| Literature DB >> 36237287 |
Elena Ricci1, Simone Ciccarelli1, Paola Agnese Mauri1, Sandro Gerli2, Alessandro Favilli2, Sonia Cipriani3, Francesco Fedele1, Elena Roncella3, Giovanna Esposito1, Fabio Parazzini1, Michele Vignali4.
Abstract
Periodontal disease (PD) has been shown to increase the risk of preterm birth, preeclampsia and low birth weight. These observations have suggested that PD may also affect the early phase of pregnancy, including conception. The present study aimed to evaluate whether an association exists between oral health status and the chance of clinical pregnancy, according to the currently published literature, by performing a systematic review. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from their start dates to October 2021 using the following keywords: 'Infertility' OR 'conception' OR 'pre-pregnancy' OR 'time-to-pregnancy' AND 'periodontitis' OR 'periodontal disease' OR 'dental infection' OR 'gingivitis' OR 'odontogenic infection' (limits: Full article, English, Human). A total of 6 papers reporting observational information on PD and spontaneous (4 studies) or medically induced conception (2 studies) were retrieved. As such, there were limited studies with different designs (randomized controlled trials and observational studies) and different settings. Moreover, in the selected studies, the ethnicity of the women was heterogeneous. According to the limited published literature, oral health might affect fertility in women. However, only results from prospective randomized trials, comparing PD treatment vs. no treatment in women seeking pregnancy, may clarify the real effectiveness of treatment in improving the conception rate. Copyright: © Ricci et al.Entities:
Keywords: conception; infertility; oral health; periodontal disease; pregnancy
Year: 2022 PMID: 36237287 PMCID: PMC9500491 DOI: 10.3892/br.2022.1569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Rep ISSN: 2049-9434
Patient, intervention, comparator, outcome, study design criteria for the inclusion and exclusion of studies.
| Parameter | Inclusion criteria | Data extraction |
|---|---|---|
| Patient | Women seeking pregnancy | Location, age, type of patients |
| Intervention | Assessment of dental health | Type of assessment |
| Comparator | Absence of periodontitis | Group definition |
| Outcome | Clinical pregnancy (yes/no) | Details of conception |
| Study | Cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies | Type of study design |
Characteristics of selected studies.
| First author, year | Country | Type of study | Sample size | Criteria of diagnosis of PD | Confounders | Study quality | Outcome-results | (Refs.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spontaneous conception | ||||||||
| Hart | Australia | Sub-analysis of a RCT of treatment for PD in mid-pregnancy | 1,956 planned pregnancies; 1,439 pregnancies without PD; 517 pregnancies with PD | Presence of pockets ≥4-mm deep at ≥12 probing sites in fully erupted teeth | BMI, ethnicity, smoking | 9/9 | TTC >12 months Reference: Caucasian women without PD. Non-Caucasian women with PD: 13.9 vs. 6.2%; OR, 2.88 (95% CI, 1.62-5.12); P<0.001. Caucasian women with PD: 8.6 vs. 6.2%; OR, 1.15 (95% CI, 0.74-1.79); P=0.534 | ( |
| Nwhator | Nigeria | Cross sectional study | 70 women | Oral hygiene index score, commu nity periodontal index and periodontitis risk score using matrix metalloproteinase-8 (neutrophil collagenase-2) | Age | 4/8 | TTC, <12 months. Periodontitis risk score associ ated with odds of TTC: OR, 0.157; 95% CI, 0.041-0.600; P<0.01 | ( |
| Paju | Finland | Observational prospective study | 256 women | Major periodontal pathogens in the saliva and serum, and saliva antibodies against major periodontal pathogens | Age, current smoking, socioeconomic status, bacterial vaginosis, previous deliv eries, and clinical periodontal attachment loss | 8/9 | Not becoming pregnant within a year. Women positive for | ( |
| Bond | USA | Prospective cohort study | 2,764 pregnancy planners; 1,506 pregnancies in women; 2,499 women without PD diagnosis; 152 pregnancies in 265 women with PD diagnosis | Self-reported diagnosis of PD | Ethnicity, history of bacterial vaginosis, diabetes, endometriosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome, age, education, annual income, BMI in kg/m2, insurance coverage, weekly servings of sugar-sweetened soft drinks, marital status, current employment, partner's education level, maternal and paternal education level, use of a prenatal or multi-vitamin at baseline, use of folic acid supplementation at baseline, use of vitamin D supplementation at baseline, frequency of intercourse at baseline, doing anything to improve conception chances at baseline, healthy eating index score, parity, smoking | 6/9 | Time to pregnancy. Reference: Women without self-reported PD diagnosis. Women with self-reported PD diagnosis: aFR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.75-1.06). Reference: Women without self-reported PD treatment. Women with self-reported PD treatment: aFR, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.94) | ( |
| Pavlatou | Greece | Cohort study | 20 women with healthy periodontium; 19 women with gingivitis; 21 women with periodontitis | Gingivitis was defined as >10% of surfaces bleeding after light mechan ical stimulation by the periodontal probe with no evidence of periodontal pockets. Adult periodontitis was defined when two or more sites exhib ited a probing depth of ≥4 mm | Not reported | 7/9 | Number of follicles, number of embryos, attainment of pregnancy. Trend for negative correlation between the number of follicles, transferred embryos, attainment of pregnancy and the gingival index was recorded in all women | ( |
| Khalife | Jordan | Cohort study | 17 women with mild/moderate gingivitis; 7 women with severe gingivitis (PD) | Women were classified as having gingivitis if no pocketing (≤3 mm) and no bleeding on probing were observed; chronic periodontitis was defined as pockets (≥4 mm) in two or more sites and bleeding on probing | Not reported | 6/9 | No difference between women with mild and severe gingivitis | ( |
RCT, randomized controlled trial; PD, periodontal disease; TTC, time taken to conceive; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; BMI, body mass index; aFR, adjusted fecundability ratio.
Study quality evaluation according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
| First author, year | Type of study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome (CS)/exposure (CC) | Study quality[ | (Refs.) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy women | |||||||||
| Hart | Cohort | 1 | * | 1 | * | 1 | * | 9/9 | ( |
| 2 | * | 2 | * | 2 | * | ||||
| 3 | * | 3 | * | ||||||
| 4 | * | ||||||||
| Nwhator | Cross-sectional | 1 | * | 1 | * | 1 | * | 4/8 | ( |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | * | ||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| Paju | Cohort | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | * | 8/9 | ( | |
| 2 | * | 2 | * | 2 | * | ||||
| 3 | * | 3 | * | ||||||
| 4 | * | ||||||||
| Bond | Cohort | 1 | 1 | * | 1 | 6/9 | ( | ||
| 2 | * | 2 | * | 2 | * | ||||
| 3 | 3 | * | |||||||
| 4 | * | ||||||||
| Women from Fertility Clinics | |||||||||
| Pavlatou A | Cohort | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | * | 7/9 | ( | |
| 2 | * | 2 | 2 | * | |||||
| 3 | * | 3 | * | ||||||
| 4 | * | ||||||||
| Khalife | Cohort | 1 | * | 1 | 1 | * | 6/9 | ( | |
| 2 | * | 2 | 2 | * | |||||
| 3 | * | 3 | |||||||
| 4 | * | ||||||||
aThe Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was used for CC and CS, with a maximum score of 9(14). For the assessment of cross-sectional studies, an adapted version was used with a maximum score of 8(15). CC, case-control; CS, cohort studies.