Kim López-Güell1, Nicolas Forrer2, Xavier Cartoixà3, Ilaria Zardo2,4, Riccardo Rurali1. 1. Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona, ICMAB-CSIC, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain. 2. Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. 3. Departament d'Enginyeria Electrònica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain. 4. Swiss Nanoscience Institute, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
Crystal phase engineering gives access to new types of periodic nanostructures, such as the so-called twinning superlattices, where the motif of the superlattice is determined by a periodic rotation of the crystal. Here, by means of atomistic nonequilibrium molecular dynamics calculations, we study to what extent these periodic systems can be used to alter phonon transport in a controlled way, similar to what has been predicted and observed in conventional superlattices based on heterointerfaces. We focus on twinning superlattices in GaAs and InAs and highlight the existence of two different transport regimes: in one, each interface behaves like an independent scatterer; in the other, a segment with a sufficiently large number of closely spaced interfaces is seen by propagating phonons as a metamaterial with its own thermal properties. In this second scenario, we distinguish the case where the phonon mean free path is smaller or larger than the superlattice segment, pointing out a different dependence of the thermal resistance with the number of interfaces.
Crystal phase engineering gives access to new types of periodic nanostructures, such as the so-called twinning superlattices, where the motif of the superlattice is determined by a periodic rotation of the crystal. Here, by means of atomistic nonequilibrium molecular dynamics calculations, we study to what extent these periodic systems can be used to alter phonon transport in a controlled way, similar to what has been predicted and observed in conventional superlattices based on heterointerfaces. We focus on twinning superlattices in GaAs and InAs and highlight the existence of two different transport regimes: in one, each interface behaves like an independent scatterer; in the other, a segment with a sufficiently large number of closely spaced interfaces is seen by propagating phonons as a metamaterial with its own thermal properties. In this second scenario, we distinguish the case where the phonon mean free path is smaller or larger than the superlattice segment, pointing out a different dependence of the thermal resistance with the number of interfaces.
The design of materials with tailor-made
thermal properties is
very attractive for several applications, ranging from efficient thermoelectrics[1,2] to thermal management.[3] A way to engineer
the phonon spectrum of a material, and thus to tune its thermal conductivity,
is by creating superlattices, where wave interference creates forbidden
energy band gaps for phonons.[4,5] An additional interest
in superlattices is that they allow, in principle, to observe the
crossover from a particle- to a wave-like phonon transport regime,
a topic of both fundamental and applied importance. When phonons travel
across far-apart interfaces, they are better described as particles
that suffer multiple independent diffusive scattering events, each
one characterized by the thermal boundary resistance (TBR) of that
interface.[6−8] When the number of interfaces or their density increases,
interference effects can build up, and heat transport is better understood
by taking into account the wave nature of phonons. In the first situation,
the thermal conductance is tuned by controlling the number of interfaces;
once the coherent regime kicks-in, on the other hand, the main control
knob becomes the periodicity of the superlattice, which, in turn,
determines the details of the phonon dispersion of the metamaterial,
including the position and width of the phonon band gaps.[5,9−11] This transition typically occurs by making the interface
spacing of the same order of the phonon mean free path,[9] a goal that can be achieved by either increasing
the interface density (i.e., reducing the superlattice period) or
decreasing the temperature.[12,13] Experimental indications
of these effects have been reported in GaAs/AlAs[14] and perovskite oxides superlattices.[15] In this scenario, the quality of each individual interface
is almost as important as their periodic arrangement.[16,17] Indeed, atomic-scale corrugations[16,18−21] and interfacial chemical mixing[22,23] have been
shown to largely suppress the coherence of phonon transport. Therefore,
the design of unconventional periodic structures, beyond the usual
heterostructured superlattices, is attracting considerable attention.[24−26]The increased control in the growth of semiconducting nanowires
(NWs)[27,28] has brought attention to a novel type of
superlattice, where, rather than chemically different materials, different
crystal phases of the same material—typically zincblende and
wurtzite segments of arsenides and phosphides—alternate with
a well-defined periodicity. These crystal phase superlattices[29−31] are made of homojunctions that have (i) minimal lattice mismatch
and (ii) no chemical intermixing and thus are virtually atomically
flat. An even subtler kind of periodic superstructure that can be
obtained in NWs is the so-called twinning superlattice (TSL).[32,33] Here, both the material and the crystal phase are the same throughout
the entire NW length, and the motif of the superlattice is determined
by a periodic rotation of the crystal lattice, which induces the formation
of a stacking planar defect that we refer to as a twin boundary. TSLs
of practical interest are made of zincblende materials that feature
a 60° rotation of the crystal lattice, so that the ABC stacking
along the [111] crystal axis switches to ACB after each twin boundary
(see the sketch in Figure a); see ref (34) for other types of twin boundaries.
