| Literature DB >> 36237358 |
Jinho Jeong, Chang Suk Park, Jung Whee Lee, Kijun Kim, Hyeon Sook Kim, Sun-Young Jun, Se-Jeong Oh.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the correlation between computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) parameters in 3-tesla (T) MRI and pathologic immunohistochemical (IHC) markers in invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST). Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Breast Neoplasms; Computer-Assisted Diagnosis; Immunohistochemistry; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Year: 2021 PMID: 36237358 PMCID: PMC9238214 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi ISSN: 1738-2637
Fig. 1MR images with a computer-aided detection color overlay map in a 47-year-old female with histologic and nuclear grade 3, Ki-67 positive, estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positive, luminal B subtype invasive carcinoma of no special type in the right breast.
A. Postcontrast T1-weighted image in the early phase shows an irregular and heterogenously enhancing mass in the outer portion of the right breast.
B. Areas in red, yellow, and blue indicate washout delayed enhancement, plateau-delayed enhancement, and persistent delayed enhancement patterns, respectively. Kinetic curve shows a rapid early enhancement and a delayed washout-type curve. The initial peak enhancement value is 282%. With respect to the delayed-phase enhancement, 57% of the mass represents washout, 21% of the mass represents a persistent-type curve, and 21% represents a plateau-type curve.
CAD Parameters of Invasive Carcinoma, NST (NST Carcinoma)
CAD = computer-aided diagnosis, max = maximum, min = minimum, NST = no special type, SD = standard deviation
IHC Markers and CAD Parameters of NST Carcinoma
*†Different letters indicate significant differences between groups based on the Dwass, Steel, Critchlow-Fligner multiple comparison analysis.
CAD = computer-aided diagnosis, EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor, ER = estrogen receptor, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2, IHC = immunohistochemistry, LA = luminal A, LB = luminal B, NST = no special type, PR = progesterone receptor, TN = triple negative
Spearman Correlation between Pathology Size and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Parameters of NST Carcinoma
NST = no special type
Results of the Univariate Binary Logistic Regression Analysis between Immunohistochemistry Markers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Parameters
*Nuclear grade was grouped into 1 and 2 + 3.
†Histologic grade was grouped into 1 and 2 + 3.
‡Subtype was grouped into luminal (luminal A and B subtypes) and nonluminal (HER2 overexpression and triple negative subtypes).
CI = confidence interval, ER = estrogen receptor, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2, LN = lymph node, NST = no special type, PR = progesterone receptor
Fig. 2MR images with a computer-aided detection color overlay map in a 61-year-old female with high angiovolume (6.1 cc) and non-luminal subtype (HER2-overexpression subtype; estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, HER2-positive and Ki-67-positive) invasive carcinoma of no special type in the left breast, showing histologic and nuclear grade 3. Regional lymph node was metastasis-positive.
A. Postcontrast T1-weighted image in the early phase shows an irregular and heterogeneously enhancing mass in the upper inner quadrant of the left breast.
B. Kinetic curve graph shows a rapid early enhancement and a delayed washout-type curve. The initial peak enhancement value is 521%. With respect to the delayed-phase enhancement, 25% of the mass represents washout, 57% of the mass represents a persistent-type curve, and 17% represents a plateau-type curve.
HER2 = human epidermal growth factor 2