High expression of ceramide synthase 5 predicts a poor prognosis in gastric cancer.

Background: Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Ceramide synthase 5 (CerS5) is a member of the CerS family. Emerging evidence has shown that overexpressed CerS5 is correlated with the poor prognosis of cancer patients. However, the role of CerS5 in gastric cancer remains unclear. The aim of this study is to delineate the relevance of CerS5 levels to gastric cancer.
Methods: The expression level of CerS5 was determined by immunohistochemistry, and the survival data of gastric cancer patients were obtained by regular follow-up. The gene expression profile of CerS5 and corresponding clinical features of gastric cancer patients from public databases were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG). The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to determine the correlation between CerS5 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine the independent prognostic factors of patients with gastric cancer.
Results: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining indicated that CerS5 is overexpressed in gastric cancer tissues and metastatic lymph nodes. The levels of CerS5 were correlated with tumor location and carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50). Moreover, the increased CerS5 levels were significantly correlated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients from the ACRG and our institute, but not TCGA, suggesting that CerS5 is probably a prognosis marker of gastric cancer for the Asian population. Finally, univariate and multivariate analyses showed that high expression of CerS5 is an independent factor of poor prognosis for gastric cancer patients. Conclusions: CerS5 is universally overexpressed in gastric cancer tissues and is an independent factor of poor prognosis for gastric cancer patients. 2022 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. The global incidence rate and mortality rate are 5th and 4th, respectively. In 2020, more than one million new cases of gastric cancer were diagnosed globally (1). The prognosis of gastric cancer is poor and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate is only 35.1% (2). Surgical resection is the main method for the treatment of gastric cancer (3). In recent years, increasing strategies were applied for the treatments of gastric cancer, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and so on (4,5). However, comprehensive treatments for gastric cancer have not improved the OS rates significantly, due to toxicity, side effects, and drug resistance (6). At present, the early screening and diagnosis of gastric cancer mainly rely on imaging, tumor biomarkers, endoscopy, and tissue biopsy (7). Pathological diagnosis by endoscopic biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of gastric cancer, however, it is not widely used for early cancer screening due to its invasive prosperity. Therefore, it is of great importance to search for biomarkers for early diagnosis or targeted treatment for gastric cancer.

Ceramide synthases (CerS) are enzymes that are essential for the de-novo synthesis of ceramides and other sphingolipids. Six types of CerS (CerS1–CerS6) have been found in mammals (8,9). Different ceramides have fatty acyl-coenzyme A with different chain lengths, which implies that they might be involved in the regulation of sphingomyelin metabolism in different types of tissues (10). Ceramides are not only required for the structural components of cellular membranes, but also the signal molecules that trigger cell death and tumor suppression (11,12). Many studies have confirmed that CerS plays an important role in the development of human cancers, such as colon cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and so on (13-15).

Ceramide synthase 5 (CerS5), as a member of the CerS family, has been confirmed to be involved in the regulation of the occurrence and development of several types of human cancers. For example, the mRNA expression levels of CerS5 were shown to be upregulated in cancer tissues of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) (16). The increased CerS5 expression is negatively correlated with the poor prognosis of CRC patients (17). Jiang et al. reported that the levels of CerS5 mRNA and protein in human neuroglioma tissues were significantly higher than those in normal nervous ganglion tissues (18). And the overexpression of CerS5 has been reported to trigger cellular apoptosis via the promotion of ceramide up-regulation following hypoxia or reoxygenation (19). On the contrary, the knockdown of CerS5 by using CerS5-specific shRNA inhibited autophagy and increased the drug sensitivity of HCT116 cells to chemotherapeutics, such as oxaliplatin and 5-FU (20). However, the relevance of CerS5 to gastric cancer is remaining to be addressed.

In this study, we included gastric cancer patients both from our institute and online databases and determined the correlation of CerS5 levels with clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer patients from different populations. We aimed to elucidate the differential expression of CerS5 in gastric cancer patients, and uncover the role of CerS5 in the prediction of the prognosis of gastric cancer. We present the following article in accordance with the REMARK reporting checklist (available at https://tcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tcr-22-1348/rc).

