| Literature DB >> 36235552 |
Szymon Sip1, Anna Sip2, Piotr Szulc3, Judyta Cielecka-Piontek1.
Abstract
The presented research evaluates the medical use potential of Lonicera caerulea leaves, which are waste plants in cultivating berries. The study's screening activity included the leaves of five varieties of Lonicera caerulea: Atut, Duet, Wojtek, Zojka, and Jugana. The microbiological analysis confirmed the safety of using Lonicera caerulea leaves without significant stabilization. Lonicera caerulea leaves standardization was carried out based on the results of the chromatographic analysis, and it showed differences in the contents of active compounds (loganic, chlorogenic and caffeic acids, and rutin), which are attributed to biological activity. For the Lonicera caerulea leaves varieties tested, the differences in the content of total polyphenol content, chlorophylls, and carotenoids were also confirmed. The screening of biological activity of five Lonicera caerulea leaf varieties was carried out concerning the possibility of inhibiting the activity of α-glucosidase, lipase, and hyaluronidase as well, and the antioxidant potential was determined. The defined profile of the biological activity of Lonicera caerulea leaves makes it possible to indicate this raw material as an essential material supporting the prevention and treatment of type II diabetes. However, this research showed that tested enzymes were strongly inhibited by the variety Jugana. The health-promoting potential of Lonicera caerulea leaves was correlated with the highest chlorogenic acid and rutin content in the variety Jugana.Entities:
Keywords: Lonicera caerulea; active substances; antioxidants; diabetes mellitus; haskap berry leaves; inhibition of the enzyme
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235552 PMCID: PMC9573050 DOI: 10.3390/nu14193898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Microbiological purity of haskap berry leaves.
| Samples | Counts of Microorganisms (CFU/g DL **) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB * | ANB * | MY * | En * |
| Sal * | |
| Atut | 5.1 × 103 | 5.5 × 103 | 2.1 × 102 | n/f | n/f | n/f |
| Duet | 9.2 × 102 | 9.9 × 102 | 3.0 × 101 | n/f | n/f | n/f |
| Wojtek | 3.5 × 102 | 3.8 × 102 | 2.0 × 101 | n/f | n/f | n/f |
| Zojka | 2.0 × 102 | 2.9 × 102 | 5.0 × 102 | n/f | n/f | n/f |
| Jugana | 6.4 × 103 | 5.2 × 103 | 3.2 × 102 | n/f | n/f | n/f |
* AB–aerobic bacteria; ANB–anaerobic bacteria; MY–mold and yeast; EN–Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative bacteria: E.coli–Escherichia coli; Sal–Salmonella; n/f–not found; ** DL–dry mass of leaves material.
Quantitative evaluation of haskap berry leaves at the begging and after 6 months.
| Variety | TPC (mg/g DL *) | Chlorophyll A (mg/g DL *) | Chlorophyll B (mg/g DL *) | Carotenoids (mg/g DL *) | Water Content (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | |
| Atut | 49.618 ± 1.352 | 47.494 ± 1.471 | 11.659 ± 0.511 | 11.401 ± 0.131 | 4.540 ± 0.121 | 4.398 ± 0.141 | 1.956 ± 0.084 | 1.901 ± 0.061 | 5.43 ± 0.32 | 5.66 ± 0.15 |
| Duet | 44.893 ± 2.344 | 43.146 ± 0.782 | 12.753 ± 0.449 | 12.483 ± 0.097 | 5.484 ± 0.096 | 5.331 ± 0.135 | 2.163 ± 0.095 | 2.096 ± 0.023 | 5.75 ± 0.41 | 5.97 ± 0.18 |
| Wojtek | 28.179 ± 0.983 | 27.072 ± 0.761 | 10.642 ± 0.387 | 10.293 ± 0.190 | 4.463 ± 0.174 | 4.309 ± 0.136 | 1.848 ± 0.117 | 1.807 ± 0.021 | 6.23 ± 0.37 | 6.48 ± 0.33 |
| Zojka | 32.127 ± 1.085 | 31.223 ± 0.752 | 13.382 ± 0.533 | 12.902 ± 0.122 | 5.632 ± 0.153 | 5.474 ± 0.152 | 2.217 ± 0.126 | 2.150 ± 0.041 | 6.56 ± 0.49 | 6.84 ± 0.40 |
| Jugana | 52.399 ± 1.730 | 50.956 ± 0.971 | 14.003 ± 0.312 | 13.673 ± 0.097 | 5.575 ± 0.113 | 5.409 ± 0.243 | 2.876 ± 0.081 | 2.806 ± 0.097 | 6.38 ± 0.37 | 6.59 ± 0.22 |
* DL–Dry mass of leaves material; Data expressed as mean ± SD.
