Literature DB >> 36236586

Significant Features for Human Activity Recognition Using Tri-Axial Accelerometers.

Mohamed Bennasar1, Blaine A Price1, Daniel Gooch1, Arosha K Bandara1, Bashar Nuseibeh1,2.   

Abstract

Activity recognition using wearable sensors has become essential for a variety of applications. Tri-axial accelerometers are the most widely used sensor for activity recognition. Although various features have been used to capture patterns and classify the accelerometer signals to recognise activities, there is no consensus on the best features to choose. Reducing the number of features can reduce the computational cost and complexity and enhance the performance of the classifiers. This paper identifies the signal features that have significant discriminative power between different human activities. It also investigates the effect of sensor placement location, the sampling frequency, and activity complexity on the selected features. A comprehensive list of 193 signal features has been extracted from accelerometer signals of four publicly available datasets, including features that have never been used before for activity recognition. Feature significance was measured using the Joint Mutual Information Maximisation (JMIM) method. Common significant features among all the datasets were identified. The results show that the sensor placement location does not significantly affect recognition performance, nor does it affect the significant sub-set of features. The results also showed that with high sampling frequency, features related to signal repeatability and regularity show high discriminative power.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Physical Activity; activity of daily living; classification; feature selection; human activity recognition; tri-axial accelerometer

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36236586      PMCID: PMC9572087          DOI: 10.3390/s22197482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.847


  15 in total

1.  Eigenfaces for recognition.

Authors:  M Turk; A Pentland
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation.

Authors:  R A Washburn; K W Smith; A M Jette; C A Janney
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry.

Authors:  A Godfrey; R Conway; D Meagher; G OLaighin
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Feature selection and activity recognition system using a single triaxial accelerometer.

Authors:  Piyush Gupta; Tim Dallas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Ferhat Attal; Samer Mohammed; Mariam Dedabrishvili; Faicel Chamroukhi; Latifa Oukhellou; Yacine Amirat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Comparison of Different Sets of Features for Human Activity Recognition by Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Samanta Rosati; Gabriella Balestra; Marco Knaflitz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Enhanced Human Activity Recognition Based on Smartphone Sensor Data Using Hybrid Feature Selection Model.

Authors:  Nadeem Ahmed; Jahir Ibna Rafiq; Md Rashedul Islam
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Automated Assessment of Movement Impairment in Huntington's Disease.

Authors:  M Bennasar; Y A Hicks; S P Clinch; P Jones; C Holt; A Rosser; M Busse
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Sensor data acquisition and processing parameters for human activity classification.

Authors:  Sebastian D Bersch; Djamel Azzi; Rinat Khusainov; Ifeyinwa E Achumba; Jana Ries
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Automatic machine-learning based identification of jogging periods from accelerometer measurements of adolescents under field conditions.

Authors:  Eftim Zdravevski; Biljana Risteska Stojkoska; Marie Standl; Holger Schulz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.