Methods

Patients

This study included 150 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy in the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (ZJCH) from January 2013 to December 2017. Inclusion criteria: (I) gastric cancer was definitely diagnosed by postoperative pathology; (II) the patient’s medical records are relatively complete; (III) no comprehensive anti-tumor treatments such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy were performed before operation; (IV) OS follow-up data were complete. Exclusion criteria: (I) patients with any other types of malignant tumors; (II) patients with metastasis from other malignant tumors. We retrospectively collected the medical record data of these patients, including demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, and obtained the OS via telephone follow-up. The final follow-up time was August 2021. OS was defined as the duration from initial surgery to death or the last follow-up.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by institutional ethics committee board of the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (IRB-2021-431) and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

The tissue samples were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. After careful selection by two independent pathologists, representative gastric cancer tissues, paracancerous tissues, and metastatic lymph nodes were collected to construct tissue microarray and subjected to IHC staining. The slices were incubated at 56–60 ℃ for 15 min, performed two changes of xylene, rehydrated with ethanol, 90% ethanol, 80% ethanol, rinsed in gently running tap water, and washed with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Subsequently, the slices were incubated three times with water in a microwave oven for 5 min, cooled slowly at room temperature, incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min, blocked with primary antibody (anti-CerS5 1:500) at 4 ℃ overnight, washed with 1×PBS three times for 5 min, blocked with secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L, 1:1,000) at room temperature for 30 min, washed with 1×PBS three times for 5 min. Then, the rabbit-specific HRP/DAB (ABC) Detection IHC Kit (Abcam, ab64261) was used for the detection of DAB, and the nucleus was stained with hematoxylin. Finally, the tissue microarray was dehydrated and sealed with neutral gel.

Evaluation of CerS5 staining

The results of the immunohistochemistry assay were interpreted by two senior pathologists. The expression intensity of CerS5 was evaluated by the H-score system. The formula of the H scoring system is as follows: H score = (∑ IS × AP). IS value represents the staining intensity. No staining is 0 points, weak staining is 1 point, and moderate staining is 2 points. AP value represents the percentage of positive staining cells. 0% is 0 points, 1–25% is 1 point, 26–50% is 2 points, 51–75% is 3 points, 76–100% is 4 points. The median H-score of CerS5 is 4 points, which was set as the cut-off value, and the patients with different levels of CerS5 were divided into a high expression group and a low expression group.

The public tumor databases

RNA-seq data of patients with gastric cancer were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) (21) databases, including 405 cases from TCGA and 246 cases from ACRG. We compared CerS5 levels in gastric cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues. According to the corresponding clinicopathological information, the relevance of CerS5 levels to the survival time of gastric cancer patients was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Chi-square test, corrected Chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the correlation between the expression level of CerS5 and clinicopathological features. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curve. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze the independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI were calculated. P<0.05 represents statistical significance.

Results

Clinicopathological features of 150 gastric cancer patients

The median age of gastric cancer patients included in the study was 61 years old, including 106 males (70.7%) and 44 females (29.3%). In terms of tumor location and distribution, patients with distal gastric cancer were the majority, accounting for 61.3%. In terms of TNM stages, the majority of patients in the study were stage III, accounting for 78.7%, and stage II and IV patients accounted for 12.0% and 9.3%, respectively. Among the 150 patients, pathology analysis showed that the degree of differentiation was mainly low differentiation and median-low differentiation, accounting for 44% and 34.7%, respectively. All patients were followed up regularly. The last follow-up time was August 2021. During the follow-up period, 81 patients died. More specific clinicopathological features were shown at https://cdn.amegroups.cn/static/public/tcr-22-1348-1.xlsx and in Table S1.

CerS5 levels increased in tumor tissues of gastric cancer patients

By using immunohistochemistry, we found that CerS5 is expressed in 118 of 150 patients with gastric cancer, accounting for 78.7%, and 32 of 150 patients with negative CerS5 staining account for 21.3% ( and Table S2). According to the H-score evaluation standard, the median H-score of CerS5 is 4 points, which was set as the cut-off value. The patients with H-score ≤4 points were categorized as the CerS5 low expression group, and the patients with H-score >4 points were categorized as the CerS5 high expression group. High levels of CerS5 exist in the tumor tissues of 50/150 (33.3%) patients, while only in paracancerous tissues of 24/150 (16.0%) patients ( and Table S3). These data indicated that the levels of CerS5 in tumor tissues are significantly higher than those in paracancerous tissues of gastric cancer patients.