Figure 1
(a) Zoomed view of a twin defect, showing
the change from ABC to
ACB stacking. (b) Cross-sectional view of the computational cell,
where a = b = 39.97 Å for GaAs
and 42.85 Å for InAs. (c) Segment of a TSL containing one full
period, L = 2δ, where δ is the separation
between adjacent twins. The red dashed lines indicate the position
of the twins, while the black dashed line shows the unit cell of the
zincblende, when the [111] crystal axis is taken to be parallel to
the cartesian z-axis. Blue spheres represent Ga or
In atoms, and yellow spheres represent As atoms.
(a) Zoomed view of a twin defect, showing
the change from ABC to
ACB stacking. (b) Cross-sectional view of the computational cell,
where a = b = 39.97 Å for GaAs
and 42.85 Å for InAs. (c) Segment of a TSL containing one full
period, L = 2δ, where δ is the separation
between adjacent twins. The red dashed lines indicate the position
of the twins, while the black dashed line shows the unit cell of the
zincblende, when the [111] crystal axis is taken to be parallel to
the cartesian z-axis. Blue spheres represent Ga or
In atoms, and yellow spheres represent As atoms.Twin boundaries are peculiar interfaces under many
respects and
defy the most common phenomenological approaches to the calculation
of the TBR, that is, the thermal resistance of an interface.[6−8] The popular acoustic mismatch model (AMM) computes the TBR in terms
of the mismatch of elastic properties of the constituent materials
forming an interface. The rationale behind it is that a phonon impinging
on the interface from one side is efficiently transmitted only if
a suitable vibrational state, in terms of energy and momentum, exists
on the other side. In a twin boundary, however, the materials on the
two sides of the interface are identical and the AMM predicts no TBR,
at odds with experimental results that have convincingly shown that
they do have an effect on phonon dispersion[35] and with theoretical atomistic simulations of phonon transport.[25,36] The diffuse mismatch model (DMM), on the other hand, returns the
same finite value of the TBR that it would erroneously attribute to
a homogeneous system without interface; this is a known shortcoming
of the DMM. If one considers a homogeneous system, without any physical
interface, and applies the recipe of the DMM across a fictitious boundary,
a finite TBR is obtained. Previous theoretical calculations, combining
molecular dynamics and Green’s functions, showed that the TBR
of twin boundaries in GaP and InP is determined by the rotation of
the phonon polarization vectors and by local structural distortion
at the interface.[36] This explains why simplified
models based on the mismatch of the elastic properties cannot capture
phonon scattering at twin boundaries and call for modeling approaches
that explicitly account for the atomic structure of the interface.
