| Literature DB >> 36236140 |
Yu-Cheng Ju1, Donyau Chiang2, Ming-Yen Tsai1, Hao Ouyang1, Sanboh Lee1.
Abstract
The graphene/poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) composites are a promising candidate for electronic, optoelectrical, and environmental applications. Understanding the mechanical degradation of PMMA-based materials is of practical importance in improving the reliability and lifespan of the associated structures and systems. In this study, we investigate the effects of functionalized graphene (FG) and UV irradiation on the stress-relaxation of PMMA. Uniaxial tensile and stress -relaxation tests are performed to evaluate the mechanical properties of the composites. The mechanical strength and elongation at the break increase with the graphene concentration but decrease with the increase of the irradiation dose. Raman spectroscopy and intrinsic viscosity measurement are applied to examine the root cause of the degradation in the composites. UV irradiation leads to polymer chain scission and loss of molecular weight. The Kelvin representation of the standard linear solid model (SLSM) is used to describe the stress-relaxation curves of the composites. The value of the elastic modulus in the Kelvin element decreases with the increase in temperature. The viscosity follows the Arrhenius equation. The activation energy of viscosity increases with the increasing FGs concentration because the FGs hinder the chain motion of PMMA. However, UV irradiation makes chain scission of PMMA/FGs composite so that the polymer chain moves more easily and the activation energy of stress relaxation lowers. The steady-state stress follows the van 't Hoff equation that stress relaxation is an exothermal deformation process. Although Maxwell's representation of SLSM is mathematically identical to the Kelvin representation of SLSM, the former cannot interpret the stress-relaxation behavior of PMMA/FGs composite, which is against the concept of Young's modulus as a decreasing temperature function.Entities:
Keywords: Kelvin representation of linear standard solid model; activation energy; graphene; poly(methyl methacrylate); stress relaxation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236140 PMCID: PMC9573155 DOI: 10.3390/polym14194192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Schematic of standard linear solid model for stress relaxation: Kelvin representation.
Figure 2The stress–strain curves of PMMA/FGs composites with different UV doses: (a) 0 J/cm2, (b) 11.3 J/cm2, and (c) 22.6 J/cm2.
The summarized data and their standard deviations of fracture stress, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break of the PMMA/FGs composites with different UV doses.
| FGs | Fracture Stress (MPa) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) | Elongation at Break (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (J/cm2) | 11.3 (J/cm2) | 22.61 (J/cm2) | 0 (J/cm2) | 11.3 (J/cm2) | 22.61 (J/cm2) | 0 (J/cm2) | 11.3 (J/cm2) | 22.61 (J/cm2) | |
| 0 | 60.98 ± 1.43 | 35.97 ± 3.27 | 28.11 ± 3.43 | 1.23 ± 0.02 | 1.16 ± 0.04 | 1.08 ± 0.02 | 7.39 ± 0.34 | 3.57 ± 0.64 | 2.97 ± 0.21 |
| 0.3 | 65.94 ± 1.42 | 40.53 ± 5.31 | 36.05 ± 3.18 | 1.30 ± 0.04 | 1.29 ± 0.03 | 1.21 ± 0.04 | 8.02 ± 0.46 | 4.21 ± 0.33 | 3.66 ± 0.54 |
| 0.7 | 70.53 ± 1.05 | 48.76 ± 2.40 | 39.08 ± 5.48 | 1.41 ± 0.02 | 1.31 ± 0.03 | 1.25 ± 0.04 | 9.53 ± 0.57 | 4.55 ± 0.42 | 4.06 ± 0.70 |
Figure 3The Raman spectrum: (a) the functionalized graphene sheet, (b) PMMA/FGs composite without UV irradiation, (c) PMMA/FGs composite with a UV dose of 11.3 J/cm2, and (d) PMMA/FGs composite with a UV dose of 22.6 J/cm2. The symbols o and × represent D, G bands and extra peak induced by UV irradiation.
