Literature DB >> 36237480

The paradox behind the pattern of rapid adaptive radiation: how can the speciation process sustain itself through an early burst?

Christopher H Martin1,2, Emilie J Richards1,2.   

Abstract

Rapid adaptive radiation poses a distinct question apart from speciation and adaptation: what happens after one speciation event? That is, how are some lineages able to continue speciating through a rapid burst? This question connects global macroevolutionary patterns to microevolutionary processes. Here we review major features of rapid radiations in nature and their mismatch with theoretical models and what is currently known about speciation mechanisms. Rapid radiations occur on three major diversification axes - species richness, phenotypic disparity, and ecological diversity - with exceptional outliers on each axis. The paradox is that the hallmark early stage of adaptive radiation, a rapid burst of speciation and niche diversification, is contradicted by most existing speciation models which instead predict continuously decelerating speciation rates and niche subdivision through time. Furthermore, while speciation mechanisms such as magic traits, phenotype matching, and physical linkage of co-adapted alleles promote speciation, it is often not discussed how these mechanisms could promote multiple speciation events in rapid succession. Additional mechanisms beyond ecological opportunity are needed to understand how rapid radiations occur. We review the evidence for five emerging theories: 1) the 'transporter' hypothesis: introgression and the ancient origins of adaptive alleles, 2) the 'signal complexity' hypothesis: the dimensionality of sexual traits, 3) the connectivity of fitness landscapes, 4) 'diversity begets diversity', and 5) flexible stem/'plasticity first'. We propose new questions and predictions to guide future work on the mechanisms underlying the rare origins of rapid radiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive dynamics; adaptive radiation; disruptive selection; early burst; ecological opportunity; fitness landscape; hybridization; introgression; mate choice; speciation

Year:  2019        PMID: 36237480      PMCID: PMC9555815          DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst        ISSN: 1543-592X            Impact factor:   14.340


  164 in total

Review 1.  Novelty and Innovation in the History of Life.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Modular skeletal evolution in sticklebacks is controlled by additive and clustered quantitative trait Loci.

Authors:  Craig T Miller; Andrew M Glazer; Brian R Summers; Benjamin K Blackman; Andrew R Norman; Michael D Shapiro; Bonnie L Cole; Catherine L Peichel; Dolph Schluter; David M Kingsley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Adaptation of a quantitative trait to a moving optimum.

Authors:  Michael Kopp; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Explosive evolutionary radiations: decreasing speciation or increasing extinction through time?

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky; Irby J Lovette
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Revisiting Santa Rosalia to unfold a degeneracy of classic models of speciation.

Authors:  Povilas Norvaišas; Eva Kisdi
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Models of speciation: where are we now?

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  New evidence for the recent divergence of Devil's Hole pupfish and the plausibility of elevated mutation rates in endangered taxa.

Authors:  Christopher H Martin; Sebastian Höhna
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Molecular and morphological evolution of the amphipod radiation of Lake Baikal.

Authors:  Kenneth S MacDonald; Lev Yampolsky; J Emmett Duffy
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  Genetic incompatibilities in killifish and the role of environment.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA.

Authors:  Emilia Huerta-Sánchez; Xin Jin; Zhuoma Bianba; Benjamin M Peter; Nicolas Vinckenbosch; Yu Liang; Xin Yi; Mingze He; Mehmet Somel; Peixiang Ni; Bo Wang; Xiaohua Ou; Jiangbai Luosang; Zha Xi Ping Cuo; Kui Li; Guoyi Gao; Ye Yin; Wei Wang; Xiuqing Zhang; Xun Xu; Huanming Yang; Yingrui Li; Jian Wang; Jun Wang; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.