Results of the content of active substances by HPLC for haskap berry leaves in T = 0 and T = 6 months.
| Variety | Loganic Acid (mg/g DL *) | Chlorogenic Acid (mg/g DL *) | Caffeic Acid (mg/g DL *) | Rutin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | T = 0 Months | T = 6 Months | |
| Atut | 2.511 ± 0.121 * | 2.498 ± 0.103 * | 0.879 ± 0.112 * | 0.804 ± 0.107 * | 0.039 ± 0.003 * | 0.035 ± 0.002 * | 0.730 ± 0.243 * | 0.708 ± 0.222 * |
| Duet | 1.870 ± 0.151 * | 1.801 ± 0.125 * | 0.618 ± 0.157 * | 0.578 ± 0.121 * | 0.019 ± 0.002 * | 0.017 ± 0.001 * | 0.519 ± 0.353 * | 0.498 ± 0.334 * |
| Wojtek | 1.764 ± 0.183 * | 1.705 ± 0.091 * | 0.345 ± 0.104 * | 0.309 ± 0.070 * | 0.045 ± 0.003 * | 0.041 ± 0.003 * | 0.125 ± 0.274 * | 0.111 ± 0.207 * |
| Zojka | 0.803 ± 0.156 * | 0.801 ± 0.103 * | 0.389 ± 0.156 * | 0.366 ± 0.123 * | 0.056 ± 0.001 * | 0.055 ± 0.002 * | 0.143 ± 0.196 * | 0.140 ± 0.204 |
| Jugana | 2.981 ± 0.172 * | 2905 ± 0.150 * | 0.987 ± 0.073 * | 0.924 ± 0.097 * | 0.078 ± 0.002 * | 0.070 ± 0.003 * | 0.879 ± 0.124 * | 0.877 ± 0.113 |
* Dry mass of leaves material; Data expressed as mean ± SD.
In vitro activity of haskap berry leaves water extracts.
| Cultivar | IC50 (µg/mL) | For an Extract with a Concentration of 20 mg/mL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition of α-Glucosidase | % of Inhibition of Lipase | % of Inhibition of Hyaluronidase | |
| Atut | 234.53 ± 3.35 * | 21.26 ± 1.32 * | 20.16 ± 1.77 * |
| Duet | 285.76 ± 2.84 * | 15.21 ± 1.11 * | 14.37 ± 1.65 * |
| Wojtek | 354.45 ± 4.01 * | 26.26 ± 2.01 * | 28.14 ± 1.43 * |
| Zojka | 336.23 ± 3.07 * | 22.78 ± 1.87 * | 24.14 ± 2.03 * |
| Jugana | 227.43 ± 2.98 * | 32.87 ± 1.56 * | 36.37 ± 1.67 * |
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| Atut | 121.04 ± 2.11 * | 0.79 ± 0.08 * | |
| Duet | 102.42 ± 4.33 * | 0.89 ± 0.04 * | |
| Wojtek | 113.77 ± 1.79 * | 0.71 ± 0.05 * | |
| Zojka | 140.57 ± 1.24 * | 0.77 ± 0.07 * | |
| Jugana | 93.36 ± 2.18 * | 0.59 ± 0.02 * | |
Data expressed as mean ± SD; * significance with p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1Inhibition of α-glucosidase activity by aqueous extracts of haskap berry leaves.
Figure 2Inhibition of lipase activity by aqueous extracts of haskap berry leaves.
Figure 3Inhibition of hyaluronidase activity by aqueous extracts of haskap berry leaves.
Figure 4DPPH radical scavenging activity of aqueous extracts of haskap berry leaves.
Figure 5Antioxidative activity of aqueous water extracts of haskap berry leaves in FRAP model.