The ID/IG ratio of FGs and PMMA/FGs composites with different UV doses.
| FGs (wt%) | UV Dose (J/cm2) | ID | IG | ID/IG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 0 | 18.22 | 46.46 | 0.39 |
| 0.3 | 0 | 44.68 | 48.05 | 0.93 |
| 11.3 | 36.18 | 45.96 | 0.79 | |
| 22.61 | 25.65 | 37.48 | 0.68 | |
| 0.7 | 0 | 62.48 | 52.15 | 1.20 |
| 11.3 | 42.04 | 44.83 | 0.94 | |
| 22.61 | 39.15 | 50.81 | 0.77 |
The molecular weights of PMMA and PMMA/FGs composites with different FGs concentrations and the various UV doses.
| FGs | Dose | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 J/cm2 | 11.3 J/cm2 | 22.61 J/cm2 | |
| 0 wt% | 1.32 × 105 | 9.61 × 104 | 5.04 × 104 |
| 0.3 wt% | 1.51 × 105 | 1.09 × 105 | 8.48 × 104 |
| 0.7 wt% | 1.62 × 105 | 1.23 × 105 | 8.86 × 104 |
Figure 4The plots of the logarithm of steady-state stress versus 1000/T for the PMMA/FGs composites irradiated with 11.3 J/cm2 UV dose.
The enthalpy changes of the deformation process for PMMA/FGs composites irradiated with different UV doses.
| FGs | Dose | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 J/cm2 | 11.3 J/cm2 | 22.6 J/cm2 | |
| 0 wt% | −21.08 kJ/mol | −19.14 kJ/mol | −18.97 kJ/mol |
| 0.3 wt% | −21.20 kJ/mol | −19.49 kJ/mol | −18.32 kJ/mol |
| 0.7 wt% | −21.36 kJ/mol | −19.56 kJ/mol | −18.11 kJ/mol |
Figure 5The stress–relaxation data at different temperatures for FGs/PMMA composite with (a) 0 wt% FGs, (b) 0.3 wt% FGs, and (c) 0.7 wt% FGs irradiated with 11.3 J/cm2 UV dose.
The parameters fitted the stress–relaxation data at different temperatures using the Kelvin representation of SLSM for PMMA/FGs composites with an irradiated dose of 11.3 J/cm2.
| Temperature | 80 °C | 70 °C | 60 °C | 50 °C | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGs (wt%) | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| E1k (GPa) | 0.9 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| E2k (GPa) | 0.7 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 1.35 | 1.47 | 1.47 | 2.01 | 2.33 | 2.33 | 3. | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| η2k (GPa × min) | 9. | 10. | 9.8 | 14 | 15. | 15.1 | 20. | 25 | 24.8 | 29 | 32 | 35 |
| βs (min) | 0.178 | 0.179 | 0.212 | 0.164 | 0.166 | 0.164 | 0.152 | 0.136 | 0.128 | 0.140 | 0.138 | 0.119 |
| R2 | 0.990 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.989 | 0.986 | 0.986 | 0.992 | 0.986 | 0.988 | 0.988 | 0.982 | 0.991 |
The parameters E1m, E2m, η2m, and βs at different temperatures for PMMA/FGs composites with an irradiated dose of 11.3 J/cm2.
| Temperature | 80 °C | 70 °C | 60 °C | 50 °C | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGs (%) | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| E1m (GPa) | 0.394 | 0.446 | 0.475 | 0.558 | 0.602 | 0.675 | 0.677 | 0.733 | 0.826 | 0.783 | 0.825 | 0.899 |
| E2m (GPa) | 0.506 | 0.504 | 0.585 | 0.392 | 0.418 | 0.415 | 0.343 | 0.337 | 0.314 | 0.277 | 0.275 | 0.261 |
| η2m (GPa × min) | 2.848 | 2.817 | 2.76 | 2.388 | 2.517 | 2.533 | 2.266 | 2.476 | 2.46 | 1.977 | 2.00 | 2.19 |
| βs (min) | 0.178 | 0.179 | 0.212 | 0.164 | 0.166 | 0.164 | 0.152 | 0.136 | 0.128 | 0.140 | 0.138 | 0.119 |
| R2 | 0.990 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.989 | 0.986 | 0.986 | 0.992 | 0.986 | 0.988 | 0.988 | 0.982 | 0.991 |
Figure 6The plots of ln(1/ versus 1000/T for the composites of different concentrations of FGs and UV doses.
The activation energies Q and confidential intervals R2 of the viscous behavior in the PMMA/FGs composites with different FGs concentrations and UV doses.
| Dose | 0 J/cm2 | 11.3 J/cm2 | 22.6 J/cm2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | R2 | R2 | ||||
| 0 wt% | 39.47 | 0.994 | 36.63 | 0.995 | 28.66 | 0.990 |
| 0.3 wt% | 49.99 | 0.993 | 37.84 | 0.979 | 28.52 | 0.996 |
| 0.7 wt% | 61.39 | 0.962 | 40.87 | 0.992 | 33.68 | 0.960 |