Figure 1

IHC staining of CerS5 in tumor tissues, paracancerous tissues, and metastatic lymph nodes tissues of gastric cancer patients (×200). IHC, immunohistochemistry; CerS5, ceramide synthase 5.

Figure 2

CerS5 levels increased in tumor tissues and metastatic lymph nodes tissues of gastric cancer patients. (A) the expression level of CerS5 in tumor tissues and paracancerous tissues of gastric cancer patients from ZJCH. (B,C) The mRNA expression level of CerS5 in normal tissues and tumor tissues of gastric cancer patients from TCGA and ACRG. (D) The expression level of CerS5 in paracancerous tissues, tumor tissues, and metastatic lymph nodes tissues of gastric cancer patients from ZJCH. Significance was determined by using a two tailed Student’s t-test. CerS5, ceramide synthase 5; ZJCH, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group.

To investigate the role of CerS5 in gastric cancer patients from different populations, we downloaded the RNA-seq data of CerS5 from TCGA and ACRG databases (Table S4, https://cdn.amegroups.cn/static/public/tcr-22-1348-2.xls, https://cdn.amegroups.cn/static/public/tcr-22-1348-3.xls). In terms of proportion and clinical characteristics, TCGA is mainly based on the European population, while ACRG is based on the Asian population. We collected 373 tumor tissues and 32 normal tissues from TCGA, and collected 122 tumor tissues and 123 normal tissues from ACRG, respectively. The results showed that CerS5 is overexpressed in cancer tissues compared to normal tissues in both TCGA and ACRG (), implying that CerS5 is universally upregulated in gastric cancer patients, regardless of the populations.

CerS5 levels increased in metastatic lymph nodes of gastric cancer patients

To test if the expression level of CerS5 varies between cancer tissue and corresponding metastatic lymph node tissue, the pairs of tissues from the same patient were collected and subjected to IHC staining. We found that perigastric lymph node metastasis exists in 99/150 gastric cancer patients, indicating that the metastasis rate is around 66.0%. Moreover, 29 cases of 99 patients (29.3%) with perigastric lymph node metastasis had high expression of CerS5, and 70 cases (70.7%) had low expression of CerS5. Among the paired 99 gastric cancer tissue samples, 38 cases had high expression of CerS5 (38.4%), and 61 cases (61.6%) had low expression of CerS5. Nevertheless, in the paired 99 paracancerous tissue samples, 14 cases had high expression of CerS5 (14.1%), and 85 cases (85.9%) had low expression of CerS5 (). The results showed that the expression of CerS5 in metastatic lymph node tissues is significantly higher than that in paired paracancerous tissues (P=0.01), while there is no significant differential expression of CerS5 between gastric cancer tissues and metastatic lymph node tissues (P=0.176). These data suggested that CerS5 is overexpressed in both cancer tissues and metastatic lymph nodes tissues, compared with paracancerous tissues of gastric cancer patients ().

Table 1

The expression level of CerS5 in tumor tissues, paracancerous tissues and metastatic lymph nodes tissues

Parameters	N	CerS5 expression		Positive rate	χ2	P value
		High	Low
Tumor	99	38	61	38.4%	15.022	<0.001**
Paracancerous tissue	99	14	85	14.1%
Lymph nodes	99	29	70	29.3%	6.684	0.010*
Paracancerous tissue	99	14	85	14.1%
Tumor	99	38	61	38.4%	1.827	0.176
Lymph nodes	99	29	70	29.3%

*, P<0.05; **, P<0.001.

