| Literature DB >> 36236037 |
Chenming Li1, Rajesh Bhandary1, Anja Marinow1, Dmitrii Ivanov1, Mengxue Du2, René Androsch2, Wolfgang H Binder1.
Abstract
Within the era of battery technology, the urgent demand for improved and safer electrolytes is immanent. In this work, novel electrolytes, based on pyrrolidinium-bistrifluoromethanesulfonyl-imide polymeric ionic liquids (POILs), equipped with quadrupolar hydrogen-bonding moieties of ureido-pyrimidinone (UPy) to mediate self-healing properties were synthesized. Reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization was employed using S,S-dibenzyl trithiocarbonate as the chain transfer agent to produce precise POILs with a defined amount of UPy and POIL-moieties. Kinetic studies revealed an excellent control over molecular weight and polydispersity in all polymerizations, with a preferable incorporation of UPy monomers in the copolymerizations together with the ionic monomers. Thermogravimetric analysis proved an excellent thermal stability of the polymeric ionic liquids up to 360 °C. By combining the results from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS), and rheology, a decoupled conductivity of the POILs from glass transition was revealed. While the molecular weight was found to exert the main influence on ionic conductivity, the ultimate strength and the self-healing efficiency (of up to 88%) were also affected, as quantified by tensile tests for both pristine and self-healed samples, evidencing a rational design of self-healing electrolytes bearing both hydrogen bonding moieties and low-molecular-weight polymeric ionic liquids.Entities:
Keywords: RAFT polymerization; hydrogen bonds; polymeric ionic liquids
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236037 PMCID: PMC9572781 DOI: 10.3390/polym14194090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Data from RAFT polymerizations of ILA and the resulting homopolymer POIL-x.
| Sample | Entry | M/CTA a |
|
| PDI d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 20:1 | 70 | 7 | 38% | 3900 | 8000 | 1.26 |
| 2 | 20:1 | 80 | 7 | 62% | 6100 | 11,000 | 1.26 | |
| 3 | 100:1 | 80 | 7 | 67% | 32,500 | 40,100 | 1.34 | |
| 4 | 200:1 | 80 | 7 | 79% | 75,800 | 82,100 | 1.36 |
a Polymerization was carried out in DMF with AIBN as the initiator, and the ratio of [DBTTC]/[AIBN] was kept to 1:0.1 while the monomer concentration was kept at 1 mmol monomer in 1 mL DMF; b conversion was detected by 1H NMR using trioxane as reference; c the number-average molecular weight calculated by the equation: Mn,th = conv. × ([MILA]/[DBTTC]) × mILA + mDBTTC; d PDI was determined by DMF + LiTFSI (0.1 M) GPC with a PS standard.
Scheme 1Synthetic route towards the POIL-x and CPILU-y (bearing the IL and the self-healing UPy moieties): (a) precursor CPA: acryloyl chloride with chloropropanol and triethylamine (TEA) at room temperature for 24 h; (b) ionic monomer ILA: CPA with 1-methyl pyrrolidine in MeCN at 75 °C for 24 h; (c) with LiTFSI in H2O at room temperature for 24 h; (d) HBs monomer UPyA: 6-methylisocytosine in DMSO at 120 °C, followed by isocyanatoethyl acrylate and stirring at room temperature for 3 h; (e) homopolymers POIL-x: DBTTC and AIBN in DMF at 70/80 °C for 7 h; (f) copolymers CPILU-y: DBTTC and AIBN in DMF at 80 °C.
Figure 1Kinetic plots of RAFT (a) homopolymerizations of ILA under the conditions: [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 70 °C (red square), [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 80 °C (blue circle), and [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 100:1 at 80 °C (orange triangle); (b) copolymerizations of ILA with UPyA under the conditions: [ILA + UPyA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 80 °C (green rhombus) and [ILA + UPyA]/[DBTTC] = 100:1 at 80 °C (brown star); and (c) photos of the copolymers CPILU-y with various contents of UPy moieties.