Other systems falling in this category include some kind of domain
walls in ferroelectrics[37,38] or inversional interfaces
in two-dimensional Janus monolayers, similar to those discussed in
a recent report.[39]
Computational Methods
We perform non-equilibrium molecular
dynamics (NEMD) simulations
with the LAMMPS code[40] and a Tersoff-type
interatomic potential[41] parameterized by
Nordlund and co-workers.[42] We consider
GaAs and InAs computational cells with the transport direction parallel
to the cubic [111] crystal axis, which we take to be the z coordinate direction. This choice is dictated by the fact that this
is the direction along which twin boundaries can be formed during
NW growth. The ends of the computational cell are connected to Nosé–Hoover
thermostats at temperatures TH and TC, while the rest of the system evolves according
to the microcanonical ensemble. We start from the 6-atom unit cell
of zincblende crystals, which has the [111] crystallographic direction
parallel to the z-axis, and construct 10 × 10
× M supercells. We take M =
90 for the study of isolated interfaces and M = 180
for systems featuring multiple interfaces, that is, a superlattice
segment. We apply periodic boundary conditions along the x- and y-axes. The TBR is calculated as ΔT/J, where ΔT is
the temperature jump at the interface and J is the
heat flux[6] (see refs (7), (43), and (44) for a more general discussion).After the simulation starts, a thermal gradient rapidly builds
up, but we nevertheless disregard the first 3 × 106 steps to allow a proper equilibration of the system. In all cases,
this time interval proved to be sufficient to reach the nonequilibrium
steady state. Indeed, after this equilibration interval, not only
the time evolution of the local temperature along z is roughly constant but also the rate of energy injected and extracted
by the hot and cold thermostats is the same, within numerical fluctuations.
After the steady state is reached, we average the heat flux and the
temperature overruns that go from 7.5 to 30 × 106 steps.
We apply a temperature difference TH – TC equal to 100 K, varying TC and TH in order to obtain
a different average temperature, TM. Notice
that below the Debye temperature, the use of classical dynamics, where
quantum effects are neglected, should be handled with care. Yet, attempts
at correcting for quantum features in low-temperature molecular dynamics
provided inconclusive and contrasting results.[45] We address the effect of this limitation in detail below.NEMD notoriously suffers from finite-size effects, and the usual
procedure to estimate the thermal conductivity of a material requires
running simulations in increasingly large cells. In this work, however,
our goal is either computing TBRs, which is much less sensitive to
cell sizes,[46] or studying the dependence
of the thermal resistance in multi-interface systems, where we compare
results obtained in cells of the same size.
Results and Discussion
Isolated Twin Boundary
As the first step of our study,
we have calculated the TBR as a function of the interface temperature
of a twin boundary in GaAs and InAs, as displayed in Figure . To this end, after reaching
the nonequilibrium steady state, we estimate the heat flux from the
energy per unit time injected/extracted by the hot/cold thermostats
and the thermal gradient from the averaged temperature profile, T(z); representative examples are provided
in the insets. The results obtained are similar to previous reports
of GaP and InP, showing that the physical effects are general and
do not qualitatively depend on the material or on the classical potential
used to describe interatomic interactions (Vashista potential for
phosphides,[47,48] Nordlund for arsenides[42]). In the case of GaAs, we add for comparison
a crystal phase interface between segments of zincblende and wurtzite
crystals (red diamonds in Figure ), which is also a class of important interfaces in
NW physics.[30,31] In agreement with the results
obtained with GaP and InP, we find a TBR of the order of 2 ×
10–10 K m2 W–1, smaller
than conventional heterointerfaces but slightly larger than the one
obtained for the corresponding twin boundary (black squares in Figure ). The continuous
lines are fits of the calculated data to T–3, the temperature dependence predicted by the same phenomenological
models that fail to account for the TBR[6] of twin boundaries. While this temperature dependence seems to be
reasonable for both the twin boundary and the crystal phase interface
in GaAs, in the case of InAs, we obtain a somewhat more abrupt saturation
to the high-temperature value, preventing a satisfactory fit to a T–3 decay, particularly at low temperatures.
Figure 2
TBR as
a function of temperature of a single twin boundary in GaAs
and InAs and of a crystal phase interface in GaAs. The continuous
lines are fits of the computed data to a T–3 dependence of the TBR. The inset shows the temperature profile, T(z), around a crystal phase interface
(top) and a twin boundary in GaAs (bottom). The temperature jump,
ΔT, which is the signature of the TBR and which
is used to compute it, is indicated.