The relevance of CerS5 levels to clinicopathological features in gastric cancer

To investigate the relevance of CerS5 to clinicopathological features of gastric cancer, the retrospective clinicopathological data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis by using several statistical methods, including Chi-Square Test, corrected Chi-Square Test, and Fishers’ Exact Test. As shown in , the main tumor locations of gastric cancer patients with low levels of CerS5 were distal gastric cancer (66/96, 68.8%), however, the main tumor locations of patients with high levels of CerS5 were proximal (23/54, 42.6%) and distal (26/54, 48.1%) gastric cancer. The correlation of CerS5 levels with tumor location is of statistical significance (P=0.045), suggesting that CerS5 is involved in the distribution of gastric cancer.

Table 2

The Correlation of CerS5 with clinicopathological characteristics in gastric cancer

Parameters	CerS5 expression		Total	χ2	P value
	Low	High
Age (year)
≤61	53	24	77	1.603	0.206
>61	43	30	73
Gender
Male	68	38	106	0.004	0.952
Female	28	16	44
Family history (GC)
No	84	43	127	1.649	0.199
Yes	12	11	23
Smoking history
No	59	38	97	1.201	0.273
Yes	37	16	53
Drinking history
No	72	41	113	0.016	0.900
Yes	24	13	37
Weight loss
No	60	36	96	0.260	0.610
Yes	36	18	54
Tumor location
Proximal	25	23	48	6.201	0.045*
Distal	66	26	92
Total	5	5	10
Lauren classification
Intestinal	49	24	73	0.706	0.703
Diffuse	31	20	51
Mixed	15	10	25
Unknown	1	0	1
Tumor size (cm)
<5	31	15	46	0.345	0.557
≥5	63	38	101
Unknown	2	1	3
Grade of differentiation
Poor	43	23	66	0.529	0.768
Moderate-poor	34	18	52
Moderate	15	11	26
T stage
T1/2	6	0	6	2.076	0.150
T3/4	90	54	144
N stage
N0/1	31	13	44	1.126	0.289
N2/3	65	41	106
M stage
M0	90	46	136	2.996	0.083
M1	6	8	14
TNM stage
II	15	3	18	5.646	0.059
III	75	43	118
IV	6	8	14
Nerve invasion
No	28	12	40	0.852	0.356
Yes	68	42	110
Vascular tumor thrombus
No	39	17	56	1.235	0.266
Yes	57	37	94
AFP (ng/mL)
≤8.1	89	51	140	0.077	0.782
>8.1	6	2	8
Unknown	1	1	2
CEA (ng/mL)
≤5	75	37	112	1.686	0.194
>5	21	17	38
CA19-9 (U/mL)
≤37	70	33	103	2.239	0.135
>37	26	21	47
CA72-4 (U/mL)
≤6.9	70	35	105	1.453	0.228
>6.9	17	14	31
Unknown	8	6	14
CA125 (U/mL)
≤35	91	46	137	2.907	0.088
>35	5	8	13
CA50 (U/mL)
≤25	52	24	76	6.495	0.011*
>25	6	11	17
Unknown	38	19	57

*, P<0.05. CerS5, ceramide synthase 5; GC, gastric cancer; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CA72-4, carbohydrate antigen 72-4; CA125, carbohydrate antigen 125; CA50, carbohydrate antigen 50.

In addition, we found that the high positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 50 in gastric cancer patients with high expression of CerS5 is 20.4% (11/54), and the high positive rate of CA50 in patients with low expression of CerS5 is only 6.3% (6/96) (, P=0.011). CA50, a non-specific broad-spectrum tumor marker, is mainly used for the auxiliary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, CRC, and gastric cancer (22,23). These data showed that the expression level of CerS5 is positively correlated with the positive rate of CA50, suggesting that CerS5 is probably important for the auxiliary diagnosis of gastric cancer. Nevertheless, other indicators, such as age, gender, smoking history, drinking history, family history, TNM stage, Lauren classification, tumor size, tumor differentiation, CA125, and other common gastrointestinal tumor markers had no significant correlation with the expression level of CerS5 in gastric cancer.

