| Literature DB >> 36236012 |
Muhammad Rizal Muhammad Asyraf1,2,3, Agusril Syamsir1,4, Nazirul Mubin Zahari4, Abu Bakar Mohd Supian1, Fathoni Usman1,4, Zarina Itam4.
Abstract
Pultruded glass-fibre reinforced polymer (pGFRP) composites are classified as lightweight material, which exhibit high strength-to-weight ratio for structural usage. This composite material has been applied as cross-arm members in transmission towers due to its ability in thermal and electrical insulation. However, the influence of the stacking sequence of pGFRP composite on its mechanical performance has not been fully covered in the literature to explain the long-term durability of the current cross-arm designs. The study expected to evaluate five fiber layers with various stacking sequences in terms of quasi-static and creep tests in a four-point bending mode. The creep test was performed for 1440 h (60 days). These composites were fabricated using the pultrusion process in the form of a square hollow structure. Later, it was cut into composite coupons with various sizes depending on the test conducted. The results showed that nine layers with 0°/45°/0°/-45°/0°/-45°/0°/45°/0° had the ultimate flexural strength. This stacking sequence configurations seemed to be optimally manufactured in continuous roving fibre by alternating between 0° and ±45° fiber orientations. Additionally, the S-9 pGFRP composite sample showed that it had a low-creep deflection with high elastic and apparent creep moduli in 1440 h. In terms of strength reduction factor, this configuration was recorded as the highest. The findings showed that the nine layers of pGFRP composites with alternation of 0° and ±45° fiber orientations were highly suitable for structural application at transmission towers for a long-term operation.Entities:
Keywords: GFRP composite; creep properties; electricity; energy and transmission; findley’s power law model; pultrusion; stacking sequence
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236012 PMCID: PMC9570742 DOI: 10.3390/polym14194064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Schematic diagram of pultrusion process of glass fibre/UPE composite beams.
Figure 2Stacking sequence of pGFRP composite samples such as (a) S-3, (b) S-5, (c) S-7, (d) S-9 and (e) S-10.
Configuration of glass fibre/UPE composites.
| No. | Configuration | Number of Layer | Layering Sequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | S-3 | 3 | 45°/0°/45° |
| 2. | S-5 | 5 | 45°/−45°/90°/0°/45° |
| 3. | S-7 | 7 | 45°/−45°/0°/90°/0°/90°/0° |
| 4. | S-9 | 9 | 0°/45°/0°/−45°/0°/−45°/0°/45°/0° |
| 5. | S-10 | 10 | 45°/−45°/0°/0°/0°/0°/0°/0°/−45°/45° |
Fibre and polymer fraction mass for each configuration.
| No. | Configuration | Fibre Mass (%) | Resin Mass (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | S-3 | 64.11 | 35.89 |
| 2. | S-5 | 64.67 | 35.33 |
| 3. | S-7 | 72.77 | 27.33 |
| 4. | S-9 | 78.04 | 21.96 |
| 5. | S-10 | 74.17 | 25.83 |
Figure 3Schematic diagram of flexural creep setup as per ASTM D6272 with dimensions of flexural specimens.
Figure 4A coupon sample under four-point bending creep.
Maximum flexural load and ultimate flexural strength of pGFRP composites.
| pGFRP Composite Configurations | Sample | Maximum Flexural Load (N) | Average Maximum Flexural Load (N) | Standard Deviation | Percentage Error (%) | Ultimate Flexural Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-3 | Sample 1 | 1697.38 | 1694 | 24 | 1.42 | 267.88 |
| Sample 2 | 1724.78 | |||||
| Sample 3 | 1704.73 | |||||
| S-5 | Sample 1 | 1152.99 | 1108 | 31 | 2.94 | 175.21 |
| Sample 2 | 1051.14 | |||||
| Sample 3 | 1091.80 | |||||
| S-7 | Sample 1 | 2250.65 | 2251 | 42 | 1.07 | 355.96 |
| Sample 2 | 2251.88 | |||||
| Sample 3 | 2281.96 | |||||
| S-9 | Sample 1 | 2799.12 | 2759 | 26 | 0.94 | 436.29 |
| Sample 2 | 2765.66 | |||||
| Sample 3 | 2783.42 | |||||
| S-10 | Sample 1 | 1789.24 | 1828 | 37 | 2.02 | 289.07 |
| Sample 2 | 1820.41 | |||||
| Sample 3 | 1868.92 |
Figure 5Ultimate flexural strength of pGRRP composites with various stacking sequences.