TBR as
a function of temperature of a single twin boundary in GaAs
and InAs and of a crystal phase interface in GaAs. The continuous
lines are fits of the computed data to a T–3 dependence of the TBR. The inset shows the temperature profile, T(z), around a crystal phase interface
(top) and a twin boundary in GaAs (bottom). The temperature jump,
ΔT, which is the signature of the TBR and which
is used to compute it, is indicated.As mentioned above and discussed in detail in ref (36), the TBR of twin boundaries
derives from the rotation of the phonon polarization vectors. At variance
with conventional heterointerfaces, local atomic relaxations play
a minor role, as changes in bond lengths are typically of the order
of hundredths of Å and concern a very narrow region around the
interface, which is not expected to exhibit an appreciable strain.[49]
Increasing the Number of Twins
Now that we have established
that individual twin boundaries in arsenides behave similar to conventional
heterointerfaces, though with a smaller associated TBR, we move to
the study of multiple interfaces. Our goal is to assess to what extent
TSLs, periodic superstructures made of an ordered sequence of twins,
behave like conventional superlattices in altering phonon transport.
In a first set of computational experiments, we have considered an
increasing number of twin boundaries, 1 ≤ N ≤ 20, located in the central part of the computational cell.
The separation between neighboring twins, δ, is fixed, so that
the twinned region has a thickness equal to Nδ.
We take δ = 29.4 Å for GaAs and 31.5 Å for InAs, that
is, three unit cells along the [111] crystal axis. Notice that the
size of the computational cell along the transport direction has been
doubled with respect to the one used for the results of Figure . In this way, we guarantee
that the twinned region is sufficiently separated from the thermostats,
also for the largest values of N.We computed
ΔR = R – R0, where R and R0 are
the thermal resistances of a system with N and zero
twin boundaries. The thermal resistances are computed as I/ΔT, where I is the heat
current and ΔT is evaluated between the values
of the z coordinate axes, z and z, taken to be sufficiently far from the thermal reservoirs
to avoid the usual non-linearities of the temperature. We considered
two different values of the average temperature TM = (TH + TC)/2: a low-temperature case, with TM = 100 K, and a higher temperature TM = 300 and 250 K, for GaAs and InAs, respectively, which is
of the order of the Debye temperature of each material (TD = 360 K for GaAs and TD =
280 K for InAs).The results for GaAs and InAs at TM = 100 K are shown in Figure . If each twin boundary acted as an independent
scatterer
for phonons, ΔR should increase linearly and
its slope would be related to the TBR of an individual twin. The expected
dependence of ΔR in this limiting transport
regime is indicated with a dashed red line. However, the contribution
of the subsequent 2–4 twins to ΔR after
the first one is quite lower than the contribution of the single twin,
for both materials (see Figure ), an indication of the interaction between neighboring twins
for the chosen value of δ. Now, when more than 3–5 twins
are stacked together, a collective effect builds up and the slope
of ΔR is further reduced, indicating yet another
change in the transport regime. In order to establish in a quantitative
way for which value of N the slope changes, we have
carried out two linear fits of the computed ΔR in the intervals [1, N] and [N, 20], varying N, and plotted the mean residual
of squares. We found that the best fits are obtained for N = 3 and N = 5 for GaAs and InAs, respectively.
We also checked if the fit can be improved significantly by assuming
more than two linear regressions, but this was not the case. We interpret
this behavior in the following manner: when there are up to 3–5
twins, most phonons keep their coherence when traversing the region.
With a larger number of twins, a significant fraction of phonons with
high contribution to the heat flux start to scatter inside the “metamaterial”
region, changing the nature of transport and thus the slope of ΔR.
Figure 3
(Top) Thermal resistance as a function of the number of
twins in
GaAs and InAs, at low temperatures. ΔR is defined
as R – R0, where R and R0 are the thermal resistances
of a system with N and zero twin boundaries. (Bottom)
Mean of the residual squares of two linear fits of ΔR[1, N] and ΔR[N, 20] as a function of N (red triangles);
the individual residual squares of each fit is also shown (black squares
and blue diamonds). The mean has a minimum at N =
3 and N = 5 for GaAs and InAs, respectively. The
corresponding linear fits are shown in the upper panels with a dashed
line.
