| Literature DB >> 36235507 |
Anning Zhang1, Yi Liu1,2, Feiming Wang1, Deyan Kong1, Junguo Bi1, Fenyun Zhang1, Xingxing Luo1, Jiahong Wang1, Guolan Liu1, Lijun Luo1, Xinqiao Yu1.
Abstract
Rice production is often affected by biotic and abiotic stressors. The breeding of resistant cultivars is a cost-cutting and environmentally friendly strategy to maintain a sustainable high production level. An elite water-saving and drought-resistant rice (WDR), Hanhui3, is susceptible to blast and bacterial blight (BB). This study was conducted to introgress three resistance genes (Pi2, xa5, and Xa23) for blast and BB into Hanhui3, using marker-assisted selection (MAS) for the foreground selection and a whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array for the background selection. As revealed by the whole-genome SNP array, the recurrent parent genome (RPG) recovery of the improved NIL was 94.2%. The resistance levels to blast and BB of the improved NIL and its derived hybrids were higher than that of the controls. In addition, the improved NIL and its derived hybrids retained the desired agronomic traits from Hanhui3, such as yield. The improved NIL could be useful to enhance resistance against biotic stressors and produce stable grain yields in Oryza sativa subspecies indica rice breeding programs.Entities:
Keywords: MAS; Pi2; WDR; Xa23; bacterial blight; blast; rice; xa5
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235507 PMCID: PMC9573181 DOI: 10.3390/plants11192641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Schematic diagram for the development of NILs with homozygous Pi2, xa5, and Xa23 loci in the genetic background of Hanhui3. MAS, marker-assisted selection. CMS, cytoplasmic male sterility.
Linked markers for foreground selection of Pi2, xa5, and Xa23 genes.
| R Genes | Chr. | Marker Name | Primer Sequences (5′-3′) | Exp. Size (bp) | Band Type | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward Primer (F) | Reverse Primer (R) | ||||||
|
| 6 | AP22 | GTGCATGAGTCCAGCTCAAA | GTGTACTCCCATGGCTGCTC | 143 | Co-dominant | [ |
|
| 5 | RM611 | CAACAAGATGGCCTCTTACC | TACAAACAAACAGCTTGTGC | 213 | Co-dominant | [ |
|
| 11 | RM206 | CCCATGCGTTTAACTATTCT | CGTTCCATCGATCCGTATGG | 147 | Co-dominant | [ |
Figure 2Genetic background assay and phenotype of the improved NIL. (a) The black lines indicate the positions of three target genes, xa5 on chromosome 5, Pi2 on chromosome 6, and Xa23 on chromosome 11. The red lines indicate the SNP loci with homozygous genotypes where genomic fragments of the donor parents were introgressed. The green lines indicate the SNP loci with the same genotypes as the recurrent parent Hanhui3. (b) The phenotype of the improved NIL and recurrent parent. Left is NIL. Right is recurrent parent Hanhui3.
Blast and bacterial blight resistance of the improved NIL and its derived hybrids.
| Rice Line | Resistance Genes Genotype # | Reaction against Blast * | Reaction against BB * | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Score | Disease Reaction | Lesion Length | Disease Reaction | |
| Hanhui3 | -- | -- | -- | 7.5 | S | 15.22 ± 3.24 | S |
| R3-1 | ++ | ++ | ++ | 3.5 | MR | 1.51 ± 0.05 | R |
| 7A/Hanhui3 | -- | -- | -- | 5 | MS | 8.82 ± 2.18 | MS |
| 7A/R3-1 | +- | +- | +- | 3 | MR | 2.28 ± 0.37 | R |
| 5A/Hanhui3 | -- | -- | -- | 5.5 | MS | 9.03 ± 2.31 | MS |
| 5A/R3-1 | +- | +- | +- | 2.5 | MR | 2.09 ± 1.21 | R |
# ++, homozygous genotypes with the donor parents; --, homozygous genotypes with the recurrent parents; +-, heterozygous genotypes. * R, resistant; MR, moderately resistant; MS, moderately susceptible; S, susceptible; HS, highly susceptible.
The yields and agronomic performances of NIL and its derived hybrids under normal field conditions.
| Rice Line | Days to 50% Flowering | Plant Height (cm) | Panicle Length (cm) | No. of Tillers | No. of Grains per Panicle | Spikelet Fertility | 1000-Seed Weight | Yield per Plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanhui3 | 102.2 ± 3.5 | 117.45 ± 4.82 | 21.32 ± 1.83 | 6.65 ± 0.64 | 186.54 ± 8.71 | 87.34 ± 6.15 | 26.85 ± 0.44 | 29.11 ± 5.62 |
| R3-1 | 102.7 ± 1.2 | 115.13 ± 3.61 | 22.04 ± 0.87 | 6.75 ± 2.21 | 201.09 ± 7.81 * | 85.27 ± 1.78 | 26.29 ± 0.31 | 28.38 ± 3.61 |
| 7A/Hanhui3 | 88.0 ± 2.1 | 123.50 ± 6.14 | 24.15 ± 0.54 | 7.54 ± 1.04 | 177.32 ± 21.36 | 84.52 ± 2.84 | 29.33 ± 0.88 | 34.21 ± 3.89 |
| 7A/R3-1 | 88.3 ± 1.8 | 122.77 ± 5.57 | 25.72 ± 0.21 * | 7.44 ± 0.69 | 165.51 ± 10.37 | 88.19 ± 1.85 * | 30.68 ± 1.75 | 37.19 ± 2.41 |
| 5A/Hanhui3 | 93.2 ± 4.3 | 116.50 ± 2.64 | 23.52 ± 0.85 | 9.42 ± 0.53 | 182.13 ± 7.62 | 79.42 ± 1.64 | 26.41 ± 1.58 | 40.92 ± 6.48 |
| 5A/R3-1 | 91.4 ± 3.1 | 116.35 ± 5.71 | 24.74 ± 0.36 | 9.82 ± 0.82 | 185.12 ± 11.46 | 85.12 ± 3.68 | 25.98 ± 1.23 | 42.63 ± 5.63 |
The * indicates a significant difference compared with the performance of controls at * p < 0.05.
The yields and agronomic performances of Hanhui3 and NIL under drought conditions.
| Rice Line | Days to 50% Flowering | Plant Height (cm) | Panicle Length (cm) | No. of Tillers | No. of Grains per Panicle | Spikelet Fertility | 1000-Seed Weight | Yield per Plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanhui3 | 105.3 ± 3.21 | 87.06 ± 2.46 | 17.92 ± 1.54 | 5.33 ± 2.57 | 89.22 ± 8.52 | 69.30 ± 4.48 | 23.28 ± 1.76 | 15.06 ± 1.22 |
| R3-1 | 105.9 ± 2.42 | 86.50 ± 4.23 | 19.76 ± 2.58 | 5.00 ± 1.52 | 100.58 ± 11.72 | 78.97 ± 5.72 | 24.52 ± 1.51 | 14.95 ± 0.98 |