The relevance of CerS5 to the prognosis of gastric cancer patients

To address the relevance of CerS5 levels to the prognosis of gastric cancer patients, we followed up 150 gastric cancer patients regularly to obtain survival data and used the Kaplan-Meier method to draw the survival curves. As shown in , the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with high expression levels of CerS5 was significantly worse than the low expression group. The 5-year survival rate of the low expression group was 52.8%, while the rate of the high expression group was only 32.8%. These results suggested that the expression level of CerS5 is negatively correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

Figure 3

The relevance of CerS5 to the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. (A) OS rates of gastric cancer patients with low expression of CerS5 and high expression of CerS5. (B,C) Survival probability of gastric cancer patients with differential CerS5 levels from TCGA (B) and ACRG (C) databases. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the OS rates of patients. Significance was determined by using a two tailed Student’s t-test. CerS5, ceramide synthase 5; OS, overall survival; ZJCH, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group.

In order to verify the relevance of CerS5 to the prognosis of gastric cancer in a larger cohort, we collected 399 samples of gastric cancer patients from TCGA, and divided them into two different groups, the high expression group, and the low expression group, in terms of the levels of CerS5 (https://cdn.amegroups.cn/static/public/tcr-22-1348-2.xls). As shown in , CerS5 levels had no significant correlation with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients from TCGA.

Since TCGA is mainly based on the European population, we then collected the survival data of gastric cancer patients from ACRG, which is based on the Asian population, to further investigate the role of CerS5 in different populations. The samples of 300 gastric cancer patients and the corresponding survival data from ACRG (GSE66229, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The results showed that the patients with high expression levels of CerS5 from the GSE66229 dataset had a worse prognosis than those with low expression levels of CerS5 (https://cdn.amegroups.cn/static/public/tcr-22-1348-3.xls, P=0.00717), suggesting that the expression level of CerS5 is significantly negatively correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients in the Asian population ().

To address the correlation of CerS5 levels and clinicopathological features with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients, we used the univariate Cox regression method to analyze all the clinicopathological markers included in this study. As shown in , the expression level of CerS5 (P=0.023), family history of gastric cancer (P=0.008), Lauren classification (P=0.015), N stage (P<0.001), M stage (P<0.001), TNM stage (P=0.001) and vascular tumor thrombus (P=0.001), CEA (P=0.005), and CA125 (P<0.001) were correlated factors affecting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Subsequently, the factors with an index of P<0.1 by using univariate Cox regression analysis were subjected to multivariate Cox regression analysis. As shown in , CerS5 expression (P=0.046), Lauren classification (P=0.022), N stage (P=0.010), M stage (P=0.023), and CA125 (P=0.001) were independent factors, which are able to affect the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

Table 3

Univariate Cox regression analysis of 150 gastric cancer patients

Parameters	Univariate Cox regression analysis
	B value	P value	HR (95% CI)
Gender
Female vs. male	0.047	0.847	1.049 (0.647, 1.700)
Age (year)
≤61 vs. >61	0.054	0.808	1.056 (0.682, 1.633)
CerS5 expression
Low vs. high	0.513	0.023*	1.671 (1.075, 2.596)
Family history (GC)
No vs. yes	0.731	0.008*	2.076 (1.212, 3.558)
Smoking history
No vs. yes	0.140	0.544	1.150 (0.732, 1.807)
Drinking history
No vs. yes	0.204	0.415	1.226 (0.751, 2.001)
Weight loss
No vs. yes	0.271	0.231	1.312 (0.842, 2.044)
Tumor location
Proximal vs. distal vs. total	0.151	0.468	1.163 (0.774, 1.747)
Lauren classification
Intestinal vs. diffuse vs. mixed	0.354	0.015*	1.425 (1.070, 1.897)
Tumor size (cm)
≤5 vs. >5	0.481	0.063	1.618 (0.974, 2.688)
Grade of differentiation
Poor vs. moderate-poor vs. moderate	0.116	0.448	0.890 (0.659, 1.203)
T stage
T1, T2 vs. T3, T4	1.640	0.103	5.155 (0.716, 37.105)
N stage
N0, N1 vs. N2, N3	1.120	<0.001**	3.066 (1.659, 5.664)
M stage
M0 vs. M1	1.290	<0.001**	3.633 (1.979, 6.668)
TNM stage
II vs. III vs. IV	0.927	0.001*	2.527 (1.496, 4.268)
Nerve invasion
No vs. yes	0.511	0.068	1.667 (0.964, 2.884)
Vascular tumor thrombus
No vs. yes	0.865	0.001**	2.374 (1.431, 3.938)
AFP (ng/mL)
≤8.1 vs. >8.1	0.160	0.707	1.173 (0.510, 2.697)
CEA (ng/mL)
≤5 vs. >5	0.667	0.005*	1.948 (1.223, 3.104)
CA19-9 (U/mL)
≤37 vs. >37	0.443	0.054	1.558 (0.992, 2.446)
CA72-4 (U/mL)
≤6.9 vs. >6.9	0.060	0.833	0.942 (0.542, 1.637)
CA125 (U/mL)
≤35 vs. >35	1.403	<0.001**	4.068 (2.181, 7.586)
CA50 (U/mL)
≤25 vs. >25	0.625	0.071	1.867 (0.949, 3.674)

