| Literature DB >> 36235920 |
Fawzia A Alshubaily1, Ebtihaj J Jambi1.
Abstract
Various therapies for osteoporosis successfully reduce bone loss and fractures, but they mostly do not contribute to new bone structures and adversely affect patients. Shilajit is a natural mineral substance comprised of multi-components, with proved efficacy to improve immunity, antioxidant activity, and disease resistance. In the present study, various effects of shilajit water extract (SWE) on bone development and its management were determined in experimental glucocorticoid-induced osteoporotic rats. The fabrication of nanochitosan (NCT) and NCT conjugation with SWE were conducted and evaluated as enhanced formulations for treating osteoporosis. NCT and SWE/NCT had mean particle diameters of 196.4 and 248.4 nm, respectively, with high positivity charging and stability. The biochemical and anti-osteoporotic effects of SWE and SWE/NCT conjugates were investigated on different groups of compromised rats. Five groups each including six adult albino female rats were formed and treated for a duration of eight weeks with SWE and SWE/NCT conjugate. Significantly improved serum calcium, phosphorus, osteocalcin, and calcitonin levels but decreased hydrogen peroxide, IL-6, and antioxidant biomarkers were recorded in all SWE- and SWE/NCT-treated groups; the SWE/NCT treatment was most effectual treatment. These results suggest that SWE and SWE/NCT may cause anti-osteoporotic activity by reducing oxidative stress, IL-6, and H2O2 while restoring antioxidant levels. The conjugation of SWE onto NCT is highly recommended for augmenting their activities.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant biomarkers; in vivo; nano-conjugation; nanopolymers carriers; shilajit extract
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235920 PMCID: PMC9571855 DOI: 10.3390/polym14193972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1The infrared analysis (FTIR) of employed molecules in the current study, including (A) nanochitosan, (B) shilajit water extract and (C) their composites. The blue vertical lines indicate the derived bonds from SWE and the red lines indicate the derived bonds from NCT in the SWE/NCT spectrum.
Figure 2Scanning microscopy imaging of (A): synthesized nanochitosan and (B): its conjugates with shilajit water extract.
Serum concentrations of calcium (ca), phosphorus (p), osteocalcin (OC), calcitonin (CT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the control and treatment groups.
| Groups * | Biochemical Parameters ** | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | P | OC | CT pg/mL | IL-6 | |
| Group (1) | 9.81 ± 0.318 a | 6.00 ± 0.554 a | 5.30 ± 0.394 a | 4.96 ± 0.194 a | 6.41 ± 0.331 a |
| Group (2) | 7.93 ± 0.216 b | 3.61 ± 0.392 b | 9.60 ± 0.651 b | 2.01 ± 0.210 b | 21.13 ± 1.433 b |
| Group (3) | 8.10 ± 0.126 ab | 4.58 ± 0.213 ab | 7.45 ± 0.398 ab | 2.85 ± 0.149 ab | 12.28 ± 0.348 ab |
| Group (4) | 8.70 ± 0.236 ab | 5.30 ± 0.282 ab | 6.40 ± 0.328 ab | 3.86 ± 0.190 ab | 9.20 ± 0.316 ab |
| Group (5) | 9.52 ± 0.134 a | 5.82 ± 0.437 a | 5.95 ± 0.312 ab | 4.48 ± 0.196 ab | 7.92 ± 0.428 ab |
* Study groups (6 animals each) included the negative control (Group 1), the positive control (Group 2), shilajit treated with a dose of 150 mg/kg (Group 3), shilajit treated with a dose of 250 mg/kg (Group 4) and shilajit/nanochitosan treated with a dose of 500 mg/kg (Group 5). ** Results are expressed as the means ± SD. a Shows a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to Group 2. b Shows a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to Group 1.
Concentrations of bone tissue oxidative stress parameters and antioxidant biomarkers in the control and treatment groups.
| Groups * | Biochemical Parameters ** | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD | TAC | MDA | H2O2
| |
| Group (1) | 307.83 ± 15.67 a | 2.48 ± 0.125 a | 2.53 ± 0.408 a | 1.33 ± 0.249 a |
| Group (2) | 137.33 ± 15.97 b | 0.7467 ± 0.092 b | 6.68 ± 0.318 b | 4.25 ± 0.278 b |
| Group (3) | 186.33 ± 6.77 ab | 1.10 ± 0.186 ab | 5.50 ± 0.334 ab | 3.30 ± 0.228 ab |
| Group (4) | 247.00 ± 7.69 ab | 2.05 ± 0.134 ab | 4.08 ± 0.331 ab | 2.44 ± 0.301 ab |
| Group (5) | 293.66 ± 12.61 b | 2.41 ± 0.131 b | 3.15 ± 0.411 ab | 1.53 ± 0.292 b |
* Study groups (6 animals each) included the negative control (Group 1), the positive control (Group 2), shilajit treated with a dose of 150 mg/kg (Group 3), shilajit treated with a dose of 250 mg/kg (Group 4) and shilajit/nanochitosan treated with a dose of 500 mg/kg (Group 5). ** Results are expressed as the means ± SD. a Shows a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to Group 2. b Shows a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to Group 1.
Correlation coefficient (r) values for some measured parameters in all groups *.
| Ca | P | IL-6 | OC | CT | MDA | H2O2 | SOD | TAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | 0.811 | 0.792 | 0.797 | 0.925 | 0.906 | 0.899 | 0.890 | 0.890 | |
| P | 0.811 | 0.906 | 0.851 | 0.902 | 0.916 | 0.914 | 0.900 | 0.909 | |
| IL-6 | 0.792 | 0.906 | 0.938 | 0.917 | 0.913 | 0.924 | 0.910 | 0.886 | |
| OC | 0.797 | 0.851 | 0.938 | 0.936 | 0.909 | 0.917 | 0.931 | 0.906 | |
| CT | 0.925 | 0.902 | 0.917 | 0.936 | 0.966 | 0.964 | 0.970 | 0.954 | |
| MDA | 0.906 | 0.916 | 0.913 | 0.909 | 0.966 | 0.951 | 0.959 | 0.947 | |
| H2O2 | 0.899 | 0.914 | 0.924 | 0.917 | 0.964 | 0.951 | 0.958 | 0.931 | |
| SOD | 0.890 | 0.900 | 0.910 | 0.931 | 0.970 | 0.959 | 0.958 | 0.961 | |
| TAC | 0.890 | 0.909 | 0.886 | 0.906 | 0.954 | 0.947 | 0.931 | 0.961 |
* Correlation was deemed significant at the 0.01 level (2 tailed).
Figure 3H and E-stained microscopic images of rats’ hepatic (L) and renal (K) tissues in the groups under study. 1: the negative control group (group 1); 2: the positive control group (group 2); 3: the low-dose-SWE-treated group (group 3); 4: the high-dose SWE-treated group (group 4); and 5: the SWE/NCT-treated group (group 5).