Data from RAFT copolymerizations of ILA with UPyA and the resulting copolymer CPILU-y.
| Sample | Entry | M/CTA a | DPIL e | DPUPy f |
| PDI h | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5 | 20:1 | 5% | 80 | 7 | 55% | 4% | 22.5 | 0.9 | 5400 | 11,800 | 1.35 |
| 6 | 20:1 | 15% | 80 | 7 | 77% | 14% | 18.6 | 2.6 | 7200 | 10,700 | 1.32 | |
| 7 | 20:1 | 25% | 80 | 7 | 84% | 24% | 18.7 | 4.5 | 7400 | 10,500 | 1.25 | |
| 8 | 100:1 | 5% | 80 | 7 | 65% | 4% | 90.1 | 3.6 | 30,700 | 44,400 | 1.36 |
a Polymerization was carried out in DMF with AIBN as the initiator, and the ratio of [DBTTC]/[AIBN] was kept to 1:0.1, while the monomer concentration was kept at 1 mmol monomer in 1 mL DMF; b fUPy was the initial molar fraction of UPyA in the monomer mixture; c conversion was detected by 1H NMR using trioxane as reference; d FUPy was the final molar fraction of UPyA on the polymer backbone, calculated from 1H NMR; e, f calculated from relative integral of protons from 1H NMR (for details see Supplementary Material Section S1.2); g the number-average molecular weight calculated by the equation: Mn,th = conv. × [([MILA]/[DBTTC]) × mILA + ([MUPyA]/[DBTTC]) × mUPyA] + mDBTTC; h PDI was determined by DMF + LiTFSI (0.1 M) GPC with PS standard.
Thermal characterization data of ILA, UPyA, POIL-x, and CPILU-y via thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry.
| Sample | Entry | Sample Info. | 5 wt%-loss | Onset | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| - | monomer | 348 | 348 | - |
|
| - | monomer | 201 | 198 | - |
|
| 2 | 11 k | 348 | 353 | −13 |
| 3 | 40 k | 360 | 357 | 7 | |
|
| 5 | 4%, 12 k | 338 | 198, 360 | 9 |
| 6 | 14%, 11 k | 297 | 212, 365 | 13 | |
| 7 | 24%, 10 k | 263 | 215, 363 | 30 |
a Glass transition temperature via DSC.
Figure 2Thermal characterization of ionic monomer ILA, HBs monomer UPyA, homopolymers POIL-x, and copolymers CPILU-y via (a) thermogravimetric analysis measured at a heating rate of 10 K·min−1 under N2 atmosphere; and (b) differential scanning calorimetry measured at a heating rate of 5 K·min−1 with the thermal history cancelled by a preheating/cooling circle (the baseline of POIL-3 was corrected manually).
Figure 3Conductivity σ of homo-/copolymer POIL-x and CPILU-y (a) as a function of inverse temperature 1000/T; (c) glass transition temperature divided by measurement temperature Tg/T; and (b) zero shear viscosity η0 of homo-/copolymer POIL-x and CPILU-y versus temperature T.
Glass transition temperature and conductivity at glass transition temperature, and zero shear viscosity and conductivity at 80 °C of POIL-x and CPILU-y.
| Sample | Entry | Sample Info. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2 | 11 k | −13 | 3.07 × 10−9 (−10 °C) | 6.5 | 43 | 2.46 × 10−4 |
| 3 | 40 k | 7 | 2.04 × 10−8 (10 °C) | 7.3 | 368 | 9.09 × 10−5 | |
|
| 5 | 4%, 12 k | 9 | 2.55 × 10−7 (10 °C) | 8.4 | 37 | 2.19 × 10−4 |
| 6 | 14%, 11 k | 13 | 2.19 × 10−8 (20 °C) | 7.3 | 2.76 × 103 | 4.85 × 10−5 | |
| 7 | 24%, 10 k | 30 | 3.27 × 10−8 (30 °C) | 7.5 | 2.84 × 105 | 1.84 × 10−5 |
a Glass transition temperature via DSC; b conductivity at glass transition temperature; c decoupling index calculated with Rσ, Tg = 15 + log σTg; d zero shear viscosity at 80 °C; e and conductivity at 80 °C.
Figure 4(a) Visualized self-healing of CPILU-9; and (b) stress–strain curves of pristine (solid line) and self-healed (at 40 °C for 1 h, dash line) CPILU-9 and CPILU-10 at a strain rate of 20 mm·min−1 at room temperature.