| Literature DB >> 36236649 |
Hong-Hu Zhu1,2, Wei Liu1, Tao Wang1, Jing-Wen Su3, Bin Shi1.
Abstract
Linear infrastructures, such as railways, tunnels, and pipelines, play essential roles in economic and social development worldwide. However, under the influence of geohazards, earthquakes, and human activities, linear infrastructures face the potential risk of damage and may not function properly. Current monitoring systems for linear infrastructures are mainly based on non-contact detection (InSAR, UAV, GNSS, etc.) and geotechnical instrumentation (extensometers, inclinometers, tiltmeters, piezometers, etc.) techniques. Regarding monitoring sensitivity, frequency, and coverage, most of these methods have some shortcomings, which make it difficult to perform the accurate, real-time, and comprehensive monitoring of linear infrastructures. Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) is an emerging sensing technology that has rapidly developed in recent years. Due to its unique advantages in long-distance, high-density, and real-time monitoring, DAS arrays have shown broad application prospects in many fields, such as oil and gas exploration, seismic observation, and subsurface imaging. In the field of linear infrastructure monitoring, DAS has gradually attracted the attention of researchers and practitioners. In this paper, recent research and the development activities of applying DAS to monitor different types of linear infrastructures are critically reviewed. The sensing principles are briefly introduced, as well as the main features. This is followed by a summary of recent case studies and some critical problems associated with the implementation of DAS monitoring systems in the field. Finally, the challenges and future trends of this research area are presented.Entities:
Keywords: distributed acoustic sensing (DAS); distributed fiber-optic sensing; field monitoring; linear infrastructure
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236649 PMCID: PMC9572166 DOI: 10.3390/s22197550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Current and potential application scenarios of DAS for monitoring linear infrastructures and geohazards. Adapted with permission from Ref. [37]. 2017, MDPI publisher.
Figure 2Scattering spectra of an optical fiber. In the figure, ε represents strain, T represents temperature, V is the original light wave frequency, V represents the Brillouin shift and V represents the Raman shift.
Figure 3Generic concept of the principles of DAS. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [38]. 2021, John Wiley & Sons.
Comparison of the basic parameters of DAS interrogators.
| Parameter | HDAS | Helios DAS (Fotech) | MS-DAS2000 | IDAS3 | CRI-4400 | QuantX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain sensitivity ( | 10−9 | 10−9 | 10−9 | 10−9 | 10−9 | 10−9 |
| Spatial resolution (m) | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Sensing range without repeaters (km) | 70 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Different fiber-optic cable installation and layout methods and their characteristics.
| Method | Measurement Objects | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixture-fixed installation [ | Tunnels, pipelines, etc. | Easy installation and low cost | Poor coupling at some positions |
| Slotted and glued installation [ | Formed reinforced concrete structures | Good overall coupling effect | Time-consuming |
| Spot welding installation [ | Steel beams, rails, and other metal structures | Easy installation and low cost | Poor coupling at some positions |
| Groove installation [ | Geotechnical structures | Strong concealment and good overall coupling effect | Time-consuming |
Figure 4Schematic diagram of train positioning and speed monitoring based on DAS.
Figure 5Schematic diagram of fiber-optic cable layout and sensing. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [35]. 2020, Elsevier. In the figure, φ represents the phase information, L is the length, and ΔL is the change in length.
Figure 6Seismic records (10.0–50.0 Hz) showing the vibrations caused by motorcycles, floats, and bands. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [67]. 2020, Seismological Society of America.
Figure 7(a) A map showing the changes in average daily traffic volume before and after lockdown using DAS-based transportation analysis; (b) a map showing the degree of change in mean traffic speed before and after lockdown using DAS-based transportation analysis [63].
Figure 8Schematic diagram of pipeline intrusion and leakage monitoring based on a DAS system.
Figure 9Smart border security system. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97]. 2020, SCITEPRESS.
Comparison of various fiber-optic sensing techniques [39].
| Technique | Specifications | Measurement Parameters | Characteristics | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBG | Type: quasi-distributed | Temperature, | Simple structure, | The grating subsides under high temperatures and chirps easily under sticking and compression; it is easily damaged when processed and some information is blocked because of the quasi-distribution |
| DAS | Type: distributed | Strain, | Single-end measurement, | Huge amounts of monitoring data; |
| OFDR | Type: distributed | Strain and | High sensitivity, | Not suitable for long-distance monitoring; nonlinearity effects [ |
| BOTDA | Type: distributed | Temperature, displacement, deformations, | Double-end measurement, | Unable to detect breakpoints; |
Comparison of various fiber-optic sensing techniques [118].
| Year | Method/Technique | Sensitivity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Chirped pulse Phi-OTDR with phase-noise compensation | [ | |
| 2019 | Pulse compression with | [ |
Performance summary of CSE and DSE fibers [93].
| Fabrication Method | SNR Enhancement | Sensing Distance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSE fibers | Continuously inscribe Bragg gratings | 15 | 1 |
| Highly doped fibers | 14 | 1.9 | |
| DSE fibers | UV exposure | 5.5–21.1 | 50 |
| Femtosecond laser inscription | 13–15.8 | 9.8 |