(Top) Thermal resistance as a function of the number of
twins in
GaAs and InAs, at low temperatures. ΔR is defined
as R – R0, where R and R0 are the thermal resistances
of a system with N and zero twin boundaries. (Bottom)
Mean of the residual squares of two linear fits of ΔR[1, N] and ΔR[N, 20] as a function of N (red triangles);
the individual residual squares of each fit is also shown (black squares
and blue diamonds). The mean has a minimum at N =
3 and N = 5 for GaAs and InAs, respectively. The
corresponding linear fits are shown in the upper panels with a dashed
line.In the higher temperature case, where TM = 250 or 300 K, such a distinction between two transport
regimes
is more difficult to make. While by visual inspection it seems that
for both materials the slope changes at N ∼
3, no clear minima of the mean of the residual squares emerge (see Figure ). On the other hand,
the oscillations of ΔR with N are indicative that substantial interference effects persist, and
indeed, also in this case, ΔR is systematically
lower than the independent scatterers regime (red dashed line in Figure ). Yet, these effects
are hardly visible in our lower temperature results, suggesting that
further investigation is needed to reveal the nature of these oscillations.
Figure 4
(Top)
Thermal resistance as a function of the number of twins in
GaAs and InAs, at room temperature. ΔR is defined
as R – R0, where R and R0 are the thermal resistances
of a system with N and zero twin boundaries. (Bottom)
Mean of the residual squares of two linear fits of ΔR[0, N] and ΔR[N, 20] as a function of N (red triangles);
the individual residual squares of each fit is also shown (black squares
and blue diamonds). No clear minima emerge.
(Top)
Thermal resistance as a function of the number of twins in
GaAs and InAs, at room temperature. ΔR is defined
as R – R0, where R and R0 are the thermal resistances
of a system with N and zero twin boundaries. (Bottom)
Mean of the residual squares of two linear fits of ΔR[0, N] and ΔR[N, 20] as a function of N (red triangles);
the individual residual squares of each fit is also shown (black squares
and blue diamonds). No clear minima emerge.We recall here that at low temperatures, the results
obtained from
classical molecular dynamics cannot be taken quantitatively. Assuming
that atoms move according to Newton’s laws implies that phonon
population follows Maxwell–Boltzmann, rather than Bose–Einstein,
statistics, and this is a good approximation only at sufficiently
high temperatures. Simplified schemes to correct for these effects
include a temperature renormalization[50−53] (the results obtained at a nominal
temperature TMD are actually valid at
a different temperature, TQ) or using
quantum, rather than classical, specific heat, when it is required
for the calculation of thermal conductivity.[54,55] However, even within the more general discussion of Berens et al.,[56] the result of properly accounting for quantum
effects is a temperature-dependent correction of the thermodynamic
variables calculated. The results of Figure , however, have all been obtained at the
same temperature, and thus, any small correction to the computed values
would affect in a similar way all data points. Also, it should be
kept in mind that we are not concerned here with the specific values
of ΔR but rather with highlighting different
transport regimes. In this sense, our results are reliable and provide
a valuable insight into the underlying physics.
Temperature Profiles
The spatial dependence of the
temperature along the transport direction is essential in NEMD not
only to estimate the TBR but also to compute the thermal conductivity
of a homogeneous system. Indeed, even when the temperature of the
reservoirs is fixed, one must rely on the thermal gradient of a central
region of the simulation cell, rather than on the nominal thermal
bias, TH – TC. Additionally, T(z) conveys
an important physical insight in the presence of interfaces. In Figure , we plot T(z) for a GaAs system with 1, 5, 10, 15,
and 20 twin boundaries at TM = 100 K.
