| Literature DB >> 36236191 |
Guoquan Qi1,2, Hongxia Yan2, Dongtao Qi1, Houbu Li1, Zhao Zhang1.
Abstract
In the process of transporting oil and gas, the service performance of thermoplastic pipes will decline due to the multiple influences of medium, temperature, and pressure. In order to study the service performance changes of PVDF pipes under oil and gas transportation conditions, the high-temperature autoclave is used to simulate the service state of the pipe in the mediums. The PVDF samples are exposed to simulated oil and gas mediums for 1 week, 3 weeks, 5 weeks, and 7 weeks under 60 °C and 90 °C conditions. After the exposure test, the physical and chemical properties of the PVDF pipe are tested and compared with the initial samples. Compared with the initial sample, the sample quality after the exposure test has a slight increase, with growth rates of 2% and 3% at 60 °C and 90 °C, respectively. Meanwhile, the tensile strength of the samples is about 13% and 21% lower than that of the initial sample, respectively. According to the microscopic morphology analyses, there are some crack defects on the surface of the sample after the exposure test. Through infrared analysis, it is shown that no molecular chain breakage, crosslinking, or other reactions are found after the exposure test. The above analysis shows that the PVDF sample has slight penetration and swelling during the exposure test. However, due to the large force between the PVDF molecules, its mechanical properties have a small downward trend, showing excellent environmental stress crack resistance.Entities:
Keywords: H2S; PVDF; autoclave; exposure test; macromechanical performance; thermal performance; yield stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236191 PMCID: PMC9572739 DOI: 10.3390/polym14194244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Sample size.
Sample size description.
| Serial Number | Description | Size (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| A | Minimum total length | 150 |
| B | End width | 20 ± 0.2 |
| C | Parallel part length | 60 ± 0.5 |
| D | Parallel part width | 10 ± 0.2 |
| E | Radius | 60 |
| F | Distance between markings | 50 ± 0.5 |
| G | Distance between clamps | 115 ± 0.5 |
| H | Wall thickness | wall thickness of the pipe |
The requirements for the test medium.
| Test Medium | Composition | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gas phase | CO2 | 10 |
| H2S | 10 | |
| CH4 | 80 | |
| Liquid phase | Heptane | 70 |
| Cyclohexane | 20 | |
| Toluene | 10 |
Figure 2The weight change of PVDF after the exposure test.
Figure 3The stress–strain curves of PVDF samples at different exposure times: (a) 60 °C; (b) 90 °C.
Figure 4Yield strength and its change rate of PVDF samples at different exposure times.
Figure 5Vicat temperature of PVDF samples after the exposure test.
Figure 6The Vicat softening temperature test results.
Figure 7Melting curve of PVDF samples: (a) the original sample; (b) the sample exposed for 7 weeks at 90 °C.
Figure 8The FT-IR spectra of PVDF: (a–e) exposure time of 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 weeks.
Figure 9The SEM micrographs of PVDF.
Figure 10PVDF performance diagram.