| Literature DB >> 36236516 |
Abeer Mushtaq1, Maria Mumtaz1, Ali Raza1, Nema Salem2, Muhammad Naveed Yasir3.
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technology is helping humans by addressing infertility using different medical procedures that help in a successful pregnancy. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is one of those assisted reproduction methods in which the sperm and eggs are combined outside the human body in a specialized environment and kept for growth. Assisted reproductive technology is helping humans by addressing infertility using different medical procedures that help in a successful pregnancy. The morphology of the embryological components is highly related to the success of the assisted reproduction procedure. In approximately 3-5 days, the embryo transforms into the blastocyst. To prevent the multiple-birth risk and to increase the chance of pregnancy the embryologist manually analyzes the blastocyst components and selects valuable embryos to transfer to the women's uterus. The manual microscopic analysis of blastocyst components, such as trophectoderm, zona pellucida, blastocoel, and inner cell mass, is time-consuming and requires keen expertise to select a viable embryo. Artificial intelligence is easing medical procedures by the successful implementation of deep learning algorithms that mimic the medical doctor's knowledge to provide a better diagnostic procedure that helps in reducing the diagnostic burden. The deep learning-based automatic detection of these blastocyst components can help to analyze the morphological properties to select viable embryos. This research presents a deep learning-based embryo component segmentation network (ECS-Net) that accurately detects trophectoderm, zona pellucida, blastocoel, and inner cell mass for embryological analysis. The proposed method (ECS-Net) is based on a shallow deep segmentation network that uses two separate streams produced by a base convolutional block and a depth-wise separable convolutional block. Both streams are densely concatenated in combination with two dense skip paths to produce powerful features before and after upsampling. The proposed ECS-Net is evaluated on a publicly available microscopic blastocyst image dataset, the experimental segmentation results confirm the efficacy of the proposed method. The proposed ECS-Net is providing a mean Jaccard Index (Mean JI) of 85.93% for embryological analysis.Entities:
Keywords: artificial intelligence (AI); blastocyst imaging; deep learning; embryo component segmentation network (ECS-Net); embryology; embryonic analysis; in vitro fertilization (IVF)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236516 PMCID: PMC9573355 DOI: 10.3390/s22197418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Embryonic components at the blastocyst stage. Inner cell mass (ICM), blastocoel (BC), trophectoderm (TE), and zona pellucida (ZP).
Figure 2Overall summary of the proposed method.
Figure 3Architecture of the proposed ECS-Net.
Comparison between proposed ECS-Net, SegNet [34], and U-Net [35].
| ECS-Net (Proposed) | SegNet [ | UNet [ |
|---|---|---|
| The decoder is same as encoder (doubles the number of trainable parameters) | The decoder is same as encoder (doubles the number of trainable parameters). | |
| Overall 26 convolution layers | Overall 23 convolutions | |
| No connectivity is used between layers | External dense connectivity is used | |
| Unpooling layers are used for upsampling | Four up-convolutions are used for upsampling | |
| 29.4 million training parameters | 31.03 million trainable parameters |
Figure 4Connectivity of proposed ECS-Net.
Summary of training hyper-parameters.
| Training Hyper-Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Solver | Adam [ |
| Initial-learning rate (ILR) | 0.001 |
| Normalization | Global L2 |
| Iterations | 4100 |
| Mini-batch size | 12 |
| Image shuffling | Yes |
Figure 5Visual results for separate embryo components segmentation. From left-to-right column: Example-1 images with ground truth, Example-1 Predicted results by ECS-Net, Example-2 images with ground truth, and Example-2 Predicted results by ECS-Net.
Figure 6Visual results of embryo components combined segmentation using ECS-Net. From left-to-right: input images, expert label mask, segmentation by proposed ECS-Net.
Numerical performance comparison of proposed ECS-Net with existing approaches for embryo component segmentation.
| Method | ICM | BC | TE | ZP | Background | Mean Jaccard | Parameters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-Net baseline [ | 79.03 | 79.41 | 75.06 | 79.32 | 94.04 | 81.37 | 31.03 M |
| TernausNet [ | 77.58 | 78.61 | 76.16 | 80.24 | 94.50 | 81.42 | 10.0 M |
| PSP-Net [ | 78.28 | 79.26 | 74.83 | 80.57 | 94.60 | 81.51 | 35 M |
| DeepLab-V3 [ | 80.60 | 78.35 | 73.98 | 80.84 | 94.49 | 81.65 | 40.0 M |
| Blast-Net [ | 81.07 | 80.79 | 76.52 | 81.15 | 94.74 | 82.85 | 25.0 M |
| ECS-Net (Proposed) | 85.26 | 88.41 | 78.43 | 85.34 | 94.87 | 86.46 | 2.83 M |