were significantly upregulated after molting in E. sinensis. Aside from cardiac development, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were relevant to myocardial movement and neuronal signal transduction. DEGs were also related to the regulation of glutathione homeostasis and biological rhythms in regard to anti-oxidation and anti-aging, and to the regulation of immune cell development and the immune response. This study provides a theoretical framework for understanding the regulation of molting in E. sinensis and in other economically important crustaceans.Entities:
Keywords: Eriocheir sinensis; comparative transcriptome; heart; post-molt stage; regeneration
Year: 2022 PMID: 36237529 PMCID: PMC9552667 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.948511
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
Body size parameters for the E. sinensis study samples.
| ID | Weight (g) | Carapace length (mm) | Carapace width (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MP1-F | 9.1 | 25.1 | 27.7 |
| MP1-M | 10.6 | 25.7 | 29.9 |
| MP2-F | 8.9 | 24.6 | 27.1 |
| MP2-M | 11.1 | 26.5 | 28.8 |
| MP3-F | 8.8 | 24.9 | 27.2 |
| MP3-M | 9.9 | 25.6 | 27.5 |
| MI1-F | 9.3 | 24.3 | 27.9 |
| MI1-M | 12.1 | 27.4 | 29.9 |
| MI2-F | 9.3 | 24.6 | 28.1 |
| MI2-M | 10.3 | 25.9 | 28.9 |
| MI3-F | 9 | 23.1 | 26.1 |
| MI3-M | 11.6 | 26.6 | 29.1 |
NOTE: MP1-F ∼ MP3-F: three female E. sinensis at post-molt stage in three aquariums; MP1-M ∼ MP3-M: three male E. sinensis at post-molt stage in three aquariums.
MI1-F ∼ MI3-F: three female E. sinensis at inter-molt stage in three aquariums; MI1-M ∼ MI3-M: three male E. sinensis at inter-molt stage in three aquariums.
Summary of heart transcriptome sequencing for E. sinensis.
| Sample | Raw reads | Raw bases | Clean reads | Clean bases | Q20 (%) | GC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP1 | 45,247,234 | 6,787,085,100 | 44,927,568 | 6,638,048,172 | 95.26 | 49.9 |
| MP2 | 45,992,206 | 6,898,830,900 | 44,973,304 | 6,646,604,598 | 96.02 | 50.3 |
| MP3 | 46,182,912 | 6,927,436,800 | 45,784,144 | 6,773,764,105 | 95.9 | 51.1 |
| MI1 | 45,969,580 | 6,895,437,000 | 45,114,446 | 6,683,254,030 | 95.70 | 50.64 |
| MI2 | 45,288,168 | 6,793,225,200 | 4,4501,478 | 6,592,448,951 | 95.61 | 50.1 |
| MI3 | 46,311,928 | 6,946,789,200 | 45,844,536 | 6,788,658,891 | 95.59 | 49.7 |
NOTE: MP1-3: three replicates of heart of postmolt E. sinensis; MI1-3:three replicates of heart of Intermolt E. sinensis.
Q20: ratio of bases with Phred quality score larger than 20 in raw bases.
FIGURE 1Top 30 GO terms. The numbers on the right represent the number of DEGs in each term.
FIGURE 2Top 30 KEGG pathways. The numbers on the right represent the number of DEGs in each term.
FIGURE 3Volcano plot of DEGs in this study.
Key DEGs in heart transcriptome of E. sinensis.
| Category | Gene name | Gene definition | log2Foldchange |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regeneration |
| Actin, aortic smooth muscle | 1.537 | 0.008 |
|
| Cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein COX15 homolog | 1.133 | 0.014 | |
|
| cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein 21 | 1.609 | 0.021 | |
|
| Frizzled-1 | 2.029 | 0.031 | |
|
| Ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP1 | 4.369 | 0.000 | |
|
| Calponin-1 | 2.489 | 0.002 | |
|
| Frizzled-7 | 3.668 | 0.000 | |
|
| Brahma-associated protein of 60 kDa | 7.206 | 0.000 | |
|
| Protein Wnt-2 | 3.262 | 0.005 | |
|
| Protein Wnt-5b | 5.171 | 0.020 | |
|
| Glutamate [NMDA] receptor subunit 1 | 6.389 | 0.001 | |
|
| Plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 2 | 5.779 | 0.005 | |
|
| BDNF/NT-3 growth factors receptor | 6.034 | 0.003 | |
|
| Ecdysone receptor | -5.224 | 0.019 | |
|
| Twitchin | 6.974 | 0.000 | |
|
| Carboxyl-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase protein | 8.685 | 0.000 | |
|
| Myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 | 1.107 | 0.031 | |
|
| Protein timeless | 2.210 | 0.045 | |
| Antioxidation and anti-aging |
| Glutamate--cysteine ligase catalytic subunit | 3.617 | 0.000 |
|
| Glutathione hydrolase 1 proenzyme | 1.256 | 0.000 | |
|
| Glutathione S-transferase 1, isoform C | 6.480 | 0.001 | |
|
| Glutathione-independent glyoxalase DJR-1.1 | 8.008 | 0.000 | |
|
| General transcription and DNA repair factor IIH helicase subunit XPD | 3.737 | 0.000 | |
|
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase, dimeric NADP-preferring | 3.037 | 0.000 | |
|
| D-amino-acid oxidase | -2.806 | 0.034 | |
|
| The general transcription and DNA repair factor IIH helicase subunit XPD | 3.23 | 0.002 | |
|
| Ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 2 | 8.626 | 0.000 | |
|
| Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase | 2.080 | 0.005 | |
| Immune response regulaiton |
| Integrin alpha-4 | 4.098 | 0.000 |
|
| Autophagy protein 5 | 1.488 | 0.019 | |
|
| Kinesin-associated protein 3 | 4.712 | 0.047 | |
|
| Legumain | 2.024 | 0.000 | |
|
| Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma | 1.286 | 0.002 | |
|
| Proliferating cell nuclear antigen | 2.856 | 0.000 | |
|
| Spondin-2 | 1.567 | 0.000 | |
|
| E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL-B | 6.695 | 0.000 |
FIGURE 4Regulatory network in the heart of E. sinensis identified between the post-molt and inter-molt stages.
FIGURE 5Validation of RNA-seq data by qPCR. X-axis, detected gene names; Y-axis, the relative expression level was expressed as log2 (fold change) in gene expression.
FIGURE 6Correlation analysis on the detected DEGs of qPCR.