*, P<0.05; **, P<0.001. GC, gastric cancer; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CA72-4, carbohydrate antigen 72-4; CA125, carbohydrate antigen 125; CA50, carbohydrate antigen 50.

Table 4

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of 150 gastric cancer patients

Parameters	Multivariate Cox regression analysis
	B value	P value	HR (95% CI)
CerS5 expression
Low vs. high	0.667	0.046*	1.948 (1.010, 3.754)
Family history (GC)
No vs. yes	0.226	0.572	1.254 (0.572,2.748)
Lauren classification
Intestinal vs. diffuse vs. mixed	0.573	0.022*	1.774 (1.087, 2.893)
Tumor size (cm)
≤5 vs. >5	0.239	0.524	1.270 (0.609, 2.650)
N stage
N0, N1 vs. N2, N3	1.433	0.010*	4.190 (1.412, 12.435)
M stage
M0 vs. M1	1.936	0.023*	6.932 (1.312, 36.633)
TNM stage
II vs. III vs. IV	0.519	0.431	0.595 (0.164, 2.165)
Nerve invasion
No vs. yes	0.497	0.200	0.609 (0.285, 1.300)
Vascular tumor thrombus
No vs. yes	0.442	0.250	1.555 (0.733, 3.301)
CEA (ng/mL)
≤5 vs. >5	0.879	0.057	2.407 (0.976, 5.939)
CA19-9 (U/mL)
≤37 vs. >37	0.509	0.334	0.601 (0.214, 1.687)
CA125 (U/mL)
≤35 vs. >35	1.786	0.001*	5.964 (2.058, 17.279)
CA50 (U/mL)
≤25 vs. >25	0.177	0.769	0.838 (0.257, 2.731)

*, P<0.05. GC, gastric cancer; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CA125, carbohydrate antigen 125; CA50, carbohydrate antigen 50.

Discussion

Gastric cancer is one of the most common human cancers worldwide, with low early diagnosis rates, poor outcomes of combined treatment, and low median OS rates (24). Most gastric cancer patients were diagnosed in the advanced stages, and around 1/3 of them had missed the opportunities for surgical treatment at the first diagnosis. Hence, the exploration of new strategies for diagnosis and treatment is the main way to achieve the improvement of therapeutic outcomes for gastric cancer patients. Emerging evidence has shown that gene mutations, epigenetic alterations, and signaling pathway disorders are closely related to the occurrence and development of gastric cancer (25-27). Several molecules or signaling pathways, which are of abnormal activation, have been found to be potential therapeutic targets for gastric cancer. Some of these newly discovered therapeutic targets were developed for disease screening, and some of them have achieved remarkable therapeutic effects in clinical trials (28,29). However, more effective strategies for early diagnosis and treatment for gastric cancer patients are remaining to be further explored.