The case with one single twin resembles the temperature profile shown
in the inset of Figure , although here, results have been obtained in a larger computational
cell. The temperature discontinuity is small but clearly observable,
and it occurs exactly where the twin boundary is located. Next, we
consider the case of five twin boundaries. Although it is not possible
to observe the signature of the five interfaces, it is clear that
within the twinned region, T(z)
still exhibits a certain structure (see the zoomed view in the inset).
In the rest of the cases displayed here (N > 5),
on the other hand, the twinned regions behave at all effects as a
metamaterial with its own thermal resistance. Phonons experience a
TBR between pure GaAs segments and a central TSL segment. Remarkably,
the TBRs to enter/exit the TSL region are, though small, clearly visible
and similar in all the cases. Conversely, within the twinned region, T(z) is linear, as expected in a homogeneous
material (see the inset for N = 10).
Figure 5
Temperature profile, T(z), for
a GaAs system with N = 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 twins
with a constant intertwin separation, δ, and with TM = 100 K. The red dashed lines indicate the position
of the first and last twin boundaries (i.e., the thickness of the
twinned region). The coordinates, z and z, used
to evaluate ΔT to yield ΔR in Figure are marked
by the red dashed lines. Inset displays a zoomed view of T(z) of the twinned region.
Temperature profile, T(z), for
a GaAs system with N = 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 twins
with a constant intertwin separation, δ, and with TM = 100 K. The red dashed lines indicate the position
of the first and last twin boundaries (i.e., the thickness of the
twinned region). The coordinates, z and z, used
to evaluate ΔT to yield ΔR in Figure are marked
by the red dashed lines. Inset displays a zoomed view of T(z) of the twinned region.The analysis of Figure helps rationalize the dependence of ΔR presented above. Once the twinned region is seen by the
propagating
phonons as a segment of TSL with its own resistivity, ρTSL, the total resistance is simplywhere L = z – z is the total length probed, A is the cross section, and ρGaAs is the
temperature-dependent thermal resistivity of GaAs; the initial and
final coordinates of the TSL segment are and . If, for simplicity, we drop the temperature
dependence of ρTSL and ρGaAs, the
resistance simply reads R = NδρTSL/A + (L – Nδ)ρGaAs/A. Therefore, if we look back at Figure , we can distinguish two transport regimes:
at first, ΔR increases because the number of
twin interfaces increases; next, it increases because the length of
the more resistive TSL segment increases, and thus, its relative weight
on the total resistance, R, is higher. In the first
case, phonons see the twin boundaries as interfering scatterers, and
the increase of ΔR is dictated by the complex
interplay of the individual twins; in the second case, the twinned
region reaches sufficient thickness to be seen as a TSL metamaterial
with its own conductivity, which depends on the superlattice design
parameters, for example, the period.These considerations suggest
that a different balance between the
TBR of the individual interface and the resistivity of the ideal superlattice,
that is, with a very large N, could result in a different
dependence of ΔR on the number of twins. In
particular, if the TSL was considerably less resistive than the pure
untwinned systems, after the collective interface behavior shows up,
it should first hit a maximum and then decrease.Finally, we
observe that plots of T(z) in Figure indicate
that non-linear effects deriving from the use of a finite thermal
bias appear to be negligible.
Increasing the Density of Twins
Finally, in order to
further corroborate our conclusions, we report the results obtained
in a different kind of computational experiments. Now, rather than
varying the number of twins and fixing their separation, we do the
opposite: we consider a fixed number of six twin boundaries and vary
gradually the separation between neighboring interfaces. If the transport
regime was fully incoherent and each interface scattered phonons independently
from the others, the total thermal resistance should be constant,
as all the systems contain the same number of twin boundaries. Our
results for GaAs are displayed in Figure and capture a rather different situation.
While for large separations (δ > 60 Å), the additional
resistance introduced by the twin boundaries is almost constant, when
they are brought together, it decreases, a clear indication that ΔR does not simply result from the sum of independent scattering
events. It is interesting that here the trend is quite clear also
for a room temperature case, while such an observation was not fully
conclusive when we varied the number of twin defects (see Figure ).