Summary of the maximum flexural load and creep load levels.
| Sequence | Ultimate Flexural load (N) | Load Level | Applied Load (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S-3 | 1694 | 12% | 203.28 |
| 24% | 406.56 | ||
| 37% | 626.78 | ||
| S-5 | 1108 | 12% | 132.96 |
| 24% | 256.92 | ||
| 37% | 409.96 | ||
| S-7 | 2251 | 12% | 270.12 |
| 24% | 540.24 | ||
| 37% | 832.87 | ||
| S-9 | 2759 | 12% | 331.08 |
| 24% | 662.16 | ||
| 37% | 1020.83 | ||
| S-10 | 1694 | 12% | 203.28 |
| 24% | 406.56 | ||
| 37% | 626.78 |
Figure 6Creep deflection for pGFRP cross arm that subjected to (a) 12%; (b) 24%; and (c) 37% of load levels.
m and n values for all composite configurations.
| Samples | Load (%) |
| Average |
| Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-3 | 12 | 0.0954 | 0.1769 | 0.0097 | 0.00743 |
| 24 | 0.2315 | 0.0071 | |||
| 37 | 0.2038 | 0.0055 | |||
| S-5 | 12 | 0.3000 | 0.3070 | 0.0020 | 0.00567 |
| 24 | 0.3424 | 0.0051 | |||
| 37 | 0.2786 | 0.0099 | |||
| S-7 | 12 | 0.1290 | 0.2694 | 0.0088 | 0.00553 |
| 24 | 0.4340 | 0.0012 | |||
| 37 | 0.2452 | 0.0066 | |||
| S-9 | 12 | 0.149 | 0.1317 | 0.0019 | 0.00737 |
| 24 | 0.1803 | 0.0071 | |||
| 37 | 0.0658 | 0.0131 | |||
| S-10 | 12 | 0.0582 | 0.1920 | 0.0464 | 0.01953 |
| 24 | 0.2843 | 0.0031 | |||
| 37 | 0.2335 | 0.0091 |
Flexural creep data based on Findley’s power law model.
| Configurations | Load Level (%) | Instantaneous Deflection, | Elastic Modulus, | Creep Modulus at 1440 Hrs, | Strength Reduction Factor,
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-3 | 12 | 2.20 | 30,543.00 | 28,232.00 | 0.942 |
| 24 | 3.30 | 41,664.00 | 37,874.00 | 0.909 | |
| 37 | 4.30 | 48,174.00 | 45,948.00 | 0.954 | |
| S-5 | 12 | 1.96 | 23,064.85 | 20,544.00 | 0.891 |
| 24 | 3.34 | 28,436.11 | 22,523.00 | 0.792 | |
| 37 | 4.48 | 24,617.29 | 20,863.00 | 0.847 | |
| S-7 | 12 | 2.32 | 21,930.00 | 19,994.00 | 0.910 |
| 24 | 4.28 | 23,771.00 | 22,304.00 | 0.940 | |
| 37 | 6.44 | 24,377.00 | 22,976.00 | 0.940 | |
| S-9 | 12 | 1.96 | 39,556.02 | 38,457.00 | 0.970 |
| 24 | 3.34 | 46,588.20 | 43,179.00 | 0.930 | |
| 37 | 4.48 | 53,462.59 | 51,055.00 | 0.950 | |
| S-10 | 12 | 2.20 | 15,812.00 | 12,004.00 | 0.760 |
| 24 | 4.00 | 17,790.00 | 16,756.00 | 0.940 | |
| 37 | 4.50 | 23,983.00 | 21,617.00 | 0.900 |
Figure 7Changes of creep modulus between initial and final periods for all pGFRP composite configurations.
Figure 8Average strength reduction factor in 1440 h (60 days).