CerS belong to a family composed of six mammalian enzymes, which was found in 2002 (30). Each enzyme has unique characteristics and generates ceramide with specific fatty acids, which are involved in a series of biological behaviors, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and autophagy (12,31-33). Many studies have shown that CerS play essential roles in the development of human cancers. Different subtypes of CerS have diverse functions in different kinds of tumors. Mojakgomo et al. found that Cers4 and CerS5 mRNA levels were overexpressed in endometrial cancer (EC) and CRC, while their expression levels decreased in response to apoptosis (34). Schiffmann et al. compared the concentrations of endogenous ceramide in biopsy tissues by using liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), including 43 cases of malignant breast cancers and 21 cases of benign breast tumors, and found that the level of total ceramide averaged 12-fold and 4-fold higher than normal breast tissue samples, for malignant and benign tumors, respectively (35). Moreover, compared with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients, the expression levels of CerS4 and CerS6 mRNA in estrogen receptor-positive patients were significantly upregulated, revealing the possibility that the levels of CerS were modulated in an estrogen-dependent manner in breast cancer (36). However, the mechanism of how altered ceramide levels affected the development of breast cancer is remaining to be uncovered.

In this study, CerS5 levels of 150 gastric cancer patients from our institute were determined by using immunohistochemistry. Compared with paracancerous tissues, CerS5 was upregulated in gastric cancer tissues. Moreover, the expression level of CerS5 in metastatic lymph nodes from 99 gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastasis was determined, and no significant differential expression level of CerS5 occurred between cancer tissues and metastatic lymph nodes (P=0.176). These data showed that CerS5 is upregulated in both cancer tissue and metastatic lymph node of gastric cancer patients. Furthermore, we collected RNA-seq data of gastric cancer patients from public databases, TCGA, and ACRG, and also found that CerS5 is highly expressed in gastric cancer patients from different populations. Therefore, CerS5 is universally overexpressed in cancer tissues of patients with gastric cancer.

Emerging evidence showed that the correlation of CerS with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients exists in different types of human cancers. Fitzgerald et al. found that the high expression of CerS5 in tumor tissues was significantly correlated with the poor prognosis of patients with CRC (17). Moro and colleagues carried out a clinical study on the metabolism of ceramide in breast cancer, and found that ceramide levels in breast cancer tissues were significantly higher than those in normal breast tissues and adjacent tissues. The prognosis of breast cancer patients with high levels of ceramide was significantly worse than those with low ceramide levels (37). On the other hand, CerS2, CerS3, CerS4, and CerS5 were overexpressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and their levels were positively correlated with the prognosis of NSCLC patients (38). Hence, CerS probably has different effects on the prognosis for human cancers.

Herein, we analyzed the expression level of CerS5 in cancer tissues and the prognostic status of gastric cancer patients, and found that the high expression level of CerS5 was correlated with the poor prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Moreover, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses confirmed that CerS5 is an independent risk factor for the poor prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Furthermore, we included larger cohorts to collect more gastric cancer patients from TCGA and ACRG databases in this study. Interestingly, CerS5 levels in TCGA, which mainly focused on the European and American populations, were upregulated in cancer tissues, however, were not significantly correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. The expression level of CerS5 in ACRG, which is mainly focused on the Asian population, was upregulated in cancer tissues and negatively correlated with the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Therefore, the relevance of CerS5 to the prognosis of gastric cancer patients was probably dependent on the populations.

In conclusion, our study showed that CerS5 is a differentially expressed gene in gastric cancer, and its expression level is significantly negatively correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients in the Asian population. The expression of CerS5 is correlated with the distribution of gastric cancer and the positive rate of CA50, suggesting that CerS5 is a potential screening marker for the auxiliary diagnosis of gastric cancer. Moreover, the high expression levels of CerS5 in tumor and metastatic lymph nodes indicate that CerS5 is also a potential drug treatment target for gastric cancer, which is worth exploring in the future.

However, there are still many limitations to this study. Firstly, the patients included in this study are all from one center, which might affect the results due to the limited ability of diagnosis and treatment. Secondly, the number of cases included in the study is not large enough. Larger cohorts with cases from multiple centers need to be included. Thirdly, due to the shortage of the management of the clinical data previously, some clinical information of the patients was missing. The factors analyzed in this study cannot represent all aspects of the disease. Finally, this study only investigated the relevance of CerS5 levels to the prognosis based on the retrospective data of gastric cancer patients. The mechanism of how CerS5 affects the development of gastric cancer is remaining to be addressed in the future.

Conclusions

CerS5 is universally overexpressed in cancer tissues, and its expression level is negatively correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients in the Asian population.

The article’s supplementary files as