Figure 6
Thermal resistance as
a function of the intertwin separation, δ,
for a GaAs system with 6 twin boundaries and for (top) TM = 300 K and (bottom) 100 K.
Thermal resistance as
a function of the intertwin separation, δ,
for a GaAs system with 6 twin boundaries and for (top) TM = 300 K and (bottom) 100 K.Notice that the twin configurations studied thus
far prevented
us to compute the thermal conductivity, κ, which is ill-defined
in nonhomogeneous materials. Therefore, we performed an additional
set of calculations, considering systems where the periodic sequence
of twin defects spans the whole NW length, so that the thermal conductivity
of the TSL (that now occupies the entire NW) can be defined and calculated.
In this case, the TSL morphology and properties are fully defined
by the twin periodicity, that is, twice the separation between neighboring
twins (see the sketch in Figure ). As the length is kept constant, to have the same
finite-size effects, changing the periodicity results in a different
number of twin interfaces. Our results at room temperature are displayed
in Figure . As it
can be seen there, when the period L = 2δ decreases,
the thermal conductivity decreases, because the number of twins increases.
However, this initial abrupt decrease at first slows down (at N ∼ 50) and then saturates. Indeed, when doubling
the overall number of interfaces in short period TSLs (N going from 100 to 200), κ does not change (as a matter of
fact, it even slightly increases, from 29.9 to 30 W m–1 K–1).
Figure 7
Thermal conductivity of a GaAs TSL at room temperature
as a function
of the number of twins (lower axis) and the separation between adjacent
twins, δ (upper axis). The period of the TSL is L = 2δ.
Thermal conductivity of a GaAs TSL at room temperature
as a function
of the number of twins (lower axis) and the separation between adjacent
twins, δ (upper axis). The period of the TSL is L = 2δ.It is interesting to compare these results with
those recently
reported by Ghukasyan and LaPierre.[57] They
studied fully twinned GaAs TSL, like those we considered in Figure , though they explicitly
accounted for the NW geometry, studying systems with diameters of
at most 10 nm. They observe a deep and well-defined minimum at small
periods, while we see a saturation. This suggests that the sawtooth
faceting that naturally arises in this kind of nanostructures[32] plays an important role in the observation of
this behavior and thus in highlighting the incoherent-to-coherent
transport crossover. This observation agrees with the results of Xiong
et al.,[58] who studied Si NW TSL and reported
a minimum in the thermal conductivity only when the axial zigzag structure
was considered (indeed, they rationalize their results on the basis
of geometric arguments). Notice that Ghukasyan and LaPierre report
a minimum at a period of approximately 50 Å, while in our calculations,
κ saturates at δ = 19.6 Å, which corresponds to a
period L ∼ 40 Å (Figure ). This agreement indeed indicates that the
underlying physics is the same in both cases, though we expect our
results to be a better approximation for large diameter NWs, similar
to those that are routinely grown experimentally.[27,59−61]
Conclusions
In summary, we have carried out computational
experiments based
on nonequilibrium molecular dynamics and provided clear fingerprints
of the fact that TSLs behave similarly to their conventional counterparts,
where segments of different materials repeat periodically. Namely,
we have shown that (i) isolated twin defects have a small but finite
TBR; (ii) when a sufficiently high number of twin defects are stacked
close to each other, phonons see the twinned region as a homogeneous
(meta)material; (iii) the way a given number of twin defects scatter
phonons depends on their density, indicating the so-called particle-to-wave
crossover. These observations corroborate recent experimental reports[35] and indicate that crystal-phase engineering
can become an effective way to design materials with desired phononic
properties and to manipulate phonons similar to conventional superlattices,
but with additional advantages, such as defect-free and atomically
abrupt interfaces.
Authors: Marta De Luca; Claudia Fasolato; Marcel A Verheijen; Yizhen Ren; Milo Y Swinkels; Sebastian Kölling; Erik P A M Bakkers; Riccardo Rurali; Xavier Cartoixà; Ilaria Zardo Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 11.189