| Literature DB >> 36236031 |
Ali Farokhi Nejad1,2, Seyd Saied Rahimian Koloor2,3,4, Mohd Luqman Hakim Arifin2, Ali Shafiei2,5, Shukur Abu Hassan2,6, Mohd Yazid Yahya2,6.
Abstract
The crashworthiness of composite tubes is widely examined for various types of FRP composites. However, the use of hybrid composites potentially enhances the material characteristics under impact loading. In this regard, this study used a combination of unidirectional glass-carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin as the hybrid composite tube fabricated by the pultrusion method. Five tubes with different length aspect ratios were fabricated and tested, in which the results demonstrate "how structural energy absorption affects by increasing the length of tubes". Crash force efficiency was used as the criterion to show that the selected L/D are acceptable of crash resistance with 95% efficiency. Different chamfering shapes as the trigger mechanism were applied to the tubes and the triggering effect was examined to understand the impact capacity of different tubes. A finite element model was developed to evaluate different crashworthiness indicators of the test. The results were validated through a good agreement between experimental and numerical simulations. The experimental and numerical results show that hybrid glass/carbon tubes accomplish an average 25.34 kJ/kg specific energy absorption, average 1.43 kJ energy absorption, average 32.43 kN maximum peak load, and average 96.67% crash force efficiency under quasi-static axial loading. The results show that selecting the optimum trigger mechanism causes progressive collapse and increases the specific energy absorption by more than 35%.Entities:
Keywords: axial load; composite tube; crashworthiness; energy absorption; finite element model; hybrid composites
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236031 PMCID: PMC9572766 DOI: 10.3390/polym14194083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Schematic view of pultrusion processing method.
Figure 2Setup of experiment for compression loading test.
The general information about the composite tube materials.
| Composite Tube Elements | Product Name | Manufacturer | Tensile Strength | Density |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epoxy resin | EPON™ Resin 862 | Westlake | 76 MPa | 1.15 g/cm3 |
| hardener | EPIKURE Curing Agent W | |||
| Carbon fibre | PX35 | ZOLTEK | 4200 MPa | 1.2 g/cm3 |
| Glass fibre | Glass fibre yarn 0.3 mm | Wee Tee Tong Chemicals | 3445 MPa | 2.54 g/cm3 |
Figure 3Setup of the experiment for material characterization.
The material properties of hybrid carbon/glass fibre/epoxy unidirectional composite.
| Symbol | Description | Unit | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Density | Kg/m3 | 1520 |
|
| Module of elasticity | GPa | 58 |
|
| Module of elasticity | GPa | 14.2 |
|
| Shear modules | GPa | 11.8 |
|
| Shear modules | GPa | 0.85 |
|
| Poisson’s ratio | - | 0.29 |
|
| Poisson’s ratio | - | 0.14 |
|
| Normal tensile strength | MPa | 109 |
|
| Normal compressive strength | MPa | 280 |
|
| Transverse tensile strength | MPa | 67 |
|
| Transverse compressive strength | MPa | 190 |
| S | Shear strength | MPa | 54 |
|
| Fracture strain | - | 0.035 |
|
| Energy release rate | U/mm2 | 20 |
Figure 4The different chamfered samples as the trigger mechanism.
Figure 5The FE model of the structure under load and the boundary conditions.
Figure 6The deformed shape of specimens in the experimental test.
Figure 7The load-displacement curves for different aspect ratios (a) L/D = 1, (b) L/D = 1.5, (c) L/D = 2, (d) L/D = 2.5 and (e) L/D = 3 of composite tubes.
The crashworthiness indicators of test specimens with various aspect ratios.
| Specimen Label | Crush Length (m) | Fmax (Ave) (kN) | EA Avg (kJ) | SEA Avg (kJ/kg) | CFE Avg (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FE | EXP | FE | EXP | FE | EXP | FE | EXP | ||
| L/D-1 | 0.027 | 29.66 | 28.20 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 25.1 | 24.84 | 95.67 | 95.27 |
| L/D-1.5 | 0.04 | 31.9 | 32.45 | 1.21 | 1.19 | 29.92 | 29.78 | 97.85 | 95.74 |
| L/D-2 | 0.056 | 38.75 | 27.13 | 1.1 | 1.008 | 20.24 | 20.16 | 96.63 | 95.20 |
| L/D-2.5 | 0.071 | 31.2 | 29.79 | 1.82 | 1.76 | 25.35 | 25.24 | 96.56 | 98.98 |
| L/D-3 | 0.085 | 41.98 | 33.58 | 2.4 | 2.22 | 22.36 | 22.28 | 98.31 | 96.37 |
Figure 8Presentation of L/D influence on the CFE factor.
Figure 9Comparison between triggered mechanisms and normal specimen based on load-displacement curves.
Figure 10Representation of crashworthiness indicators from FE simulation and experimental data.
Figure 11Failure mechanisms of composite tubes with a different chamfering trigger mechanisms.