| Literature DB >> 36236138 |
Gabriel Grube Dos Santos1, Milena Schroeder Malherbi1, Natália Silva de Souza2, Gabriel Batista César3, Tania Toyomi Tominaga2, Ricardo Yoshimitsu Miyahara2, Patrícia de Souza Bonfim de Mendonça4, Daniela Renata Faria5, Jaciele Márcia Rosso6, Valdirlei Fernandes Freitas2, Wilson Ricardo Weinand6, Gustavo Sanguino Dias6, Ivair Aparecido Santos6, Luiz Fernando Cotica6, Taiana Gabriela Moretti Bonadio1,2.
Abstract
Biomaterials that effectively act in biological systems, as in treatment and healing of damaged or lost tissues, must be able to mimic the properties of the body's natural tissues in its various aspects (chemical, physical, mechanical and surface). These characteristics influence cell adhesion and proliferation and are crucial for the success of the treatment for which a biomaterial will be required. In this context, the electrospinning process has gained prominence in obtaining fibers of micro- and nanometric sizes from polymeric solutions aiming to produce scaffolds for tissue engineering. In this manuscript, poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was used as a polymeric matrix for the manufacture of piezoelectric scaffolds, exploring the formation of the β-PVDF piezoelectric phase. Micro- and nanometric hydroxyapatite (HA) particles were incorporated as a dispersed phase in this matrix, aiming to produce multifunctional composite membranes also with bioactive properties. The results show that it is possible to produce membranes containing micro- and nanofibers of the composite by the electrospinning process. The HA particles show good dispersion in the polymer matrix and predominance of β-PVDF phase. Also, the composite showed apatite growth on its surface after 21 days of immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF). Tests performed on human fibroblasts culture revealed that the electrospun membranes have low cytotoxicity attesting that the composite shows great potential to be used in biomedical applications as bone substitutions and wound healing.Entities:
Keywords: apatite; biomaterial; poly(vinylidene fluoride); scaffold
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236138 PMCID: PMC9571550 DOI: 10.3390/polym14194190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1SEM images for (a) P14, (b) P14-H10 and (c) P14-H15 scaffolds (the image was obtained after immersion in SBF 21 days).
Figure 2(a) SEM images obtained with secondary electrons detector for the P14-H10 sample. (b),(c) EDS mapping of the region presented in (a) for F and Ca elements, respectively.
Figure 3(a) SEM image of two different regions: with apatite (Spectrum 1) and without apatite (Spectrum 2) of the P14-H10 scaffold after 21 days of immersion in SBF. (b),(c) are EDS spectra in the point “Spectrum 1” and “Spectrum 2” of (a), respectively.
Figure 4XRD patterns for HA (powder), P14, P14-H10,P14-H15 and P14-H20 (scaffolds) samples.
Figure 5Absorbance ATR-FTIR spectra for (a) PVDF and (b) HA powders, (c) P14-H10, (d) P14-H15, (e) P14-H20 scaffolds.
-phase amounts calculated for different PVDF-HA samples.
| Sample | Percentage of HA | Percentage of |
|---|---|---|
| (%) | (%) | |
| PVDF (Powder) | 0 | 32.6 |
| P14 | 0 | 90.0 |
| P14-H10 | 10 | 83.7 |
| P14-H15 | 15 | 86.2 |
Figure 6P14, P14-H10 and P14-H15 in vitro cytotoxicity assessment. (a) 1 day, (b) 3 days, and (c) 7 days. Neg: Negative control, fibroblasts cells without testing materials. Pos: Positive control, fibroblasts cells with 20% DMSO.